RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The mechanism of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hypersensitivity reactions is unknown. COVID-19 vaccine excipient skin testing has been used in evaluation of these reactions, but its utility in predicting subsequent COVID-19 vaccine tolerance is also unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine excipient skin testing in both patients with an allergic reaction to their first messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine dose and patients with a history of polyethylene glycol allergy who have not yet received a COVID-19 vaccine dose. METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective review, COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine excipient skin testing was performed in patients referred to 1 of 3 large tertiary academic institutions. Patient medical records were reviewed after skin testing to determine subsequent COVID-19 vaccine tolerance. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients underwent skin testing, in whom 12 patients (9.3%) had positive results. There were 101 patients who received a COVID-19 vaccine after the skin testing, which was tolerated in 90 patients (89.1%) with no allergic symptoms, including 5 of 6 patients with positive skin testing results who received a COVID-19 vaccine after the skin testing. The remaining 11 patients experienced minor allergic symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination, none of whom required treatment beyond antihistamines. CONCLUSION: The low positivity rate of COVID-19 vaccine excipient skin testing and high rate of subsequent COVID-19 vaccine tolerance suggest a low utility of this method in evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine hypersensitivity reactions. Focus should shift to the use of existing vaccine allergy practice parameters, with consideration of graded dosing when necessary. On the basis of these results, strict avoidance of subsequent COVID-19 vaccination should be discouraged.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , COVID-19 , Hipersensibilidad , Pruebas Cutáneas , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Inutilidad Médica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Excipientes de Vacunas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Vacunas de ARNm/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Background: As the vaccination campaign in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues, concerns with regard to adverse reactions to the vaccine remain. Although immediate hypersensitivity reactions have received much attention, delayed systemic urticarial reactions after vaccination can occur. Objective: To describe the clinical presentation, vaccine excipient skin testing results, and outcomes of subsequent COVID-19 vaccination in patients who experienced delayed systemic urticarial reactions after messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: This was a retrospective case series of 12 patients referred to the Mayo Clinics in Rochester, Minnesota, and Jacksonville, Florida, between January 19, 2021, and April 30, 2021, for evaluation of delayed systemic urticarial reactions after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Demographics, medical and allergic history, reaction details, vaccine excipient skin testing results (when performed), and the outcome after subsequent vaccination were collected for each patient. Results: The mean age of the patients was 52 years, all were white, and 9 (75%) were women. Half of the patients had a history of drug allergy, and one had a history of chronic spontaneous urticaria. Seven patients reacted to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and five reacted to the Moderna vaccine. Seven patients developed symptoms between 8 and 24 hours after vaccination. Nine patients required antihistamines for treatment. The median time to symptom resolution was 4 days. Nine patients underwent allergist-directed COVID-19 vaccine excipient skin testing, all of which were negative. Ten patients chose to receive their next mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose, and four patients experienced recurrent delayed urticaria. Conclusion: Delayed systemic urticarial reactions after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination were not life-threatening, could be treated with antihistamines, and were not predicted with vaccine excipient skin testing. They were not a contraindication to subsequent vaccination, although patients should be counseled with regard to the possibility of recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , COVID-19 , Urticaria , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Vacunas de ARNm/efectos adversos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Femenino , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Urticaria/inducido químicamente , Urticaria/diagnóstico , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Excipientes de Vacunas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
COVID-19-related mortality in high-risk individuals is substantial and current treatment options are limited. There is convincing evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines reduce the severity of infection and prevent deaths. Three COVID-19 vaccines are approved in the United Kingdom with many more in development. There are limited data on the triggers and mechanisms of anaphylaxis to these vaccines. We review the potential allergenic compounds in the COVID-19 vaccines and describe an innovative allergy support model for the vaccination hubs that allows most patients with severe allergy be immunized. Finally, we propose a practical algorithm for the investigations of anaphylaxis to these vaccines.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/terapia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/inmunología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/terapia , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Excipientes de Vacunas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Vaccination continues to be the single most important and successful public health intervention, due to its prevention of morbidity and mortality from prevalent infectious diseases. Severe immunologically mediated reactions are rare and less common with the vaccine than the true infection. However, these events can cause public fearfulness and loss of confidence in the safety of vaccination. In this paper, we perform a systematic literature search and narrative review of immune-mediated vaccine adverse events and their known and proposed mechanisms, and outline directions for future research. Improving our knowledge base of severe immunologically mediated vaccine reactions and their management drives better vaccine safety and efficacy outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad Tardía/inducido químicamente , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inducido químicamente , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/inducido químicamente , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/inmunología , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inmunología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/efectos de los fármacos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Pruebas Cutáneas , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Vacunación/mortalidad , Excipientes de Vacunas/efectos adversos , Vacunas/química , Vacunas/inmunologíaAsunto(s)
Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Excipientes de Vacunas/efectos adversos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/terapia , Vacuna BNT162 , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas Intradérmicas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently authorized the two messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 for emergency use against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing the COVID-19 coronavirus disease. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines were developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, respectively, in 2020. The United Kingdom, Bahrain, Canada, Mexico, United States, Singapore, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and European Union began their vaccination programs with the BNT162b2 vaccine, while the United States and Canada also started the mRNA-1273 vaccination program in mid December 2020. On 28th December 2020, studies reported severe allergic reactions in people who received the BNT162b2, and few people who received the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Authors of the letter thus attempt to explore possible causes of anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination.