Factors associated with physical activity of breast cancer patients participating in exercise intervention.

PURPOSE: Physical activity has been known to improve survival and quality of life of patients with breast cancer. To find factors associated with physical activity, we analyzed the dataset of the multicenter controlled trial of exercise intervention. METHODS: Three hundred fifty-six participants were assigned to two groups: "Smart After-Care" (smartphone application and pedometer were provided) or exercise education only. Physical activity was measured by International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) at baseline and after 12 weeks. The association between physical activity and other clinical characteristics was analyzed. RESULTS: At baseline, physical activity amount was 2315.5 ± 3513.2 MET min/week: 33.0% inactive, 49.6% minimally active, and 17.4% health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) active. Factors associated with HEPA include cancer stage and grip strength. A significantly lower proportion was HEPA active among those with advanced stage than among those with stage 0. After intervention, physical activity was increased to 3466.2 ± 4712.5 MET min/week: 15.3% inactive, 50.4% minimally active, and 34.2% HEPA active. Physical activity was increased in 63.4% of the participants. Factors associated with physical activity increase include cancer stage, diarrhea, and type of exercise intervention. Participants with advanced stage have a 3.3 times higher chance of increasing physical activity. Participants who received "Smart After-Care" have a 64% higher chance of increasing physical activity. CONCLUSION: Before the intervention, participants with advanced stage are less likely to be HEPA active. Exercise intervention was more beneficial for those with advanced stage or physical symptoms. "Smart After-Care" was more effective than education only in increasing physical activity.

Sarcoma of the breast: outcome and reconstructive options.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for all breast sarcomas. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy has not been clearly defined. The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to analyze prognostic factors, outcome, and recent advances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 203 patients with all breast sarcomas treated in a single center were collected from 1996 to 2010. Phyllodes tumors and metastatic disease at presentation were excluded from the population. Thirty-six women and 1 man were included in the analysis. Local recurrence, metastatic disease, survival, and reconstructive outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients out of 37 (91.9%) had an angiosarcoma and 3 had a stromal sarcoma (8.1%). Twenty-one patients (56.8%) had previously undergone breast radiation therapy for breast carcinoma or lymphoma. Twenty-six patients (70.3%) underwent mastectomy, 14 of whom (53.8%) with breast reconstruction. Thirty-six patients (97.3%) had free margins, 1 (2.7%) had a microscopically focally involved margin after surgery. Five patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and 6 received adjuvant radiation therapy. Median follow-up was 58 months (range, 4-146 months). Twelve sarcoma-related deaths were observed with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 43.4%. Twenty-four sarcoma-related events were observed with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 70.8%. The same figure was 49.7% in patients affected by primary sarcoma and 85.7% in patients with secondary sarcoma (P = .06). CONCLUSION: Secondary sarcomas were associated with a higher risk of events. Patients undergoing breast conservative surgery or reconstruction after mastectomy did not show a worse prognosis compared with patients undergoing mastectomy.