Comparative Analysis of Intramedullary Nail versus Plate Fixation for Fibula Fracture in Supination External Rotation Type IV Ankle Injury.

BACKGROUND Lateral malleolus fractures, typically from trauma, sports, or accidents, are common, with supination external rotation (SER) injuries being most prevalent. SER injuries involve complex joint mechanics and often necessitate surgical intervention for instability. This study compares intramedullary nail and plate fixation for fibula fractures in SER type IV ankle injuries, considering their biomechanical properties and influence on fracture healing. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective, randomized study was conducted between January 2021 and December 2021. A total of 81 patients with SER injuries were included in the study. Surgical procedures were performed using either intramedullary nails or plates. The following parameters were recorded and analyzed: postoperative complications, operation times, bone healing times, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, and ankle range of motion. RESULTS Out of the 81 cases, 42 were treated with intramedullary nails, while 39 received plate fixation. Statistical analysis revealed a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications in the intramedullary nail group than in the the plate fixation group (9.52% vs 30.77%, P<0.0164). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of operation time, bone healing time, AOFAS scores, VAS scores, and functional evaluations (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Plate fixation and intramedullary nail fixation are effective techniques for treating fibula fractures in SER type IV injuries. However, intramedullary nail fixation demonstrates a lower rate of complications. Therefore, intramedullary nails may be preferable to plate fixation for the management of fibula fractures in SER type IV ankle injuries.

Not Just Small Adults: Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment in Adolescent Tibial Shaft Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for tibial shaft fractures in young children is nonoperative management, while in adults, operative treatment is considered the mainstay. There are no clear guidelines on preferred treatment for adolescents. PURPOSE: This paper aims to 1) identify clinical and radiographic characteristics predictive of malalignment and 2) determine if treatment type affects malalignment risk. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified patients aged 12 to 16 years old with a tibial shaft fracture at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center. The primary outcome of interest was malalignment, classified as meeting one or more of the following: >5° coronal angulation, >5° sagittal angulation, translation (cortical width or 100% displaced), and/or rotational deformity. Comparative analyses were done to identify risk factors for malalignment. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were included-initial treatment was "planned nonoperative" for 102 patients and "planned operative" for 60 patients. The malalignment rate was 34% in the planned nonoperative group versus 32% in the planned operative group. In a multivariate regression, older patients [odds ratio (OR)=-0.07, 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.01; P =0.024] and those with 100% initial displacement (OR=-0.35, 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.05; P =0.021) had decreased odds of malalignment, and having increased sagittal angulation (OR=0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.04; P =0.002) and a fibula fracture (OR=0.22, 95% CI: 0.03-0.41; P =0.023) increased the odds of malalignment. There was no difference in the rate of malalignment by initial treatment ( P =0.289). Having a planned nonoperative treatment (OR=22.7, 95% CI: 14.0-31.5; P <0.001) and having a fibula fracture (OR=8.52, 95% CI: 0.59-16.45; P =0.035) increased the time immobilized. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into factors affecting tibial shaft fracture alignment among patients aged 12 to 16 years. This study suggests that the risk of malalignment is higher among patients with increased initial sagittal angulation and concomitant fibula fractures, but the risk of malalignment is comparable in patients initially treated nonoperatively and operatively. Although healing parameters on average were similar, nonoperative treatment results in longer immobilization time and time for unrestricted weight bearing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

The role of fibula fixation in combined distal-third tibia and fibula fractures: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The role of concomitant fibula fracture fixation in distal-third tibia fractures regarding alignment, union, and functional outcome is still a topic of debate. In this review, we summarize the available comparative literature regarding fibula fixation in distal third lower leg fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review of articles published between January 2000 and January 2022 in the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases about this topic was performed. RESULTS: 746 unique studies were identified of which four randomized-controlled trials and six retrospective studies were included. Nine studies compared alignment after tibia fixation with or without fibula fixation, six studies reported on tibial union, and three studies reported on functional outcome between groups. Pooling of data was not possible due to varying outcome measures and inclusion criteria. Fibula fixation was associated with less rotational malalignment, while there does not seem to be consensus regarding the effect on sagittal and coronal alignment. Six studies reported on the effect of fibula fixation on tibial union. None of these studies found a significant difference between treatment modalities. Furthermore, one out of three studies reporting functional outcome described a marginal beneficial functional outcome after fibula fixation. Ultimately, no differences in complication rates between treatment modalities were described. CONCLUSION: Fixation of the fibula in distal-third lower leg fractures does not seem to have a significant effect on coronal and sagittal tibial alignment. Furthermore, fibula fixation is associated with significantly less rotational malalignment, although the clinical importance of this finding is questionable as true differences in rotational alignment between treatment modalities are small. Finally, fibula fixation does not affect union, functional outcome, or complication rate as adjuvant to tibia fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

A comparison of outcomes of locking versus non-locking plate fixation for the distal fibula fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: A locking plate (LP) or non-locking plate (NLP) can be used for distal fibula fracture fixation. However, the advantages of LP over NLP in patients with distal fibula fractures are not clear. In terms of indications, the role of the two plates probably differs; however, to draw comparative conclusions, we conceptualized this systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that directly compared the two plates, wherein both groups' indications and baseline parameters were similar. METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed using PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing the LP versus NLP fixation for the lateral malleolus fracture. A total of 18 studies were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients aged < 55 years and patients aged > 55 years. The statistical analysis was performed by Review Manager Software version 5.4.1. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of 4243 fractures was performed across 18 studies. The rate of fracture union and overall complication rates did not differ between the two fixation groups with an OR of 0.71 (95% CI 0.26, 1.96, p = 0.51 and 1.11 (95% CI 0.84, 1.47, p = 0.47, respectively. There is no difference in the reoperation rate due to minor or major complications between the two groups. There was no difference in functional outcome (MD -0.85, with 95% CI -5.63, 3.93, p = 0.73), but NLP has a shorter surgical duration (MD 3.0, with 95% CI 0.26, 5.75, p = 0.03). A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis performed for overall complications affected the final outcome of the meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates no clear benefit in selecting LP over NLP for the fixation of lateral malleolus fractures.

Risk factors for malalignment after intramedullary nail treatment of distal tibia fractures with associated fibula fractures.

PURPOSE: Malalignment of distal tibia fractures can lead to malunion/nonunion or alter the limb mechanical axis which may cause arthritis. Proposed methods to decrease malalignment include fibular fixation or multiplanar interlocking screws, however these remain controversial. This study aimed to identify factors associated with malalignment in distal tibial fractures with associated fibular shaft fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of distal tibia fractures with associated fibular shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing at two level one trauma centers between 2015 and 2019. Cases involving malalignment (> 5° of deviation from anatomic axis on either coronal/sagittal axis) on final follow-up (minimum three months postoperatively) were compared to those without malalignment with regard to demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative characteristics, and complications. RESULTS: The rate of malalignment was 13%. On multivariate analysis, multiplanar distal interlocking screw fixation (odds ratio [OR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.92) was associated with a decreased rate of final malalignment, while nail diameter > 10 mm was associated with a higher rate (OR, 4.05; 95% CI 1.25-13.11). Fibular fixation was not associated with malalignment. CONCLUSION: Multiplanar distal interlocking screws may protect against malalignment. Fibula fixation does not appear associated with a decreased rate of malalignment in distal tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Intramedullary Screw Fixation Versus Traditional Plating for Distal Fibula Fractures.

The traditional method of treating fibular fractures in unstable ankle injuries involves open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and screw construct. Less invasive percutaneous fixation techniques with intramedullary fibular screws have been utilized for many years to reduce wound and implant complications while maintaining a stable ankle mortise. However, there have been no direct case-control studies comparing percutaneous intramedullary fibular screw fixation to the traditional open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws. In our study, we compared radiographic and clinical outcomes for unstable ankle fractures in which the fibula fracture was treated with either a percutaneous intramedullary screw or by open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and screw construct. We retrospectively reviewed 69 consecutive patients from 2011 to 2019 with unstable ankle fractures treated with intramedullary fibular screws and compared them to 216 case-control patients treated with traditional plate and screw construct over the same time period. The average follow-up for the intramedullary screw group was 11.5 months and 15.2 months for the plate and screw group. We collected general demographic data, measured intraoperative and final follow-up talocrural angles, Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade, union rates, implant removal rates, infection rates, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scores. The intramedullary screw group had a statistically significant lower rate of delayed implant removal (8.7% vs 23.6%) and there was no detectable difference in other measures.

Outcome After Treatment of Distal Fibula Fractures Using One-Third Tubular Plate, Locking Compression Plate or Distal Anatomical Locking Compression Plate.

Surgical treatment of lateral distal fibula fractures is associated with high risk of reoperation and complications. The primary aim was to report risks of surgical site infection (SSI) and reoperation ≤1 year after treatment with one-third tubular plate, locking compression plate (LCP) or distal anatomical LCP. Secondary to investigate associations between patient, fracture and operative factors and risk of SSI and reoperation. Retrospectively, we evaluated a consecutive cohort of 588 patients having osteosynthesis of distal fibula with a one-third tubular plate (n = 417), LCP (n = 115) or distal anatomical LCP plate (n = 56) at Bispebjerg Hospital, Denmark from January 2010 to December 2015 with 1-year follow-up. The risk of SSI was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12-18) after treatment with one-third tubular plate, 30% (95% CI 23-39) after LCP and 41% (95% CI 29-54) after distal anatomical LCP. We found a significant association of SSI and LCP (p = .005) and distal anatomical LCP (p < .001). Other factors associated with increased risk of SSI were age>70 years (p < .001), smoking (p = .004), DM (p = .007), surgery time ≥90 minutes (p = .006) and surgery delay of 3-6 days (p = .007). The risk of reoperation ≤1 year was 10% (95% CI 6-11) for one-third tubular plate, 21% (95% CI 14-29) for LCP and 25% (95% CI 16-38) for distal anatomical LCP. We found a significant association between distal anatomical LCP and risk of reoperation (p = .008). The only other risk factor associated with risk of reoperation was surgery delay of more than 7 days (p = .004). We conclude that LCP plate and the distal anatomical LCP plate should only be used after careful considerations.

A Retrospective Analysis of Distal Fibula Fractures Treated With Intramedullary Fibular Nail Fixation.

There is growing literature supporting the use of intramedullary fixation for fracture care because of its smaller incisions, improved biomechanical outcomes, and faster time to weightbearing than traditional internal fixation methods. The aim of this study is to investigate the postoperative outcomes in ankle fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation in the largest patient cohort to date. From 2015 to 2021, 151 patients were evaluated following surgical treatment of fibular fractures with intramedullary nail fixation. Patients were identified through a medical record database search for appropriate ankle fracture procedure codes. Patient information was reviewed for fracture type, adjunct procedures, time to weightbearing and postoperative complications. Radiographs were assessed for quality and time to radiographic union. The mean time to weightbearing was 4.8 weeks. Minor wound dehiscence was identified in 2 patients (1.3%). Superficial infection was present in 4 patients (2.6%) and a deep infection developed in 2 patients (1.3%). Two patients developed a nonunion (1.5%). There were no DVTs reported, although 1 patient developed a PE postoperatively. Radiographic quality of reduction and time to union is comparable to literature reported plate and screw construct outcomes. Reduction was classified as good in 86.1% of patients and radiographic union was appreciated in 98.5% of patients. This is the largest cohort study evaluating the outcomes of intramedullary nail fixation for ORIF of ankle fractures. These data reinforce that intramedullary nailing provides a minimally invasive approach with accurate anatomic reduction, excellent fracture union rates, low complication rates, and an early return to weightbearing.

Anatomical Augmentation Using Suture Tape for Acute Syndesmotic Injury in Maisonneuve Fracture: A Case Report.

Ankle syndesmosis is crucial to the integrity of the ankle joint and weight-bearing; an injury to this structure can lead to significant disability. The treatment methods for distal syndesmosis injuries are controversial. The representative treatment methods include transsyndesmotic screw fixation and suture-button fixation, and good results with suture tape augmentation have recently been reported. However, an augmentation using suture tape is only possible when the posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) is intact. This study describes the case of an unstable syndesmosis injury, accompanied by anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) and PITFL injuries, which were treated successfully using suture tape. A 39-year-old male patient sustained right ankle damage while skateboarding. His leg and ankle radiographs revealed a widening of the medial clear space, a posterior malleolus fracture, a reduced "syndesmosis overlap" compared with the contralateral side, and a proximal fibula fracture. The magnetic resonance imaging revealed ruptured deltoid ligaments, accompanied by AITFL, PITFL, and interosseous ligament injuries. A diagnosis of a Maisonneuve fracture with an unstable syndesmotic injury was made. The patient underwent an open syndesmotic joint reduction, along with an AITFL and PITFL augmentation. This anatomical reduction was confirmed using intraoperative arthroscopy and postoperative computed tomography (CT). An axial CT that was performed at the 6-month follow-up exam revealed a similar alignment of the syndesmosis between the injured and uninjured sides. There were no surgical complications and the patient did not complain of discomfort in his daily life. At the 12-month follow-up exam, a good clinical outcome was confirmed. As a treatment for unstable syndesmosis injury, ligament augmentation using suture tape shows satisfactory clinical outcomes and can be considered as a useful and reliable method for anatomical restoration and rapid rehabilitation.

Maisonneuve ankle fracture.

Maisonneuve fracture (MF) is defined as an ankle fracture-dislocation associated always with a fracture of the proximal quarter of the fibula and rupture of the anterior and interosseous tibiofibular ligaments. Other injuries are variable. Recent CT studies have demonstrated that MF is a far more complex injury than initially supposed. Therefore it is necessary to change substantially the current concepts related to this issue. MF is combined in about 80% of cases with a fracture of the posterior malleolus and also with malposition of the distal fibula in the fibular notch. An exact assessment of these injuries requires post-injury CT examination which should be used as a standard in MFs. The main goal of treatment is anatomical reduction of the distal fibula into the fibular notch. In case of avulsion of a larger fragment of the posterior malleolus, it is necessary to perform as the first step its reduction and fixation from the posterolateral approach and thus restore integrity of the notch. Closed reduction of the distal fibula is associated with malposition in up to 50% of cases and therefore open reduction from a short anterolateral approach is preferred. Accuracy of reduction should be always checked by postoperative CT scan.

Do associated proximal fibula fractures help predict the severity of tibial plateau fractures?

PURPOSE: Proximal fibula fractures are often associated with tibial plateau fractures, but their relationship is poorly characterized. The purpose of this study was to better define the relationship between tibial plateau injury severity and presence of associated soft tissue injuries. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on all operatively treated tibial plateau fractures at a Level 1 trauma center over a 5-year period. Patient demographics, injury radiographs, CT scans, operative reports and follow-up were reviewed. RESULTS: Queried tibial plateau fractures from 2014 to 2019 totaled 217 fractures in 215 patients. Fifty-two percent were classified as AO/OTA 41B and 48% were AO/OTA 41C. Thirty-nine percent had an associated proximal fibula fracture. The presence of a proximal fibula fracture had significant correlation with AO/OTA 41C fractures, as compared with AO/OTA 41B fractures (chi-square, p < 0.001). Of the patients with a lateral split depression type tibial plateau fracture, the presence of a proximal fibula fracture was associated with more articular comminution, measured by number of articular fragments (mean = 4.0 vs. 2.9 articular fragments, p = 0.004). There was also a higher rate of meniscal injury in patients with proximal fibula fractures (37% vs. 20%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant relationship between the higher energy tibial plateau fracture type (AO/OTA 41C) and the presence of an associated proximal fibula fracture. The presence of a proximal fibula fracture with a tibial plateau fracture is an indicator of a higher energy injury and a higher likelihood of meniscal injury.

Can CT-based assessment of lateral malleolus anatomy indicate when and how to perform an intramedullary fixation in distal fibula fractures? An analysis of 150 ankles.

PURPOSE: The primary aim was to analyse the lateral malleolus morphology with a focus on the shape of the distal fibula for IM fixation of the fibula in infra- and transsyndesmotic fracture patterns. The secondary aim was to propose a treatment algorithm according to the lateral malleolar anatomy. METHODS: 77 healthy, skeletally mature volunteers underwent CT scanning of the ankle. The fibula medullary canal and its cortical thickness were quantitatively analysed at 4 different levels measured from the fibular tip (1.5 cm, 3.0 cm, 4.5 cm, and 6.0 cm). A geometric classification was proposed, and a decision algorithm was developed. Statistical significance was set at a p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: The smallest diameter of the medullary canal of the fibula was at 6.0 cm from the tip of the fibula, in 98.2% of the ankles. The distal fibula can be classified into triangular and rectangular type, according to the cortical thickness index (p < 0.0001). In 16.7% ankles, the internal diameter of the fibula at 6.0 cm was equal or narrower than 3.5 mm (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The shape of the distal fibula as evaluated by CT-guided analysis allows for IM osteosynthesis of the lateral malleolus in 83% of individuals. In our study, the smallest diameter of the medullary canal of the fibula was located 6.0 cm from the tip of the lateral malleolus. Coronal CT evaluation is advantageous in indicating which type of IM implant should be used safely for infra- and transsyndesmotic fracture patterns, potentially reducing intraoperative risks.

Biplane Reduction: A Novel Technique for Restoring Fibula Length in Maisonneuve Fracture.

OBJECTIVE: Fibular length is important for ankle stability. Failure to adequately restore and stabilize fibula length may result in malunion, hindering postoperative functional exercises and recovery of ankle function. However, there is no unified and effective reduction method for fibular shortening in Maisonneuve fractures. In this study, we introduce the biplane reduction as an effective surgical technique for restoring the length of the fibula in Maisonneuve fractures. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 12 patients preoperatively diagnosed with Maisonneuve fractures between June 2019 and June 2022. All patients underwent our biplane reduction technique to restore the length of their fibula. Operation time, hospital stay, complications, FTA (the angle between the fibular tip and the superior articular surface of the talus), visual analog pain score, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score were recorded. An independent sample t-test was used for component comparisons, and a paired sample t-test or one-way analysis of variance was used for intra-group comparisons. RESULTS: No patient was lost to follow-up and no obvious postoperative complications were observed. After operation, FTA recovered from 37.52 ± 0.37 ° to 40.42 ± 0.43 °, which was significantly improved compared with that before operation (p < 0.01). At the last follow-up, both the VAS and AOFAS scores showed significant improvement compared to pre-surgery scores. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction technique proposed in this study to restore the length of the fibula in Maisonneuve fractures is simple and effective, does not require special equipment, and has the advantage of directly examining the reduction condition.

Management of Pediatric Supination-inversion Ankle Injuries Involving Distal Tibia and Intraepiphyseal Distal Fibula Fractures.

Pediatric ankle fractures are prevalent injuries that make up a notable portion of all periphyseal injuries. The Salter-Harris classification is the most popular classification about physeal and periepiphyseal injuries. Ogden expanded on this and described type 7 fractures which are completely intraepiphyseal and include propagation of the fracture from the articular surface through the epiphyseal cartilage and do not involve the physis. These injuries are common about the distal fibula in pediatric patients with supination-inversion type injuries. There are no specific guidelines or recommendations on treatment of these injuries in the literature. We present three cases of this injury pattern and describe our chosen management that leads each patient to full, painless ankle range of motion and return to all prior activities and sports without complication. Supination-inversion type pediatric ankle fractures are common injuries that all orthopaedic surgeons will encounter at some point throughout their practice or training. Recognizing fracture variants and understanding treatment options of pediatric ankle fractures are important for the orthopaedic community as a whole.

Fracture gap and working length are important actionable factors affecting bone union after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of simple diaphyseal or distal metaphyseal tibia fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Indirect reduction of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) can often result in delayed union in tibia fractures. This study evaluated several factors in MIPO in relation to bone union. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the fracture gap, plate - tibia distance, or working length would have a substantial effect on the tibia union rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with simple diaphyseal or distal metaphyseal tibia fractures who underwent internal fixation surgery using the MIPO technique were divided into two groups: patients with delayed union and patients without delayed union. Non-actionable factors involving AO/OTA classification, fibula fracture and actionable factors including postoperative fracture gap, plate - tibia distance, working length in relation to parameters of bone union were compared between the two groups. Also cumulative rates of bone union and risk factors of delayed union according to variables of interest were investigated. RESULTS: AO/OTA classification, site of fibula fracture, postoperative fracture gap, working length, and bone union rate of the two groups significantly differed (p<0.05). The cumulative rate of bone union during 1-year follow-up according to 43A tibia fracture, distal fibula fracture, fracture gap, and working length significantly differed between the two groups (p<0.05). By univariate Cox proportional hazards model, 43A tibia fracture, distal fibula fracture, facture gap, and short working length were risk factors for delayed union (p<0.05). DISCUSSION: Non-actionable factors involving AO/OTA classification, distal fibula fracture and actionable factors including postoperative fracture gap, working length were significant factors affecting bone union after MIPO. The present study indicated that small fracture gap and long working length during MIPO might facilitate bone healing in tibia fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; single-center retrospective cohort study.

Healed ORIF in a fibula fracture - Hardware removal or hardware retention for the fibula in a patient with minor symptoms?

HISTORY: - A 31yo female is involved in a fall while climbing on some wet rocks. She was brought into the emergency department and was found to have suffered a closed fracture of the right fibula with a deltoid ligament injury. Distal neurovascular exam was normal. She is otherwise unhurt. She had ORIF of her ankle injury and it has gone onto heal with good results. She comes back at 6 months and complains of vague pain over her lateral ankle and hardware with a normal physical exam. She wonders about hardware removal, (Figs. 1 and 2). PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: - previous history of breast reduction surgery and she has delivered one child vaginally. No chronic diseases and she takes no pills except the birth control pill. SOCIAL HISTORY: - married with one child and works as an administrative assistant for a manufacturing company; she is a social drinker and nonsmoker. Has a history of using some recreational drugs but none for 10 years. She is moderately active.

Maisonneuve fracture treated with short leg cast: A case report with 41-month follow-up.

RATIONALE: Maisonneuve fracture is a specific type of severe ankle injury. To our current knowledge, once a Maisonneuve fracture is diagnosed, the surgery is always recommended for fear of sequelae from inaccurate joint reconstruction. However, in this case, we treated a Maisonneuve fracture with a short leg cast, and the 41-month follow-up showed a favorable outcome with no post-traumatic osteoarthritis, chronic pain, and instability. Therefore, this case provides evidence for the feasibility of conservative treatment of Maisonneuve fracture. PATIENT CONCERNS: A female patient in her early twenties sprained her left ankle while running, suffering regional pain, swelling, and limited mobility. DIAGNOSES: We diagnosed a Maisonneuve fracture with superior fibular fracture and Volkmann tuberosity fracture, a slight separation of inferior tibiofibular syndesmosis (ITS). INTERVENTIONS: The patient rejected our surgical recommendations in favor of nonsurgical treatment, in addition to refusing immobilization of the knee. Consequently, we had to treat her with a short leg cast for 8 weeks and asked her to return for regular follow-up visits. OUTCOMES: At the final follow-up, the radiography showed complete healing of proximal fibula fracture. The patient reported no discernible subjective differences between her bilateral ankles. The range of motion of the left ankle was measured at 22° of dorsiflexion and 40° of plantarflexion. Functional assessments using Olerud-Molander ankle scale and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot scale both scored 100 points. Additionally, the radiographic assessment classified arthritis as stage 0 according to Morrey-Wiedeman classification. LESSONS: To avoid missing and misdiagnosing, the physical examination should always extend to 2 neighboring joints. Secondly, if a Maisonneuve fracture is suspected, further computed tomography scans, radiography, and magnetic resonance imaging can help to determine the stability of the ITS and the integrity of the lateral collateral ligaments before making therapeutic decisions. Finally, considering the lateral collateral ligaments may remain intact, we recommend stabilizing ITS by repairing the medial ligaments, which can be conducted arthroscopically and be more minimally invasive, providing an elastic fixation that aligns better with the biomechanics of the ITS which is characterized as a micro-mobile rather than fully fixed joint.

Preventing Iatrogenic Fibula Fractures Using the Push-Pull Technique: A Biomechanical Comparison of Unicortical Versus Bicortical Post Screws.

BACKGROUND: Displaced diaphyseal fractures can be reduced using the push-pull technique, wherein a plate is affixed to the distal fragment of the fracture, a post screw is placed proximal to the plate, and a lamina spreader creates distraction. This study evaluated the load to failure and mechanism of failure of bicortical and unicortical post screws during reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four matched pairs of cadaver legs were subjected to a 2-cm oblique osteotomy simulating a displaced, oblique diaphyseal fracture. A 6-hole compression plate was affixed to the distal fragment with 2 unicortical locking screws, and a 12-mm unicortical or 20-mm bicortical screw was inserted as a post screw proximal to the plate. A lamina bone spreader was used to exert a distraction force between the plate and the post screw. A mechanical actuator simulated the distraction procedure until failure. Maximum applied load, displacement, and absorbed energy were recorded and compared across unicortical and bicortical groups by paired t tests. RESULTS: At maximum load, we found statistically significant differences in displacement (P=.003) and energy absorbed (P=.022) between the two groups. All unicortical screws failed through screw toggle and bone cut-out. Bicortical screws failed through bending, with no visible damage to the bone at the screw site. CONCLUSION: When diaphyseal fractures are significantly shortened and require a greater distraction force to achieve reduction, bicortical screws demonstrate a higher mechanical load to failure and increased bone loss from the screw-removal site. A unicortical post screw may be used if minimal distraction is needed. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(5):308-312.].

Investigation of the Characteristics and Mechanism of Interosseous Membrane Injuries in Typical Maisonneuve Fracture.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies on the mechanism and scope of interosseous membrane injury in Maisonneuve fractures have been inconsistent. In order to better guide clinical treatment, the characteristics and mechanism of interosseous membrane injuries and proximal 1/3 fibular fracture in typical Maisonneuve fracture were investigated. METHODS: The study comprised 15 patients between January 2019 and June 2021 with Maisonneuve fracture. All patients received X-ray and MRI examination of the calf and ankle joint, and CT scanning of the ankle joint. The injuries of medial structure, inferior tibiofibular syndesmosis, fibula, posterior malleolus, and interosseous membrane were evaluated. RESULTS: MR images of the calf showed that the injury of interosseous membrane (IOM) was from the syndesmosis to the proximal fibular fracture site in two patients, with a range of 32.3 and 29.8 cm, respectively. In the other 13 patients, the IOM rupture was not only confined to the distal third of the calf, but also close to the fibula fracture, and the IOM was intact between the two fracture sites. The range of distal IOM rupture was 3.7-12.2 cm, with an average of 8.06 ± 2.35 cm. The proximal IOM was completely ruptured from the fibular side at the site of the fibular fracture and the range was 4.1-9.1 (average: 6.75 ± 1.64) cm. The average length of the integrate middle segment of the IOM was 14.55 ± 4.11 (5.6-20.3) cm. MR images of the calf also showed partial rupture of the posterior tibial muscle at the ending point on the fibula in 15 cases, partial rupture of soleus muscle and flexor hallucis longus in seven cases. CONCLUSIONS: The rupture of the IOM was caused by a combination of abduction and external rotation violence. It was manifested in two forms, most of which was not only distal end but also near fibular fracture site ruptures with the middle part intact, and a few were ruptures of the IOM from the ankle to the near fibular fracture site. The tibialis posterior muscle may be related to the location of the fibular fracture.

Biomechanical analysis of different internal fixation methods for special Maisonneuve fracture of the ankle joint based on finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different internal fixation methods for Maisonneuve fractures under physiological loading conditions. METHODS: Finite element analysis was used to numerically analyze various fixation methods. The study focused on high fibular fractures and included six groups of internal fixation: high fibular fracture without fixation + distal tibiofibular elastic fixation (group A), high fibular fracture without fixation + distal tibiofibular strong fixation (group B), high fibular fracture with 7-hole plate internal fixation + distal tibiofibular elastic fixation (group C), high fibular fracture with 7-hole plate internal fixation + distal tibiofibular strong fixation (group D), high fibular fracture with 5-hole plate internal fixation + distal tibiofibular elastic fixation (group E), and high fibular fracture with 5-hole plate internal fixation + distal tibiofibular strong fixation (group F). The finite element method was employed to simulate and analyze the different internal fixation models for the six groups, generating overall structural displacement and Von Mises stress distribution maps during slow walking and external rotation motions. RESULTS: Group A demonstrated the best ankle stability under slow walking and external rotation, with reduced tibial and fibular stress after fibular fracture fixation. Group D had the least displacement and most stability, while group A had the largest displacement and least stability. Overall, high fibular fracture fixation improved ankle stability. In slow walking, groups D and A had the least and greatest interosseous membrane stress. Comparing 5-hole plate (E/F) and 7-hole plate (C/D) fixation, no significant differences were found in ankle strength or displacement under slow walking or external rotation. CONCLUSION: Combining internal fixation for high fibular fractures with elastic fixation of the lower tibia and fibula is optimal for orthopedic treatment. It yields superior outcomes compared to no fibular fracture fixation or strong fixation of the lower tibia and fibula, especially during slow walking and external rotation. To minimize nerve damage, a smaller plate is recommended. This study strongly advocates for the clinical use of 5-hole plate internal fixation for high fibular fractures with elastic fixation of the lower tibia and fibula (group E).