RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Estimates of proportions of people with migraine who report premonitory symptoms vary greatly among previous studies. Our aims were to establish the proportion of patients reporting premonitory symptoms and its dependency on the enquiry method. Additionally, we investigated the impact of premonitory symptoms on disease burden using Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), whilst investigating how various clinical factors influenced the likelihood of reporting premonitory symptoms. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, premonitory symptoms were assessed among 632 patients with migraine. Unprompted enquiry was used first, followed by a list of 17 items (prompted). Additionally, we obtained clinical characteristics through a semi-structured interview. RESULTS: Prompted enquiry resulted in a greater proportion reporting premonitory symptoms than unprompted (69.9% vs. 43.0%; p < 0.001) and with higher symptom counts (medians 2, interquartile range = 0-6 vs. 1, interquartile range = 0-1; p < 0.001). The number of symptoms correlated weakly with HIT-6 (ρ = 0.14; p < 0.001) and WHODAS scores (ρ = 0.09; p = 0.041). Reporting postdromal symptoms or triggers increased the probability of reporting premonitory symptoms, whereas monthly migraine days decreased it. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a standardized and optimized method for assessing premonitory symptoms is necessary to estimate their prevalence and to understand whether and how they contribute to disease burden.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Cefalea , Fotofobia/epidemiología , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the distribution, clinical associations, and treatment responses for the most bothersome symptoms of migraine in a large sample of patients with migraine in Taiwan. BACKGROUND: The most bothersome symptom is recently recommended as a co-primary endpoint in clinical trials of acute treatment of migraine. However, most clinical trials and observational studies have been conducted in the United States and Europe, with photophobia representing the most common most bothersome symptom. METHODS: Patients who were newly diagnosed with migraine by headache specialists in Taipei Veterans General Hospital were recruited. All participants completed a questionnaire for headache profile, including the most bothersome symptom. Clinical associations of the most bothersome symptoms and response rates to previous acute treatments were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the recruited 1188 patients with migraine (female 79.4%, mean age 39.0 ± 12.1 years) in this cross-sectional study, nausea (n = 729/1188, 61.4%) was the most common symptom that was most bothersome, followed by phonophobia (n = 280/1188, 23.6%), and photophobia (n = 122/1188, 10.3%). The frequency ranking was the same regardless of sex and age. Compared to migraine without aura, migraine with aura was associated with photophobia (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.76-5.0, p < 0.001). Chronic migraine was associated with phonophobia (adjusted OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.13-2.01, p = 0.005), but there was a lower chance for nausea (adjusted OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88, p = 0.004), as the most bothersome symptom. Patients with different most-bothersome symptoms responded similarly to previous acute treatments, with an overall response rate of 52.2% (n = 550/1053). CONCLUSION: Patients with migraine in Taiwan reported a distinct ranking of the most bothersome symptom. However, the response rates of the most bothersome symptom and headache were similar, which supports the most bothersome symptom as an outcome measure for acute treatment of migraine. Further studies recruiting different populations are required to investigate regional differences in most bothersome symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Fotofobia , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Cefalea/complicaciones , Hospitales , Humanos , Hiperacusia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Náusea , Fotofobia/diagnóstico , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Taiwán/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the literature on the clinical characteristics of the symptoms other than headache that occurs during a migraine attack in childhood and adolescence. RECENT FINDINGS: Premonitory symptoms (42-67%) and postdrome phase (82%) are frequent. The most frequent auras were visual. There was no association between age or sex and the occurrence of auras. Cranial autonomic symptoms are also frequent (40-70%) and are most often bilateral. Most studies suggest that age is not associated with the frequency of nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. Cephalic cutaneous allodynia (15-37%) and osmophobia (20-53%) are common symptoms in children with migraine. Osmophobia has low sensitivity and high specificity for the diagnosis of migraine and is associated with the severity of the migraine. Migraine is a complex disease, and although headache is its best-known symptom, other symptoms also occur frequently during migraine attacks in children and adolescents.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Hiperacusia/complicaciones , Hiperacusia/etiología , Hiperalgesia , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Fotofobia/complicaciones , Fotofobia/epidemiología , VómitosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To observe the prevalence and characteristics of premonitory symptoms in Chinese migraineurs and explore their associations with migraine-related factors. METHOD: Migraineurs who visited a tertiary headache clinic and one of nine neurology clinics between May 2014 and November 2019 were studied. RESULT: Among the 4821 patients meeting the migraine criteria (International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition), 1038 (21.5%) patients experienced at least one premonitory symptom. The most common premonitory symptoms were neck stiffness, dizziness, yawning and drowsiness. The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that aura, photophobia, aggravation by routine physical activity, triggers, family history, depression, coffee consumption and physical exercise were associated with an increased probability of experiencing premonitory symptoms (p ≤ 0.001). The premonitory symptoms of migraine with and without aura differ in prevalence and most common symptoms. The cluster analysis revealed pairwise clustering of the following premonitory symptoms: Photophobia/phonophobia, concentration change/dysesthesia, loquacity/overactivity, yawning/drowsiness, fatigue/dizziness, and mood change/irritability. The correlation analysis of triggers and premonitory symptoms revealed that temperature change, environment change, sleep disorder, activity and stress were related to multiple premonitory symptoms, and that food, light, menstruation, alcohol and odor were related to special premonitory symptoms (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of premonitory symptoms among migraineurs in China is 21.5%. Some factors influence the probability of experiencing premonitory symptoms. Paired premonitory symptoms in the clustering analysis may share similar origins. Certain triggers associated with multiple premonitory symptoms may induce brain dysfunction; however, other triggers that overlap with corresponding special premonitory symptoms may be premonitory symptoms or a form of premonitory symptom.
Asunto(s)
Fatiga/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Migraña con Aura/epidemiología , Migraña sin Aura/epidemiología , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , China/epidemiología , Mareo , Femenino , Cefalea , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , BostezoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess photophobia and allodynia in subjects with post-traumatic headache and examine how these sensory hypersensitivities associate with clinical measures of disease burden. BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic headache is the most frequent and disabling long-term consequence of mild traumatic brain injury. There is evidence of sensory dysfunction in acute post-traumatic headache, and it is known from other headache conditions that sensory amplifications correlate with more severe disease. However, systematic studies in post-traumatic headache are surprisingly scarce. METHODS: We tested light and tactile sensitivity, along with measures of disease burden, in 30 persistent post-traumatic headache subjects and 35 controls. RESULTS: In all, 79% of post-traumatic headache subjects exhibited sensory hypersensitivity based on psychophysical assessment. Of those exhibiting hypersensitivity, 54% exhibited both light and tactile sensitivity. Finally, sensory thresholds were correlated across modalities, as well as with headache attack frequency. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, post-traumatic headache subjects with both light and tactile sensitivity had significantly higher headache frequencies and lower sensitivity thresholds to both modalities, compared to those with single or no sensory hypersensitivity. This pattern suggests that hypersensitivity across multiple modalities may be functionally synergistic, reflect a higher disease burden, and may serve as candidate markers of disease.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Costo de Enfermedad , Hiperalgesia/etiología , Fotofobia/etiología , Cefalea Postraumática/etiología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/etiología , Adulto , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central , Femenino , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Cefalea/epidemiología , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Hiperalgesia/diagnóstico , Hiperalgesia/epidemiología , Hiperalgesia/psicología , Masculino , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Fotofobia/psicología , Cefalea Postraumática/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
SIGNIFICANCE: This study reports the prevalence and relative risk of photophobia in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence and relative risk of photophobia in patients with TBI. DATA SOURCES: Three databases were used for literature search: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Publications reporting the prevalence of photophobia after TBI in patients of any age were included. A series of meta-regression analyses based on a generalized linear mixed model was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the prevalence estimates. RESULTS: Seventy-five eligible publications were identified. The prevalence of photophobia was 30.46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.05 to 40.88%) at 1 week after the injury. Prevalence decreased to 19.34% (95% CI, 10.40 to 28.27%) between 1 week and 1 month after TBI and to 13.51% (95% CI, 5.77 to 21.24%) between 1 and 3 months after the injury. The rapid decrease in the prevalence of photophobia in the first 3 months after a TBI injury was significant (P < .001). Three months post-TBI, the prevalence of photophobia leveled off to a near plateau with nonsignificant variability, increasing between 3 and 6 months (17.68%; 95% CI, 9.05 to 26.32%) and decreasing between 6 and 12 months since TBI (14.85%; 95% CI, 6.80 to 22.90%). Subgroup analysis of 14 publications that contained control data showed that the estimated risk ratio for photophobia was significantly higher in the TBI than in the control group during the entire 12 months after TBI. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: This study demonstrates that photophobia is a frequent complaint after TBI, which largely resolves for many individuals within 3 months after the injury. For some patients, however, photophobia can last up to 12 months and possibly longer. Developing an objective quantitative methodology for measuring photophobia, validating a dedicated photophobia questionnaire, and having a specific photophobia International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code would greatly improve data gathering and analysis.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Fotofobia , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Humanos , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Fotofobia/etiología , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Sensory hypersensitivities such as photophobia, phonophobia, and osmophobia are common in patients with migraine. We investigated the burden of these multiple sensory hypersensitivities in migraine. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 187 consecutive patients with migraine (26 men/161 women; age, 45.9 ± 13.2 years) were included. Sensory hypersensitivity symptoms such as photo-/phono-/osmophobia and accompanying symptoms were determined by neurologists in interviews. The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) was used to assess headache-related disability. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) was also administered. RESULTS: Photophobia, phonophobia and osmophobia were observed in 75.4%, 76.5% and 55.1% of the patients with migraine, respectively. A significant overlap in sensory hypersensitivities (photo-/phono-/osmophobia) was found; the proportions of patients with 2 and 3 coexisting sensory hypersensitivities were 33.2% and 41.7%, respectively. The MIDAS score was higher in those with 3 sensory hypersensitivity symptoms than in those with 0 to 2 sensory hypersensitivity symptoms. A generalized linear model with ordinal logistic regression analysis revealed that multiple sensory hypersensitivities, younger age, more migraine days per month, and a higher K6 score were significantly related to the higher MIDAS score. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that sensory hypersensitivities commonly occur and overlap in patients with migraine and that multiple sensory hypersensitivity symptoms have a significant impact on headache-related disability.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Cefalea , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Fotofobia/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To quantify photophobia in visual snow syndrome (VSS), a debilitating migraine-associated visual disturbance manifesting with continuous "TV snow-like" flickering dots in the entire visual field and additional visual symptoms, such as photophobia. METHODS: Photophobia was compared between 19 patients with VSS and 19 controls matched for age, sex, migraine and aura using the Leiden Visual Sensitivity Scale (L-VISS). RESULTS: Patients with VSS had an increased L-VISS-score compared to matched controls [(22.2 ± 5.9 vs. 4.4 ± 4.8; ANOVA, factors VSS and comorbid migraine: Main effect for VSS (F = 100.70; p < 0.001), but not for migraine (F < 0.01; p = 1.00) or the interaction (F = 1.93; p = 0.16)]. An L-VISS-score of 14 identified VSS with a sensitivity and specificity of 95% (Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis, 0.986 ± 0.014, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with VSS suffer continuously from photophobia at a level similar to chronic migraineurs during attacks. Although migraine and VSS share dysfunctional visual processing, patients with VSS might be more severely affected.
Asunto(s)
Migraña con Aura/diagnóstico , Migraña con Aura/epidemiología , Migraña sin Aura/diagnóstico , Migraña sin Aura/epidemiología , Fotofobia/diagnóstico , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine if patients with migraine who responded sufficiently to acute treatment were significantly different from those who did not in terms of patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and patient level of impairment, and to identify characteristics associated with insufficient response. BACKGROUND: Migraine is highly prevalent and impacts functional ability substantially. Current treatment approaches are not sufficiently meeting the needs of patients, and inadequate response to acute treatment is reported by at least 56% of patients with migraine in the United States. METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2014 Adelphi Migraine Disease-Specific Program, a cross-sectional survey. Using logistic regression, we assessed the association between patient factors and insufficient response. Responders were defined as patients with migraine who achieved pain freedom within 2 hours of acute treatment in ≥4 of 5 attacks, while insufficient responders achieved it in ≤3 of 5 attacks. RESULTS: Of 583 patients included, insufficient responders to acute treatment constituted 34.3% (200/583) of the study population. A statistically significantly larger proportion of insufficient responders vs responders had ≥4 migraine headache days/month (46.3% [88/190] vs 31% [114/368]), had ever been prescribed ≥3 unique preventive treatment regimens (11.7% [21/179] vs 6.3% [22/347]), and had chronic migraine, medication-overuse headaches, and comorbid depression (all P values ≤.05). Patient level of impairment was statistically significantly greater among insufficient responders vs responders. Factors associated with insufficient response after adjusting for covariates included Migraine Disability Assessment total score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, 95% CI [1.02, 1.05]), time of administration of acute treatment (OR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.15, 2.92]), depression (OR = 1.98, 95% CI [1.21, 3.23]), sensitivity to light not listed as current most troublesome symptom (OR = 2.30, 95% CI [1.21, 4.37]), and change in the average headache days per month before being prescribed an acute treatment vs now (OR = 1.75, 95% CI [1.05, 2.90]). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and health-related quality of life measures are statistically significantly different between insufficient responders and responders to acute treatment in patients with migraine.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacología , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Triptaminas/farmacología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/epidemiología , Femenino , Cefaleas Secundarias/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the rates of nausea, phonophobia, and photophobia reported overall and as the most bothersome symptom (MBS) in individuals with migraine and to identify individual characteristics associated with each of the 3 candidate MBSs. BACKGROUND: The MBS has emerged as an important coprimary efficacy endpoint in clinical trials of acute treatments for migraine, as recommended by the Food and Drug Administration. The current understanding of how persons with migraine designate an associated symptom as the most bothersome has been assessed primarily in the context of randomized trials. METHODS: Respondents (n = 95,821) in the cross-sectional, observational Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) study were adults (aged ≥18 years) recruited from a US nationwide online research panel. A validated diagnostic screener identified 15,133 individuals who met modified International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 beta criteria for migraine and reported at least 1 monthly headache day (MHD) over the previous 3 months. The survey ascertained sociodemographic variables, headache-related disability, MHDs, cutaneous allodynia, medication overuse, a migraine symptom severity score, pain interference, noncephalic pain, anxiety and depression symptoms, visual aura over the previous year, and acute treatment optimization. The current analysis is based on respondents who also completed a 6-month follow-up assessment that included questions about their most bothersome headache symptom. RESULTS: A total of 7518 respondents completed the 6-month follow-up, and 6045 met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The mean age of respondents was 47 (SD 13.4) years, 76.0% (4596/6045) were women, and 84.8% (5103/6017) were white. Among all respondents, 64.9% reported all 3 migraine symptoms. The MBS was photophobia in 49.1% (2967/6045), nausea in 28.1% (1697/6045), and phonophobia in 22.8% (1381/6045). Respondents reporting photophobia as the MBS were more likely to be men, to be obese, and to report visual aura. Those reporting nausea as the MBS were more likely to be women, to have lower incomes, and to report lower levels of treatment optimization. Respondents reporting phonophobia as the MBS were more likely to have cutaneous allodynia and less likely to have visual aura. CONCLUSION: Most people with migraine in the MAST observational study reported all 3 cardinal symptoms of nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. As in clinical trials, the most common MBS was photophobia. Patient profiles differed among the groups defined by their MBS.
Asunto(s)
Autoevaluación Diagnóstica , Hiperacusia , Trastornos Migrañosos , Náusea , Fotofobia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hiperacusia/diagnóstico , Hiperacusia/epidemiología , Hiperacusia/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Náusea/diagnóstico , Náusea/epidemiología , Náusea/etiología , Fotofobia/diagnóstico , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Fotofobia/etiología , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ictal symptoms, interictal symptoms, psychiatric comorbidities, and interictal neuro-otologic examination findings in vestibular migraine (VM). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 491 patients seen from August 2014 until March 2018 at a tertiary neurology referral center for vestibular disorders to identify patients fulfilling the 2012 VM criteria. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-one patients (105 women) were identified. Mean age of VM onset was 44.3 (±13.7) years. Preceding the onset of vestibular symptoms, most had migraine (57.3%) and motion sickness (61.1%). It was common to have a family history of migraine (50.8%) and episodic vestibular symptoms (28.1%). Common ictal symptoms were triggered (visually induced and head-motion) and spontaneous vertigo, accompanied by photophobia and phonophobia (118/131 [90.1%] patients), nausea (105/131 [80.2%] patients), aural symptoms (79/131 [60.3%] patients), and headache (65/131 [49.6%] patients). Interictally, many experienced visually induced (116/131 [88.6%] patients), head-motion (86/131 [65.6%] patients), and persistent (67/131 [51.1%] patients) dizziness. Psychiatric comorbidities include anxiety (92/131 [70.2%] patients), depression (53/131 [40.5%] patients), insomnia (38/131 [29.0%] patients), phobic disorders (15/131 [11.5%] patients), and psychogenic disorders (11/131 [8.4%] patients). Common triggers were stress (52/131 [39.7%] patients), bright lights (35/131 [26.7%] patients), weather changes (34/131 [26.0%] patients), and sleep deprivation (34/131 [26.0%] patients). Interictal neuro-otologic examination was abnormal in 56/131 (42.7%), usually hyperventilation-induced, head-shaking-induced, vibration-induced, and positional nystagmus. The most common balance-test finding was impaired sharpened Romberg's test (22/130 [16.9%] patients). CONCLUSIONS: In this single center study, we found that VM typically affects women in their 40s, with a personal and family history of migraine. Typical ictal symptoms were triggered and spontaneous vertigo, associated with photophobia and phonophobia, nausea, aural symptoms, and headache. Interictal vestibular symptoms, comorbid psychiatric disorders, and non-specific interictal neuro-otologic findings were common.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Examen Neurológico/métodos , Enfermedades Vestibulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vestibulares/fisiopatología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperacusia/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperacusia/epidemiología , Hiperacusia/fisiopatología , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Fotofobia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Fotofobia/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértigo/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértigo/epidemiología , Vértigo/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Vestibulares/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate postconcussive symptom reporting and recovery. SETTING: Public high school. PARTICIPANTS: Unmatched controls (n = 760); students who sustained a sports-related concussion (n = 77); matched controls (gender, grade, sport) (n = 77). DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal cohort study. OUTCOME MEASURE: Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing. RESULTS: At baseline, athletes who went on to sustain concussions were more likely than unmatched controls to be younger (P = .02), male (P = .001), and participate in different sports (P < .0001) such as football (concussed = 52%, unmatched controls = 20%). Differences were also noted regarding a previous history of concussion (P = .045; concussed athletes = 26%; unmatched control athletes = 16%) and lifetime number of concussions (P = .05). At baseline, those whose sustained concussions during the study period were more likely than matched controls to report numbness (P = .01) and concentration problems (P = .01) and more likely than unmatched controls to report dizziness (P = .02), sensitivity to light (P = .01), sensitivity to noise (P = .002), and numbness (P = .02). However, when data were reanalyzed and those with a previous history of concussion were removed, differences between those who sustained concussions during the study period and matched controls were no longer significant; when compared to unmatched controls, sensitivity to light (P = .01) and vision problems (P = .04) remained significant. Among those who sustained concussions, median time to recovery was 6 days (95% confidence interval: 4-9), and 71 out of 77 (92%) recovered by the fourth postinjury evaluation (median: 20 days postinjury). CONCLUSIONS: Course and time frame of recovery were variable. Data also suggest that a previous history of concussion may be contributing to baseline symptom reporting and highlight the potential enduring impact of history of concussion on sensorimotor function. However, further research as to whether preinjury measures of sensorimotor function may increase understanding regarding concussion risk is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Colorado/epidemiología , Mareo/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperacusia/epidemiología , Hipoestesia/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review investigates the relationship between sensory sensitivity and traumatic brain injury (TBI), and the role sensory sensitivity plays in chronic disability. RECENT FINDINGS: TBI is a significant cause of disability with a range of physical, cognitive, and mental health consequences. Sensory sensitivities (e.g., noise and light) are among the most frequently reported, yet least outwardly recognizable symptoms following TBI. Clinicians and scientists alike have yet to identify consistent nomenclature for defining noise and light sensitivity, making it difficult to accurately and reliably assess their influence. Noise and light sensitivity can profoundly affect critical aspects of independent function including communication, productivity, socialization, cognition, sleep, and mental health. Research examining the prevalence of sensory sensitivity and evidence for the association of sensory sensitivity with TBI is inconclusive. Evidence-based interventions for sensory sensitivity, particularly following TBI, are lacking.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/epidemiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/psicología , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Trastornos de la Sensación/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Sensación/psicología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Lesión Encefálica Crónica/epidemiología , Lesión Encefálica Crónica/psicología , Lesión Encefálica Crónica/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica , Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Humanos , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Fotofobia/psicología , Fotofobia/terapia , Prevalencia , Trastornos de la Sensación/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This multicentric survey investigates the prevalence and characteristics of Airplane Headache in children affected by primary headaches. METHODS: Patients with symptoms of Airplane Headache were recruited from nine Italian Pediatric Headache Centres. Each patient was handed a structured questionnaire which met the ICHD-III criteria. RESULTS: Among 320 children suffering from primary headaches who had flights during their lifetime, 15 (4.7%) had Airplane Headache, with mean age of 12.4 years. Most of the patients were females (80%). The headache was predominantly bilateral (80%) and localized to the frontal area (60%); it was mainly pulsating, and lasted less than 30 min in all cases. Accompanying symptoms were tearing, photophobia, phonophobia in most of the cases (73.3%). More than 30% of patients used medications to treat the attacks, with good results. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that Airplane Headache is not a rare disorder in children affected by primary headaches and highlights that its features in children are peculiar and differ from those described in adults. In children Airplane Headache prevails in females, is more often bilateral, has frequently accompanying symptoms and occurs at any time during the flight. Further studies are needed to confirm the actual frequency of Airplane Headache in the general pediatric population not selected from specialized Headache Centres, with and without other concomitant headache condition, and to better clarify the clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and potential therapies.
Asunto(s)
Aeronaves , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Viaje , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor/tendencias , Fotofobia/diagnóstico , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Viaje/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations between photophobia and seasonal variation of migraine. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, migraineurs consecutively recruited were referred to a specialist center located above the Arctic Circle at 68-71 degrees North during a 2.5-year period. Data were obtained through a structured interview. RESULTS: In total, 302 migraineurs with a mean (±SD) age of 35.5 (±12.6) years were included. Patients who reported seasonal variation of migraine (n = 90; 29.8%) also reported more often interictal photophobia than the others (61/90, 67.8% vs 92/212, 43.4%, P < .0001). Patients reported sunlight or other bright light to trigger migraine attacks in 74.4% with seasonal migraine (SM) compared with 40.6% in patients with non-seasonal migraine (NSM) (P < .0001), but there were similar frequencies of attacks reported to be triggered by sleep, menstruation, and other precipitating factors. After adjusting for migraine with aura, migraine disability, chronic migraine, interictal photophobia, and insomnia, sunlight or other bright light, photophobia was still associated with SM (OR; 3.47, CI [95%]; 1.83-6.59, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Migraineurs in a subarctic area reporting seasonal variation of attack frequency also report increased interictal photophobia independent of other clinical factors. Chronobiological mechanisms and/or increased activity in the visual system may be responsible for this phenomenon.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Fotoperiodo , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Estaciones del Año , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Noruega/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , TelemedicinaRESUMEN
The visual system is involved in different ways in migraine. Visual auras are the most common form of migraine aura. It may consist of positive or negative visual symptoms and cortical spreading depression is felt to be the phenomenon that underlies it. Even in migraine without aura, vision it is not totally excluded given that one of the major criteria for the diagnosis of migraine is photophobia. In persistent visual aura, patients refer symptoms defined as visual snow and television static. In retinal migraine unilateral decreased vision or complete visual loss occurs. Ophthalmoplegic migraine is characterized by palsy of one among the three ocular motor nerves. Migraine visual aura, particularly when occurring without headache, is a diagnosis of exclusion. Imaging studies and laboratory tests should exclude neurologic disease, included seizures and central nervous system tumor, ocular pathologies, carotid or cardiac disease, thrombosis and connective tissue disease.
Asunto(s)
Migraña con Aura/diagnóstico , Migraña con Aura/fisiopatología , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Visión/fisiopatología , Corteza Visual/fisiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Migraña con Aura/epidemiología , Fotofobia/diagnóstico , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Fotofobia/fisiopatología , Trastornos de la Visión/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although photophobia is a well-known symptom in various disorders, it has rarely been studied explicitly and its definition in a clinical setting can be somewhat elusive. Here, we assessed photophobia with a common psychometric tool in different conditions, in which light intolerance is considered part of the syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken in patients with migraine (MH), cluster headache (CH), tension-type headache (TH), essential blepharospasm (BS) and major depression (MD). Photophobia was assessed by the photophobia questionnaire (range 0-8). Symptom severity was measured in each patient group with appropriate scales. Finally, depression was assessed explicitly in each condition. RESULTS: Hundred and six subjects met the inclusion criteria (MH: 27, CH: 21, TH: 20, BS: 18, MD: 20). Photophobia scores differed between patient groups, with migraineurs showing the highest (6.63) and TH patients the lowest (2.10) scores (ranking: MH, BS, CH, MD and TH). Symptom severity as well as depression had little, if any, influence on the degree of photophobia. DISCUSSION: Photophobia is a core symptom of migraine but also constitutes a feature of other neurological conditions. The relative independence from other, disease-specific features, suggests that photophobia is a rather autonomous symptom.
Asunto(s)
Blefaroespasmo/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Cefaleas Primarias/epidemiología , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Blefaroespasmo/diagnóstico , Blefaroespasmo/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Femenino , Cefaleas Primarias/diagnóstico , Cefaleas Primarias/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fotofobia/diagnóstico , Fotofobia/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Based on recent findings and our own impressions we took a closer look at the relationship between (inter)ictal photophobia and psychometric variables in migraine patients with photophobia. FINDINGS: For this study we included 29 (27 female) migraine patients and 31 (18 female) controls with a mean age of 31.6 ± 12.5 years and 24.0 ± 4.1 years, respectively. All participants filled out the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). Interictal photophobia in patients was significantly higher than photophobia in controls (p = .001). Patients showed statistically significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms (p < .001), anxiety symptoms (p < .001) and stress (p < .001) than controls. Among all participants, (interictal) photophobia correlated positively with age (rho = .318, p = .013) as well as with the levels of depressive symptoms (rho = .459, p < .001), anxiety symptoms (rho = .346, p = .008) and stress (rho = .368, p = .005), but not with gender. In the patients, ictal photophobia correlated positively with age (rho = .473, p = .01) and interictal photophobia (rho = .423, p = .022). Linear regression analysis revealed only a trend towards statistical significance for (interictal) photophobia as a predictor for the level of depressive symptoms (rho = .457, p = 0.056) in the whole sample. CONCLUSIONS: Considering higher levels of photophobia in depression and the comorbidity of migraine and depression, it might be possible that depression contributes to interictal photophobia in patients with migraine. The same may be true for anxiety and stress. Both are also related to migraine and their possible impact on photophobia in migraine may be explained by pupillary dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/psicología , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Adulto , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/fisiopatología , Comorbilidad , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Estimulación Luminosa , Fotofobia/diagnóstico , Fotofobia/fisiopatología , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
Femtosecond laser has been introduced in refractive surgery to create a thin-hinged corneal flap without using any blade. The current review was planned to analyse and compare femtosecond-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), the latest refractive procedure, with conventional techniques in refractive surgery. The analysis showed that femtosecond-assisted LASIK yielded more predictable corneal flaps, lesser ocular aberrations, better uncorrected visual acuity, lesser variations in intraocular pressure (IOP) and fewer chances of developing dry eyes. Transient light sensitivity, diffuse lamellar keratitis, opaque bubble layer, corneal haze and rainbow glare are some of the demerits of femtosecond-assisted LASIK, but these can be prevented with certain precautions. The early visual rehabilitation and preservation of corneal anatomy are added benefits in the long run. Though it is expensive currently, the competition in market is expected to cut down the cost soon.
Asunto(s)
Queratomileusis por Láser In Situ/instrumentación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Deslumbramiento , Humanos , Queratitis/epidemiología , Queratomileusis por Láser In Situ/métodos , Fotofobia/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Refractivos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Refractivos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most patients with migraine report photophobia associated with headache; a subset report interictal photophobia. These patients are light sensitive even during headache-free periods. The objective of this case-control study was to assess the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression in migraine patients with and without interictal photophobia. METHODS: We recruited 16 subjects with migraine and interictal photophobia, 16 age- and gender-matched migraine subjects without interictal photophobia, and 16 age- and gender- matched controls. Migraine subjects met International Headache Society classification criteria. Participants completed a photophobia questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Chi-square analyses and two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for the analyses. RESULTS: Subjects with interictal photophobia had significantly higher scores on the photophobia questionnaire compared to subjects without interictal photophobia. Subjects with interictal photophobia had significantly higher scores on the BDI-II and BAI compared to subjects without interictal photophobia. CONCLUSIONS: Migraine patients with interictal photophobia are more likely to manifest symptoms of depression and anxiety compared to migraine patients without interictal photophobia. Care providers should be aware of increased prevalence of these symptoms in this population and consider appropriate referrals. Future research could assess whether treatment of photophobia leads to improvements in symptoms of depression and anxiety in migraine patients.