Trends in the use of cerebrospinal drains and outcomes related to spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair and complex endovascular aortic repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative database.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a dreaded complication of thoracic and complex endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR/cEVAR). Controversy exists surrounding cerebrospinal fluid drain (CSFD) use, especially preoperative prophylactic placement, owing to concerns regarding catheter-related complications. However, these risks are balanced by the widely accepted benefits of CSFDs during open repair to prevent and/or rescue patients with SCI. The importance of this issue is underscored by the paucity of data on CSFD practice patterns, limiting the development of practice guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of the present analysis was to evaluate the differences between patients who developed SCI despite preoperative CSFD placement and those treated with therapeutic postoperative CSFD placement. METHODS: All elective TEVAR/cEVAR procedures for degenerative aneurysm pathology in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed. CSFD use over time, the factors associated with preoperative prophylactic vs postoperative therapeutic CSFD placement in patients with SCI (transient or permanent), and outcomes were evaluated. Survival differences were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 3406 TEVAR/cEVAR procedures met the inclusion criteria, with an overall SCI rate of 2.3% (n = 88). The SCI rate decreased from 4.55% in 2014 to 1.43% in 2018. Prophylactic preoperative CSFD use was similar over time (2014, 30%; vs 2018, 27%; P = .8). After further exclusions to evaluate CSFD use in those who had developed SCI, 72 patients were available for analysis, 48 with SCI and prophylactic CSFD placement and 24 with SCI and therapeutic CSFD placement. Specific to SCI, the patient demographics and comorbidities were not significantly different between the prophylactic and therapeutic groups, with the exception of previous aortic surgery, which was more common in the prophylactic CSFD cohort (46% vs 23%; P < .001). The SCI outcome was significantly worse for the therapeutic group because 79% had documented permanent paraplegia at discharge compared with 54% of the prophylactic group (P = .04). SCI patients receiving a postoperative therapeutic CSFD had had worse survival than those with a preoperative prophylactic CSFD (50% ± 10% vs 71% ± 9%; log-rank P = .1; Wilcoxon P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic CSFD use with TEVAR/cEVAR remained stable during the study period. Of the SCI patients, postoperative therapeutic CSFD placement was associated with worse sustained neurologic outcomes and overall survival compared with preoperative prophylactic CSFD placement. These findings highlight the need for a randomized clinical trial to examine prophylactic vs therapeutic CSFD placement in association with TEVAR/cEVAR.

A novel surgical technique for spontaneous intracerebral hematoma evacuation.

Stereotactic removal of intracerebral hematoma is a routine procedure for treating hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, but the complex sequence of operations limits its adoption. We explored the application of a novel surgical technique for the removal of spontaneous intracerebral hematomas. The surgical technique based on computed tomography (CT) images was used in hematoma projection and surgical planning. Markers placed on the scalp based on an Android smartphone app allowed the installation of a stereotactic head frame to facilitate the selection of the best trajectory to the hematoma center for removing the hematoma. Forty-two patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage were included in the study, including 33 cases of supratentorial hemorrhage, 5 cases of cerebellum hemorrhage, and 4 cases of brain stem hemorrhage. The surgical technique combined with the stereotactic head frame helped the tip of the drainage tube achieve the desired position. The median surgical time was 45 (range 25-75) min. The actual head frame operating time was 10 (range 5-15) min. Target alignment performed by the surgical technique was accurate to ≤ 10.0 mm in all 42 cases. No patient experienced postoperative rebleeding. In 33 cases of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage, an average evacuation rate of 77.5% was achieved at postoperative 3.1 ± 1.4 days, and 29 (87.9%) cases had a residual hematoma of < 15 ml. The novel surgical technique helped to quickly and effortlessly localize hematomas and achieve satisfactory hematoma removal. Clinical application of the stereotactic head frame was feasible for intracerebral hemorrhage in various locations.

Role of the patient comorbidity in the recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas.

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is an old blood collection between the cortical surface and the dura. Recurrence of CSDH after surgical evacuation occurs in up to a quarter of patients. The association between patient premorbid status and the rate of recurrence is not well known, and some previous results are contradictory. We aim to determine the impact of patient comorbidities in the risk of recurrence after surgical evacuation of CSDH. Retrospective data of a single institution's surgically evacuated CSDH cases followed up for at least 6 months were analyzed, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the relationships between recurrence of CSDH and factors such as age, gender, CSDH thickness, neurological impairment at admission (NIHSS score), location of the CSDH (unilateral vs bilateral), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), prothrombin time (PT), hemoglobin levels, and platelet count. A total of 90 patients (71 men and 19 women), aged 41-100 years (mean age, 76.4 ± 11.2 years), were included. CSDH recurred in 17 patients (18.9%). A higher CCI correlated with higher scores in the NIHSS. In the univariate analysis, recurrence was associated with a higher CCI (2.39 vs 1.22, p = 0.002), higher NIHSS scores (6.5 vs 4, p = 0.034), and lower PT levels (9.9 vs 13.4, p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, only PT and CCI demonstrated to be independent risk factors for CSDH recurrence after surgical evacuation (p = 0.033 and p = 0.024, respectively). Patients with more comorbidities have a higher risk of developing recurrent CSDH. CCI provides a simple way of predicting recurrence in patients with CSDH and should be incorporated into decision-making processes, when counseling patients.

Characteristics and management of hydrocephalus associated with vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review.

Hydrocephalus (HC) can be associated with vestibular schwannoma (VS) at presentation. Although spontaneous resolution of HC after VS removal is reported, first-line treatment is varied including preoperative ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt, external ventricular drainage (EVD), or lumbar drainage (LD). We performed a systematic review to clarify optimal management of HC associated with VS at presentation, as well as characteristics of patients with initial and persistent HC after VS removal, and prevalence of HC associated with VS. Fourteen studies were included. Patients were grouped according to the timing of HC treatment. The overall rate of VP shunts was 19.4%. Among patients who received VS removal as first-line treatment, 6.9% underwent permanent shunts. In a subgroup of 132 patients (studies with no-aggregate data), t test analysis for mean tumor size (P = 0.02) and mean CSF protein level (P < 0.001) demonstrated statistically significant differences between patients with resolved HC (3.48 cm and 201 mg/dL) and patients with persistent HC (2.46 cm and 76.8 mg/dL) after VS resection. Transient treatment of HC using EVD or LD further resolved the HC in 87.5% and 82.9% of patients, respectively, before and after VS removal. The overall prevalence of HC associated with VS in a population of 2336 patients was 9.3%. Schwannoma removal as first-line treatment is justified by its low rate of persistent HC requiring VP shunt (roughly 7%). Patients with smaller VS and lower CSF proteins present higher risk of persistent HC after schwannoma removal. Temporary treatment of HC contributes to its resolution, both before and after VS removal.

Continuous dural suturing for closure of grade 3 leaks after tumor removal via an endoscopic endonasal approach.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a major complication after extended endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETSS), which is commonly used in the treatment of anterior skull base tumors. Dural suturing and graded reconstruction are promising techniques to further decrease the incidence of postoperative CSF (poCSF) leakage. The effect of continuous dural suturing in endoscopic surgery was investigated in this retrospective study. A total of 79 EETSS patients were included; the procedures were performed for subdural tumor removal by a single endoscopic neurosurgical team. Comparisons were applied between patients who did and did not undergo endoscopic dural suturing after tumor removal. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables that significantly influenced the incidence of poCSF leakage. In all, 79 adult patients developed Esposito's grade 3 intraoperative high-flow CSF leakage. Ten patients (12.7%) experienced poCSF leakage. One of the 36 patients who underwent intraoperative dural suturing developed poCSF leakage, compared with nine of 43 patients who did not undergo dural suturing (p = 0.016). Regression analysis showed that dural suturing could significantly decrease the incidence of poCSF leakage (p = 0.049, OR 0.108, 95% CI 0.013-0.899). Prophylactic lumbar drainage could also help decrease the CSF leakage rate. Dural suturing under endoscopy is a promising and effective method for application in skull base reconstruction after subdural skull base tumor removal. With future progress, lumbar drainage and even nasoseptal flap placement could be replaced in certain groups of patients undergoing EETSS.

Comparative study of complications after primary and revision transsphenoidal endoscopic surgeries.

A preferred treatment for residual/recurrent pituitary adenomas has not been established. The existence of higher complication rates for revision surgeries remains under debate. This study aimed to compare complication rates of primary and revision transsphenoidal endoscopic surgeries and to identify risk factors for complications. Data from 144 primary and 39 revision surgeries were analysed. The surgical complications evaluated were intraoperative and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks; meningitis; permanent diabetes insipidus (DI) and hypopituitarism; worsening visual acuity; ophthalmoplegias; visual field defects; otorhinolaryngological, systemic and vascular complications; and death. The variables that were potentially associated with surgical complications were gender, age, comorbidities, lumbar drain use, duration of lumbar drain use, invasion of the sphenoid and cavernous sinuses, presence and degree of suprasellar expansion, preoperative identification of the pituitary, CSF leaks and intraoperative pituitary identification. Intraoperative CSF leaks, visual field losses and worsening visual acuity were more common for revision surgeries. There were no between-group differences in the occurrence of postoperative CSF leaks; systemic, vascular and otorhinolaryngological complications; meningitis; DI and hypopituitarism; ophthalmoplegias; or death. Intraoperative identification of the pituitary was associated with lower rates of permanent DI and hypopituitarism, systemic complications, intraoperative CSF leaks and worsening visual acuity. Suprasellar expansion increased the risk of intraoperative CSF leaks but not endocrinological deficits or visual impairment. Intraoperative CSF leaks were associated with postoperative CSF leaks, meningitis, anterior hypopituitarism, DI and worsening visual acuity. Intraoperative CSF leaks, worsening visual acuity and visual field losses were more common in reoperated patients.

Surgical management of hidradenitis suppurativa: procedural trends and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic debilitating cutaneous disorder. The recalcitrant nature of this disease may require surgery in severe cases. We aimed to delineate the types of operations performed, the risk factors associated with these operations, and the surgical services involved based on a national database. METHODS: Data were collected through the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2011 to 2016. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, (ICD-9) codes were used for data extraction and analysis as type of surgery and complication rates were extracted. RESULTS: There were 2594 patients diagnosed with HS: 1405 (54.2%) incision and drainage, 1017 (39.2%) debridement, 31 (1.2%) skin graft, and 141 (5.4%) flap reconstruction. There were significant differences in transfusion rates and operation time among the four procedures. Skin graft and flap reconstruction had the highest complications and longest operation time. Bleeding requiring preoperative transfusion and a number of comorbidities were significant risk factors for postoperative complications. Flap reconstructions by plastic surgeons compared to general surgeons had significantly shorter operation times (134.89 versus 209.82 min, P = 0.022) and lower transfusion rates (2.2% versus 12.8%, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The management of HS can be complex and may require a multidisciplinary approach. Bleeding requiring preoperative transfusion and other baseline comorbidities are independent risk factors that should be addressed when definitive surgical treatment of hidradenitis is planned. Appropriate surgical specialty involvement may better optimize the surgical outcomes for HS.

Suprapubic tube versus urethral catheter drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in the elderly population. The standard treatment is radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, urologists do not have consents on the postoperative urine drainage management (suprapubic tube (ST)/ urethral catheter (UC)). Thus, we try to compare ST drainage to UC drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy regarding to comfort, recovery rate and continence using the method of meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in Dec. 2017 on PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. The authors independently reviewed the records to identify studies comparing ST with UC of patients underwent RARP. Meta-analysis was performed using the extracted data from the selected studies. RESULTS: Seven studies, including 3 RCTs, with a total of 946 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in our meta-analysis. Though there was no significant difference between the ST group and the UC group on postoperative pain (RR1.73, P 0.20), our study showed a significant improvement on bother or discomfort, defined as trouble in hygiene and sleep, caused by catheter when compared two groups at postoperative day (POD) 7 in ST group (RR2.05, P 0.006). There was no significant difference between the ST group and UC group on urinary continence (RR0.98, P 0.74) and emergency department visit (RR0.61, P 0.11). The rates of bladder neck contracture and other complications were very low in both groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to UC, ST showed a weak advantage. So it might be a good choice to choose ST over RARP.

Chronic overdrainage syndrome: pathophysiological insights based on ICP analysis: a case-based review.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic overdrainage affects shunted patients producing a variety of symptoms that may be misdiagnosed. The best known symptoms are so-called shunt-related headaches. There is mounting evidence that changes in cerebrospinal venous system dynamics are a key factor to the pathophysiology of chronic overdrainage syndrome. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 29-year-old woman with a shunt since the postnatal period suffering from chronic but the most severe intermittent headache attacks, despite an open shunt and with unchanged ventricular width during attacks. Intracranial pressure (ICP) recordings were performed during headache attacks and thereafter. DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGMENT: Massively increased ICPs, a continuous B wave "storm," and severely compromised intracranial compliance despite an open shunt were found, a scenario that was always self-limiting with the resolution of symptoms after several hours. When mobilized to the upright position, her ICPs dropped to - 17 mm Hg, proving shunt overdrainage. OUTCOME AND CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatology can only be explained by sudden venous entrapment following chronic venous distention as a result of chronic overdrainage. Subsequent therapeutic management with an overdrainage preventing shunt and satisfying clinical outcome with complete ceasing of headache attacks adds insight into the pathophysiology of chronic overdrainage syndrome.

Current Management of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma and Future Perspectives.

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is the most common type of biliary tract cancer and is associated with a high mortality, usually due to late presentation. High-resolution cross-sectional imaging modalities are necessary for diagnosis and preoperative planning. Although surgical resection with negative margins offers the only hope for cure, only a small subset of patients are amenable for surgery at the time of diagnosis. Portal vein embolization and biliary tract decompression are important in some patients prior to surgical resection. Liver transplantation in combination with neoadjuvant therapy has resulted in excellent 5-year recurrence-free survival rates in highly selected patients with inoperable disease. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin constitute the backbone of chemotherapy in patients with inoperable metastatic perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Recent advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of CCA have created a growing interest in identifying novel therapies targeting key molecular pathways. Herein, we provide an overview of the most current principles of management of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Diagnostic strategy and timing of intervention in infected necrotizing pancreatitis: an international expert survey and case vignette study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal diagnostic strategy and timing of intervention in infected necrotizing pancreatitis is subject to debate. We performed a survey on these topics amongst a group of international expert pancreatologists. METHODS: An online survey including case vignettes was sent to 118 international pancreatologists. We evaluated the use and timing of fine needle aspiration (FNA), antibiotics, catheter drainage and (minimally invasive) necrosectomy. RESULTS: The response rate was 74% (N = 87). None of the respondents use FNA routinely, 85% selectively and 15% never. Most respondents (87%) use a step-up approach in patients with infected necrosis. Walled-off necrosis (WON) is considered a prerequisite for endoscopic drainage and percutaneous drainage by 66% and 12%, respectively. After diagnosing infected necrosis, 55% routinely postpone invasive interventions, whereas 45% proceed immediately to intervention. Lack of consensus about timing of intervention was apparent on day 14 with proven infected necrosis (58% intervention vs. 42% non-invasive) as well as on day 20 with only clinically suspected infected necrosis (59% intervention vs. 41% non-invasive). DISCUSSION: The step-up approach is the preferred treatment strategy in infected necrotizing pancreatitis amongst expert pancreatologists. There is no uniformity regarding the use of FNA and timing of intervention in the first 2-3 weeks of infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

Complications of spinal fluid drainage in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in 724 patients treated from 1987 to 2013.

OBJECTIVE: To study complications from spinal fluid drainage in open thoracic/thoracoabdominal and thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs to define risks of spinal fluid drainage. DESIGN: Retrospective, prospectively maintained, institutionally approved database. SETTING: Single institution university center. PARTICIPANTS: 724 patients treated from 1987 to 2013 INTERVENTIONS: The authors drained spinal fluid to a pressure≤6 mmHg during thoracic aortic occlusion/reperfusion in open and ≤8 mmHg after stent deployment in endovascular procedures. Low pressure was maintained until leg strength was documented. If bloody fluid appeared, drainage was stopped. Head computed tomography (CT) and, if indicated, spine CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed for bloody spinal fluid or neurologic deficit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Spinal fluid drainage was studied for bloody fluid, CT/MRI-identified intracranial and spinal bleeding, neurologic deficit, and death. Seventy-three patients (10.1%) had bloody fluid; 38 (5.2%) had intracranial blood on CT. One patient had spinal epidural hematoma. Higher volume of fluid drained and higher central venous pressure during proximal clamping were associated with intracranial blood. Most patients with intracranial blood were asymptomatic. Six patients had neurologic deficits: of the 6, 3 died (0.4%), 1 (0.1%) had permanent hemiparesis, and 2 recovered. Three of the six deficits were delayed, associated with heparin anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: 10% of patients had bloody spinal fluid; half of these had intracranial bleeding, which was almost always asymptomatic. In these patients, immediately stopping drainage and correcting coagulopathy may decrease the risk of serious complications. Neurologic deficit from spinal fluid drainage is uncommon (0.8%), but has high morbidity and mortality.

Interventional therapies for malignant pleural effusions: the present and the future.

The approach to management of malignant pleural effusions (MPE) has changed over the past few decades. The key goals of MPE management are to relieve patient symptoms using the least invasive means and in the most cost-effective manner. There is now a realization that patient-reported outcome measures should be the primary goal of MPE treatment, and this now is the focus in most clinical trials. Efforts to minimize patient morbidity are complemented by development of less invasive treatments that have mostly replaced the more aggressive surgical approaches of the past. Therapeutic thoracentesis is simple, effective and generally safe, although its benefits may only be temporary. Pleurodesis is the conventional and for a long time the only definitive therapy available. However, the efficacy and safety of talc pleurodesis has been challenged. Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) drainage is increasingly accepted worldwide and represents a new concept to improve symptoms without necessarily generating pleural symphysis. Recent studies support the effectiveness of IPC treatment and provide reassurance regarding its safety. An unprecedented number of clinical trials are now underway to improve various aspects of MPE care. However, choosing an optimal intervention for MPE in an individual patient remains a challenge due to our limited understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of breathlessness in MPE and a lack of predictors of survival and pleurodesis outcome. This review provides an overview of common pleural interventional procedures used for MPE management, controversies and limitations of current practice, and areas of research most needed to improve practice in future.

[Changes in indications for surgery in the management of diverticulitis]. / Primum et super omnium: nihil nocere Operationsindikation im Wandel bei Divertikulitis.

Diverticulitis is a common disease in western countries and its incidence is increasing especially among young patients. Colonic diverticulosis, incidentally diagnosed by endoscopy or CT-scanning, has no immediate clinical consequences. Progression to diverticulitis develops in only 4 % of cases. In the last decades management of diverticular disease evolved and expectative treatment and less invasive techniques have gained importance. Elective resection has traditionally been advised after a second episode of diverticulitis or after a first episode if the patient was less than 50 years of age or complicated disease occurred. Recent changes in understanding the natural history of diverticular disease have substantially modified treatment paradigms. Elective resection in case of recurrent diverticular disease should be performed on a individual basis and in cases with complications like intestinal obstruction or fistulas. Primary anastomosis is an option even in emergency surgery due to colonic perforation, while diverting operations are indicated for selected patient groups with a high risk profile. Several prospective studies showed good results for laparoscopic drainage and lavage in the setting of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis, though this concept needs to be controlled with randomized clinical trials before application into the daily practice. This article should provide a short overview of trends in the surgical treatment of diverticulitis, help to understand the natural history of the disease and thereby explain the currently lower frequency of surgical interventions for diverticulitis.

Treatment of intra-abdominal abscesses in Crohn's disease: a nationwide analysis of patterns and outcomes of care.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal abscesses are a common complication in Crohn's disease (CD). Percutaneous drainage of such abscesses has become increasingly popular and may deliver outcomes comparable to surgical treatment; however, such comparative data are limited from single-center studies. There have been no nationally representative studies comparing different treatment modalities for abdominal abscesses. METHODS: We identified all adult CD-related non-elective hospitalizations from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2007 that were complicated by an intra-abdominal abscess. Treatment modality was categorized into 3 strata-medical treatment alone, percutaneous drainage, and surgery. We analyzed the nationwide patterns in the treatment and outcomes of each treatment modality and examined for patient demographic, disease, or hospital-related disparities in treatment and outcome. RESULTS: There were an estimated 3,296 hospitalizations for abdominal abscesses in patients with CD. Approximately 39 % were treated by medical treatment alone, 29 % with percutaneous drainage, and 32 % with surgery with a significant increase in the use of percutaneous drainage since 1998 (7 %). Comorbidity burden, admission to a teaching hospital, and complicated Crohn's disease (fistulae, stricture) were associated with non-medical treatment. Use of percutaneous drainage was more common in teaching hospitals. Mean time to percutaneous drainage and surgical treatment were 4.6 and 3.3 days, respectively, and early intervention was associated with significantly shorter hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the nationwide pattern in the treatment of abdominal abscesses and demonstrate an increase in the use of percutaneous drainage for the treatment of this subgroup. Early treatment intervention was predictive of shorter hospitalization.

Epidemiological characteristics of 778 patients who underwent surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematomas in Brasília, Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematomas (CSDHs) are common in neurosurgical practice. There are no publications that report large series of the epidemiological characteristics of this pathology in Brazil. The purpose is to describe a large series of surgical cases and analyze the epidemiological and clinical characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with CSDH admitted into Neurosurgical Services at the Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil from 2006 to 2011. Age, sex, clinical feature, etiology, surgical procedure, side, clinical outcome, and recurrence were reviewed. Statistical tests were used to analyze data, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The series included 778 patients. There were 643 (82.6%) male patients with a mean age of 64.3 ± 15.9 (range, 14-93) years. The principal symptom was headache (58.9%). The most frequent origin was a fall (282 cases, 36.2%), but the origin remained unclear in 281 (36.1%) patients. Mild head injury occurred in 540 (69.4%) cases. Burr holes with drainage were used as the surgical procedure in 96.5% patients, and 687 (88.3%) patients had a positive outcome. Mortality was 0%. Recurrence was observed in 42 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of CSDHs is more common in elderly men. Treatment with burr holes and drainage is a simple and safe method for treatment. In our experience, CSDH presents decreased morbidity and mortality.

Chronic Subdural Hematoma Drainage Under Local Anesthesia with Sedation versus General Anesthesia and Its Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Burr hole drainage is the criterion standard treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), a common neurosurgical condition. However, apart from the surgical technique, the method of anesthesia also has a significant impact on postoperative patient outcome. Currently, there are limited studies comparing the use of local anesthesia with sedation (LA sedation) versus general anesthesia (GA) in the drainage of CSDH. The objective of this study was to compare the morbidity and mortality outcomes of using LA sedation versus GA in CSDH burr hole drainage. METHODS: This retrospective study presents a total of 257 operations in 243 patients from 2 hospitals. A total of 130 cases were operated under LA sedation in hospital 1 and 127 cases under GA in hospital 2. Patient demographics and presenting features were similar at baseline. RESULTS: Values are shown as LA sedation versus GA. Postoperatively, most patients recovered well in both groups with Glasgow Outcome Scale scores of 4-5 (96.2% vs. 88.2%, respectively). The postoperative morbidity was significantly increased by an odds ratio of 5.44 in the GA group compared with the LA sedation group (P = 0.005). The mortality was also significantly higher in the GA group (n = 5, 3.9%) than the LA sedation group (n = 0, 0.0%; P = 0.028). The CSDH recurrence rate was 4.6% in the LA sedation group versus 6.3% in the GA group. No intraoperative conversion from LA sedation to GA was reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that CSDH drainage under LA sedation is safe and efficacious, with a significantly lower risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity when compared with GA.