Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.434
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Sci Monit ; 30: e943196, 2024 Feb 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38347712

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a chronic inflammatory disease predominantly causing back pain, affects up to 0.5% of the global population, more commonly in males. Frequently undiagnosed in early stages, AS is often associated with comorbid depression and anxiety, imposing significant healthcare burdens. Despite available pharmaceutical treatments, exercise therapy (ET) has emerged as an effective, side-effect-free alternative, particularly for managing AS-induced back pain. This study aims to explore the research trends in ET for treating AS back pain from 2004-2023. MATERIAL AND METHODS A comprehensive analysis of 437 articles, sourced from the Science Citation Index-Expanded within the Web of Science Core Collection, was conducted using CiteSpace 6.2.R5. This study spanned from 2004 to October 15, 2023, examining publications, authors, institutions, and keywords to assess keyword co-occurrences, temporal progressions, and citation bursts. RESULTS Research interest in ET for AS began escalating around 2008 and has since shown steady growth. The USA emerged as a significant contributor, with Van der Heijde, Desiree, and RUDWALEIT M being notable authors. Key institutions include Assistance Publique Hopitaux Paris and UDICE-French Research Universities, with ANN RHEUM DIS being the most influential journal. The field's evolution is marked by interdisciplinary integration and branching into various sub-disciplines. CONCLUSIONS Exercise therapy for AS-induced back pain is a growing research area, necessitating further exploration in clinical management and rehabilitation strategies. The relationship between ET and osteoimmunological mechanisms remains a focal point for future research, with a trend towards personalized and interdisciplinary treatment approaches.


Asunto(s)
Espondilitis Anquilosante , Masculino , Humanos , Espondilitis Anquilosante/terapia , Terapia por Ejercicio , Ejercicio Físico , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Bibliometría
2.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 28(8): 825-833, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850492

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present investigation evaluates clinical uses and roles of platelet rich plasma in the management of vetrebrogenic and discogenic mediated pain states. RECENT FINDINGS: Back pain is a common and significant condition that affects millions of people around the world. The cause of back pain is often complex and multifactorial, with discogenic and vertebrogenic pain being two subtypes of back pain. Currently, there are numerous methods and modalities in which back pain is managed and treated such as physical therapy, electrical nerve stimulation, pharmacotherapies, and platelet-rich plasma. To conduct this systematic review, the authors used the keywords "platelet-rich plasma", "vertebrogenic pain", and "discogenic pain", on PubMed, EuroPMC, Who ICTRP, and clinicaltrials.gov to better elucidate the role of this treatment method for combating vertebrogenic and discogenic back pain. In recent decades, there has been a rise in popularity of the use of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of numerous musculoskeletal conditions. Related to high concentration of platelets, growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines, platelet-rich plasma is effective in reducing pain related symptoms and in the treatment of back pain. Platelet-rich plasma use has evolved and gained popularity for pain related conditions, including vertebrogenic and discogenic back pain. Additional well-designed studies are warranted in the future to better determine best practice strategies to provide future clinicians with a solid foundation of evidence to make advancements with regenerative medical therapies such as platelet-rich plasma.


Asunto(s)
Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Humanos , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor de Espalda/sangre
3.
Eur Spine J ; 33(8): 2960-2968, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39007982

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), pain during activity on a numeric rating scale (NRSa) and health related quality of life (EQ-5D) based on data from the Norwegian neck and back registry (NNRR). METHODS: A total of 1617 patients who responded to NNRR follow-up after both 6 and 12 months were included in this study. Responsiveness was calculated using standardized response mean and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We calculated MIC with both an anchor-based and distribution-based method. RESULTS: The condition specific ODI had best responsiveness, the more generic NRSa and EQ-5D had lower responsiveness. We found that the MIC for ODI varied from 3.0 to 9.5, from 0.4 to 2.5 for NRSa while the EQ5D varied from 0.05 to 0.12 depending on the method for calculation. CONCLUSION: In a register based back pain population, the condition specific ODI was more responsive to change than the more generic tools NRSa and EQ5D. The variations in responsiveness and MIC estimates also indicate that they should be regarded as indicative, rather than fixed estimates.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Noruega , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos
4.
Eur Spine J ; 33(7): 2553-2560, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842609

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The services defined as complementary and alternative medicine/healthcare (CAM) are used to varying degrees according to the nature of the health problem, and musculoskeletal disorders, in particular, often lead to the use of CAM. Chronic pain is often cited as a reason for using CAM, and it is also the cardinal symptom of patients with back pain referred for specialist care. However, previous studies do not consider the heterogeneity of back pain when examining the use of CAM. Thus, this study aimed to explore the associations between CAM use and clinical findings incl. ICD-10 diagnostic codes in such a context. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, a logistic regression analysis examined associations between CAM use and clinical findings at a public outpatient spine department. Chi-squared test examined the association between self-reported reasons for CAM use and the diagnostic groups. RESULTS: Of the 432 patients in the study population, 23.8% reported using CAM within 12 months prior to clinical assessment. CAM use was associated with being female and of younger age. Seeking CAM was not associated with clinical findings nor diagnosis, and no statistically significant association between the reasons for seeking CAM and the diagnostic groups was described. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients referred to specialist care for back pain, this study provides no evidence that the spinal condition should be expected to lead to the use of CAM. Only the individual demographic findings, specifically age and gender, were associated with CAM use.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor de Espalda/diagnóstico , Dolor de Espalda/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 414, 2024 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802802

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for assessing treatment effectiveness; however, they have been criticized for generalizability issues such as how well trial participants represent those who receive the treatments in clinical practice. We assessed the representativeness of participants from eight RCTs for chronic spine pain in the U.S., which were used for an individual participant data meta-analysis on the cost-effectiveness of spinal manipulation for spine pain. In these clinical trials, spinal manipulation was performed by chiropractors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective secondary analysis of RCT data to compare trial participants' socio-demographic characteristics, clinical features, and health outcomes to a representative sample of (a) U.S. adults with chronic spine pain and (b) U.S. adults with chronic spine pain receiving chiropractic care, using secondary data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). We assessed differences between trial and U.S. spine populations using independent t-tests for means and z-tests for proportions, accounting for the complex multi-stage survey design of the NHIS and MEPS. RESULTS: We found the clinical trials had an under-representation of individuals from health disparity populations with lower percentages of racial and ethnic minority groups (Black/African American 7% lower, Hispanic 8% lower), less educated (No high school degree 19% lower, high school degree 11% lower), and unemployed adults (25% lower) with worse health outcomes (physical health scores 2.5 lower and mental health scores 5.3 lower using the SF-12/36) relative to the U.S. population with spine pain. While the odds of chiropractic use in the U.S. are lower for individuals from health disparity populations, the trials also under-represented these populations relative to U.S. adults with chronic spine pain who visit a chiropractor. CONCLUSIONS: Health disparity populations are not well represented in spine pain clinical trials. Embracing key community-based approaches, which have shown promise for increasing participation of underserved communities, is needed.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda , Dolor Crónico , Dolor de Cuello , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Dolor de Cuello/terapia , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor de Espalda/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Manipulación Quiropráctica/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Manipulación Espinal/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Public Health ; 232: 161-169, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788492

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Patients in Germany have free choice of physicians in the ambulatory care sector and can consult them as often as they wish without a referral. This can lead to inefficiencies in treatment pathways. In response, some physicians have formed networks to improve the coordination and quality of care. This study aims to investigate whether the care provided by these networks results in better health and process outcomes than usual care. STUDY DESIGN: This was a quasi-experimental cohort study. METHODS: We analysed claims data from 2017 to 2018 in Bavaria, Brandenburg, and Westphalia-Lippe. Our study population includes patients aged 65 years or older with heart failure (n = 267,256), back pain (n = 931,672), or depression (n = 483,068). We compared condition-specific and generic quality indicators between patients treated in physician networks and usual care. Ambulatory care-sensitive emergency department cases were used as a primary outcome measure. Imbalances between the groups were minimized using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Rates of ambulatory care-sensitive emergency department cases yielded insignificant differences between networks and usual care in the depression and heart failure subgroups. For back pain patients, rates were 0.17 percentage points higher (P < 0.01) in network patients compared with usual care. Among network patients, generic indicators for prevention and coordination showed significantly better performance. For instance, the rate of completed vaccination against influenza is 3.03 percentage points higher (P < 0.01), and the rate of specialist visits after referral is 1.6 percentage points higher (P < 0.01) in heart failure patients, who are treated in physician networks. This is accompanied by higher rates of polypharmacy. Furthermore, the results for condition-specific indicators suggest that for most indicators, a greater proportion of the care provided by physician networks adhered to national treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that physician networks in Germany do not reduce rates of ambulatory care-sensitive emergency department cases but perform better than usual care in terms of care coordination and prevention. Further research is needed to confirm our findings and explore the implications of the potentially higher rates of polypharmacy seen in physician networks.


Asunto(s)
Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Anciano , Alemania , Femenino , Masculino , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Depresión/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud
7.
J Strength Cond Res ; 38(1): 206-219, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38085630

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Babiloni-Lopez, C, Fritz, N, Ramirez-Campillo, R, and Colado, JC. Water-based exercise in patients with nonspecific chronic low-back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 38(1): 206-219, 2024-This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize evidence (i.e., active [land-based training] and nonactive controls [e.g., receiving usual care]) regarding the effects of water-based training on patients with nonspecific chronic low-back pain (NSCLBP). Web of Science (WOS), PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, EBSCO (SPORTDiscus; CINAHL), and PEDro were searched, with no date restrictions, until October 2021. The included studies satisfied the following criteria: (a) NSCLBP (≥12 weeks) patients, (b) water-based intervention, (c) control group (land-based trained; nonactive group), and (d) outcomes related to pain, disability, quality of life, or flexibility. The main outcome analyzed in the meta-analysis was pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included disability, body mass index, and flexibility. The random-effects model was used, and effect size (ES) values are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The impact of heterogeneity was assessed (I2 statistic), with values of <25%, 25-75%, and >75% representing low, moderate, and high levels, respectively. Alpha was set at p < 0.05. In conclusion, 15 studies (n = 524) were meta-analyzed. After intervention, pain intensity was reduced compared with nonactive controls (ES = -3.61; p < 0.001) and a similar reduction was noted when compared with land-based trained group (ES = -0.14; p = 0.359). Greater decrease in disability (ES = 2.15; p < 0.001) and greater increase in sit-and-reach (i.e., flexibility; ES = -2.44; p < 0.001) were noted after intervention compared with the nonactive group. In conclusion, water-based exercise therapy reduces pain intensity, disability, and increases flexibility in NSCLBP compared with nonactive subjects and was equally effective compared with land-based exercise to reduce pain. Favorable effects may be expected at ≤8 weeks. However, due to several methodological issues (e.g., high heterogeneity), for the improvement of most outcomes, we are unable to provide other than a weak recommendation in favor of intervention compared with control treatment.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Agua , Ejercicio Físico , Terapia por Ejercicio , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor Crónico/terapia
8.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(7): 1291-1295, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028057

RESUMEN

Objective: To determine the effects of the cervicothoracic mobility programme on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic back pain. METHODS: The randomised controlled trial was conducted from April to November 2022 at the Physiotherapy Department of Syed Medical Complex, Sialkot, Pakistan, and comprised patients of either gender aged 18-50 years who had a minimum of 6 months of chronic back pain with moderate disability. They were randomly allocated to experimental group A and control group B. Group A subjects received cervical and thoracic mobilisation with conventional physical therapy, while group B subjects received conventional physical therapy alone. The treatment duration was 45 minutes per session, with 3 sessions per week for 3 weeks. Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and a goniometer was used to assess pain, disability and for the range of motion. Data was analysed using SPSS 25. RESULTS: Of the 44 patients, 22(50%) were in each of the 2 groups. Group A had 14(63.6%) females and 8(36.4%) males with overall mean age 36.45±10.80 years, while group B had 16(72.7%) females and 6(27.3%) males with overall mean age 35.77±11.05 years. There was a significant inter-group difference in terms of pain, function and flexion (p<0.05), while the difference was not significant in terms of extension, right and left lateral rotation (p>0.05). Intragroup analysis showed significant improvement in both groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Cervicothoracic mobilisation was more effective in improving pain, functionality and range of motion in patients with chronic low back pain. ClinicalTrial gov Identifier: NCT05347251.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Vértebras Torácicas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Dimensión del Dolor , Vértebras Cervicales , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Adolescente , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos
9.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(6)2024 Jun 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38929593

RESUMEN

As the prevalence of chronic non-specific spinal pain rises, the utilization of diverse massage devices for therapeutic intervention increases rapidly. However, research on their mechanisms, particularly those involving spinal twisting, is limited. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of heat application and spinal twisting massage techniques on individuals suffering from chronic non-specific spinal pain. A total of 36 individuals were divided into two groups: a control group (18 participants) and an experimental group (18 participants). The experimental group received heat treatment plus spinal twisting massage twice a week for four weeks, while the control group received heat therapy plus traditional vibration massage techniques. Effectiveness was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), the Korean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (K-WOMAC) Index, spine tilt, and Cobb angle. VAS, K-WOMAC, and PPT significantly improved in both groups at all three time points. VAS notably decreased in the experimental group compared to the control group (p-value: 0.0369). Despite improvements in K-WOMAC and PPT scores within the experimental group, statistical significance remained elusive. Furthermore, spine tilt and Cobb angle showed no significant differences from baseline to the 6th week. In conclusion, the application of thermotherapy coupled with twisting massage demonstrates significant efficacy in mitigating chronic non-specific spinal pain, surpassing the pain-relief outcomes achieved through heat therapy in combination with standard vibration massage techniques.


Asunto(s)
Masaje , Dimensión del Dolor , Humanos , Masaje/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Vibración/uso terapéutico
10.
Pain Pract ; 24(3): 502-513, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38057944

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The combined use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and muscle stimulation, in the treatment of chronic pain, using the same probe, could improve the clinical results. However, this technique has not been established as yet. It was our hypothesis that it is possible to generate muscle stimulation by using low frequencies with SCS electrodes and use it to additionally treat chronic back pain. METHODS: We generated muscle stimulation in patients with previously implanted SCS electrodes, for the treatment of lower back pain, by using low frequencies (2, 4, 6, and 8 Hz) and different contact combinations of the electrodes. The results were evaluated by using visual inspection (videos), haptic control, surface electromyography (EMG), and sonographic recordings. RESULTS: This pilot study (17 patients, seven females, age 36-87 years, 11 percutaneous paddle leads, and 6 octrodes) was performed at the Neurosurgical Department of the University of Tuebingen. The most preferred frequencies were 6 Hz (45.5% of percutaneous paddle leads) and 8 Hz (50% of octrodes) at contacts 3&4 or 5&6. The preference of frequencies differed significantly among genders (p = 0.023). Simultaneous EMG and ultrasonic recordings demonstrated the generation of muscle potentials and the stimulation of deeper muscle groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, it has been shown that with low-frequency SCS stimulation, pleasant and pain-relieving muscle contractions of the lower and upper back can also be generated. This combined method has been coined by us as "MuscleSCS" technique. Clinical trials are necessary to establish the value of this combined technique and its subtypes.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Electrodos Implantados , Médula Espinal , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Med Care ; 61(Suppl 1): S30-S38, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36893416

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: In recent years, 2 circumstances have changed provider-patient interactions in ambulatory care: (1) the replacement of virtual for in-person visits and (2) the COVID-19 pandemic. We studied the potential impact of each event on provider practice and patient adherence by comparing the frequency of the association of provider orders, and patient fulfillment of those orders, by visit mode and pandemic period, for incident neck or back pain (NBP) visits in ambulatory care. METHODS: Data were extracted from the electronic health records of 3 Kaiser Permanente regions (Colorado, Georgia, and Mid-Atlantic States) from January 2017 to June 2021. Incident NBP visits were defined from ICD-10 coded as primary or first listed diagnoses on adult, family medicine, or urgent care visits separated by at least 180 days. Visit modes were classified as virtual or in-person. Periods were classified as prepandemic (before April 2020 or the beginning of the national emergency) or recovery (after June 2020). Percentages of provider orders for, and patient fulfillment of orders, were measured for 5 service classes and compared on: virtual versus in-person visits, and prepandemic versus recovery periods. Comparisons were balanced on patient case-mix using inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Ancillary services in all 5 categories at each of the 3 Kaiser Permanente regions were substantially ordered less frequently on virtual compared with in-person visits in both the prepandemic and recovery periods (both P ≤ 0.001). Conditional on an order, patient fulfillment within 30 days was high (typically ≥70%) and not likely meaningfully different between visit modes or pandemic periods. CONCLUSIONS: Ancillary services for incident NBP visits were ordered less frequently during virtual than in-person visits in both prepandemic and recovery periods. Patient fulfillment of orders was high, and not significantly different by mode or period.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Atención Ambulatoria , Cooperación del Paciente
12.
Semin Neurol ; 43(3): 419-431, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37549691

RESUMEN

Chronic neck and back pain are two of the most common and disabling complaints seen in primary care and neurology practices. Most commonly these come in the form of cervical and lumbar radiculopathy, lumbar spinal stenosis, and cervical and lumbar facet arthropathy. Treatment options are widespread and include nonpharmacological, pharmacological, surgical, and interventional options. The focus of this review will be to discuss the most common interventional procedures performed for chronic cervical and lumbar back pain, common indications for performing these interventions, as well as associated benefits and risks. These interventions alone may not suffice to improve the quality of life in those suffering from chronic pain. However, an understanding of the interventional pain options available and the evidence behind performing these interventions can help providers incorporate these into a multimodal approach to provide effective pain management that may allow patients an improved quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor Crónico/terapia
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 793, 2023 Jul 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37491238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adults with back pain commonly consult chiropractors, but the impact of chiropractic use on medical utilization and costs within the Canadian health system is unclear. We assessed the association between chiropractic utilization and subsequent medical healthcare utilization and costs in a population-based cohort of Ontario adults with back pain. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study that included Ontario adult respondents of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) with back pain from 2003 to 2010 (n = 29,475), followed up to 2018. The CCHS data were individually-linked to individual-level health administrative data up to 2018. Chiropractic utilization was self-reported consultation with a chiropractor in the past 12 months. We propensity score-matched adults with and without chiropractic utilization, accounting for confounders. We evaluated back pain-specific and all-cause medical utilization and costs at 1- and 5-year follow-up using negative binomial and linear (log-transformed) regression, respectively. We assessed whether sex and prior specialist consultation in the past 12 months were effect modifiers of the association. RESULTS: There were 6972 matched pairs of CCHS respondents with and without chiropractic utilization. Women with chiropractic utilization had 0.8 times lower rate of cause-specific medical visits at follow-up than those without chiropractic utilization (RR5years = 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-1.00); this association was not found in men (RR5years = 0.96, 95% CI 0.73-1.24). There were no associations between chiropractic utilization and all-cause physician visits, all-cause emergency department visits, all-cause hospitalizations, or costs. Effect modification of the association between chiropractic utilization and cause-specific utilization by prior specialist consultation was found at 1-year but not 5-year follow-up; cause-specific utilization at 1 year was lower in adults without prior specialist consultation only (RR1year = 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with back pain, chiropractic use is associated with lower rates of back pain-specific utilization in women but not men over a 5-year follow-up period. Findings have implications for guiding allied healthcare delivery in the Ontario health system.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Ontario/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Dolor de Espalda/epidemiología , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud
14.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 29(4): 102-109, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34653025

RESUMEN

Context: Acceptance of chiropractic services as an effective therapy for neck or back pain has been well established with randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, there have been limited observations made on the treatment frequency patterns seen in the real world. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify chiropractic users with neck or back pain who did not meet recommended treatment frequency guidelines and examine their demographics and chiropractic costs. Design: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, the nationally representative 2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey database was used. Setting: This study used nationally representative US survey data. Participants: Inclusion criteria were adults aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of neck or back pain with one or more chiropractic visits in 2017. Outcomes Measures: Chiropractic utilization was categorized as concordant or discordant with treatment frequency guidelines; concordant was defined as 5 or more visits to a chiropractor within any 2-month time frame or at least 12 total visits during the year. Discordant was defined as circumstances not meeting concordant criteria. The groups were compared by demographics including age, sex, race, region, years of education, health insurance coverage, employment status, family income, presence of headache diagnosis, Charlson Comorbidity Index score and the presence of any limitation of physical function. Comparisons were made between the two groups using Chi-squared tests. Logistic regression was used to adjust for covariates. Results: There were 159 and 310 adults classified as concordant and discordant, respectively (weighted total: 1 849 108 [31.44%] and 4 032 541 [68.56%], with significantly different mean chiropractic costs of $2555 and $434, respectively. Significant independent predictors of discordant chiropractic utilization were race, years of education, family income and the presence of any limitation of physical function. Conclusions: Most chiropractic users with diagnosed neck or back pain were considered discordant with treatment frequency guidelines, which may indicate inefficiencies in treatment and inefficient use of healthcare resources.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica , Manipulación Quiropráctica , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Dolor de Cuello/epidemiología , Dolor de Cuello/terapia , Dolor de Espalda/epidemiología , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Demografía
15.
Neuromodulation ; 26(5): 1023-1029, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36494306

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Although both high-frequency and burst spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have shown improved efficacy and patient satisfaction compared with conventional tonic stimulation, there are limited data directly comparing the two. This study aimed to compare both high-frequency 10,000 Hz and burst SCS in the same patients in terms of pain relief and satisfaction in those with axial back pain with or without leg pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at an outpatient pain clinic within an academic medical center. Participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups in which they trialed either burst or high-frequency 10,000 Hz SCS over five days, followed by a 24- to 48-hour washout period with no stimulation, and the alternative therapy over the remaining four days. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were collected immediately before and after both therapy trials. Secondary end points included percentage change in VAS score and patient preference. RESULTS: Of 25 participants, those receiving burst followed by high-frequency SCS (n = 11) had a mean VAS difference of 4.73 after the first trial period and 2.86 after the second. Of those receiving high-frequency followed by burst SCS (n = 14), mean VAS difference after the first trial period was 4.00 and 1.93 after the second trial period. Four participants were withdrawn owing to lead migration. Both therapies showed statistically significant differences in pre- minus post-VAS scores and percent relief. There were no significant differences in carryover or treatment effects between the two groups. There was a statistically significant association between trial sequence and stimulator type implanted because the first stimulator trialed was more likely to be chosen. CONCLUSIONS: There were no observed differences in VAS pain score decrease when comparing burst and high-frequency 10,000 Hz SCS programming therapies. Patient preference followed an order effect, favoring the first programming therapy in the trial sequence.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Estudios Cruzados , Método Simple Ciego , Estudios Prospectivos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Médula Espinal , Dolor Crónico/terapia
16.
Neuromodulation ; 26(3): 658-665, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35088732

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) or failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) refers to new or persistent pain following spinal surgery for back or leg pain in a subset of patients. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a neuromodulation technique that can be considered in patients with predominant leg pain refractory to conservative treatment. Patients with predominant low back pain benefit less from SCS. Another neuromodulation technique for treatment of chronic low back pain is subcutaneous stimulation or peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS). We investigated the effect of SCS with additional PNFS on pain and quality of life of patients with PSPS compared with that of SCS alone after 12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a comparative study of patients with PSPS who responded to treatment with either SCS + PNFS or SCS only following a multicenter randomized clinical trial protocol. In total, 75 patients completed the 12-month follow-up: 21 in the SCS-only group and 54 in the SCS + PNFS group. Outcome measures were pain (visual analog scale), quality of life (36-Item Short Form Survey [SF-36]), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), overall health (EuroQol Five-Dimension [EQ-5D]), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), and pain assessed by the McGill questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Both groups showed a significant reduction in back and leg pain at 12 months compared with baseline measurements. No significant differences were found between the groups in effect on both primary (pain) and secondary parameters (SF-36, HADS, EQ-5D, ODI, and McGill pain). CONCLUSION: In a subgroup of patients with chronic back and leg pain, SCS alone provided similar long-term pain relief and quality-of-life improvement as PNFS in addition to SCS. In patients with refractory low back pain not responding to SCS alone, adding PNFS should be recommended. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT01776749.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor de Espalda/complicaciones , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Nervios Periféricos , Calidad de Vida , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/métodos
17.
Neuromodulation ; 26(1): 182-191, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36503999

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to discuss the possible mechanisms of action (MOAs) and results of a pilot study of a novel, anatomically placed, and paresthesia-independent, neurostimulation waveform for the management of chronic intractable pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A novel, multilayered pulsed stimulation pattern (PSP) that comprises three temporal layers, a Pulse Pattern layer, Train layer, and Dosage layer, was developed for the treatment of chronic intractable pain. During preliminary development, the utility was evaluated of anatomical PSP (aPSP) in human subjects with chronic intractable pain of the leg(s) and/or low back, compared with that of traditional spinal cord stimulation (T-SCS) and physiological PSP. The scientific theory and testing presented in this article provide the preliminary justification for the potential MOAs by which PSP may operate. RESULTS: During the pilot study, aPSP (n = 31) yielded a greater decrease in both back and leg pain than did T-SCS (back: -60% vs -46%; legs: -63% vs -43%). In addition, aPSP yielded higher responder rates for both back and leg pain than did T-SCS (61% vs 48% and 78% vs 50%, respectively). DISCUSSION: The novel, multilayered approach of PSP may provide multimechanistic therapeutic relief through preferential fiber activation in the dorsal column, optimization of the neural onset response, and use of both the medial and lateral pathway through the thalamic nuclei. The results of the pilot study presented here suggest a robust responder rate, with several subjects (five subjects with back pain and three subjects with leg pain) achieving complete relief from PSP during the acute follow-up period. These clinical findings suggest PSP may provide a multimechanistic, anatomical, and clinically effective management for intractable chronic pain. Because of the limited sample size of clinical data, further testing and long-term clinical assessments are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor Intratable , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Pierna , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Médula Espinal
18.
Neuromodulation ; 26(3): 694-699, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36870933

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Patients with spinal lesions or vertebral compression fractures from multiple myeloma often present with back pain that restricts their ability to lie flat and prevents them from undergoing cancer treatment. Temporary, percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been described for cancer pain secondary to oncologic surgery or neuropathy/radiculopathy from tumor invasion. The purpose of this case series is to show the use of PNS as an analgesic bridge therapy to treat myeloma-related back pain and allow patients to complete their course of radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Temporary, percutaneous PNS was placed under fluoroscopic guidance for four patients with unremitting low back pain secondary to myelomatous spinal lesions. Before PNS, the patients had pain refractory to medical management and were unable to tolerate radiation mapping and treatment owing to low back pain while supine. Patients were followed with routine clinic visits to monitor pain and progression through cancer therapy. PNS was removed after approximately 60 days or after completion of radiation. RESULTS: This case series presents four successful cases of PNS to treat low back pain from myelomatous spinal lesions and associated vertebral compression fractures. PNS targeted the medial branch nerves to treat both nociceptive and neuropathic low back pain. All four patients successfully completed radiation therapy with PNS in place. CONCLUSIONS: PNS can effectively treat low back pain secondary to myeloma-related spinal lesions as a bridge therapy to radiation. The use of PNS is a promising option for back pain from other primary or metastatic tumors. Further research is needed into the use of PNS for cancer-related back pain.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Mieloma Múltiple , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Terapia Puente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Nervios Periféricos
19.
Schmerz ; 37(2): 123-133, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35192050

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is no evidence of effectiveness for interdisciplinary second opinion procedures (ISOP) for recommended back surgery (BS). Since 2015, AOK Nordost has been offering the care program RückenSPEZIAL comprising a preliminary examination, ISOP, and optional interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT). The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of RückenSPEZIAL to reduce BS and back pain-related costs (BPRC) compared to patients who likewise received a recommendation for back surgery but not RückenSPEZIAL. METHODS: Insured persons in the AOK Nordost consulted the AOK service center, presented a BS hospital admission slip and received advice to participate in RückenSPEZIAL. Following a 1:1 "matched pairs" selection, patients who participated in RückenSPEZIAL (intervention group [IG]) after this consultation (reference date) where compared with patients who did not participate after this consultation (comparison group [CG]). Patient characteristics, BS and BPRC were operationalised from AOK Nordost claims data. RESULTS: Of 108 IG patients and 108 CG patients, 34 (42%) fewer IG patients had one or more BS in 365 following days (relative risk [RR] 0.58; p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis showed for 21 IG patients with ISOP and IMPT an RR of 0.13 (p < 0.001), and for 67 IG patients with solely ISOP without IMPT an RR of 0.59 (p < 0.001). The increase in RBC from the previous year to the following year was 50.2 percentage points lower for IG patients compared to CG patients (p = 0.088). DISCUSSION: The differences in BS were significant (p < 0.05) and in favor of RückenSPEZIAL. For the specific population it can be expected that mainly savings on BS can cover the intervention costs of RückenSPEZIAL (approximately significant, small case number). Bias due to self-selection needs to be assumed.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda , Hospitalización , Humanos , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Derivación y Consulta
20.
Schmerz ; 37(5): 324-329, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36920553

RESUMEN

Pain that persists or recurs over a period of at least 3 months in childhood and adolescence is referred to as chronic pain. The primary localization of pain changes according to age: abdominal pain is more common at a younger age, headache is more common in adolescents and later back pain as well as muscle and joint pain. In the multimodal and interdisciplinary treatment of chronic pain, complementary procedures can expand the treatment spectrum. This article provides an overview of the existing evidence that for childhood and adolescence can at best be evaluated as readily understandable. In addition, the experiences of two children's hospitals show that complementary medicine can be used as a low-threshold and easily implemented therapy.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Abdominal/terapia , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Cefalea/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA