Implementation of an intravenous sotalol initiation protocol: Implications for feasibility, safety, and length of stay.

INTRODUCTION: Oral sotalol initiation requires a multiple-day, inpatient admission to monitor for QT prolongation during loading. A 1-day intravenous (IV) sotalol loading protocol was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in March 2020, but limited data on clinical use and administration currently exists. This study describes implementation of an IV sotalol protocol within an integrated health system, provides initial efficacy and safety outcomes, and examines length of stay (LOS) compared with oral sotalol initiation. METHODS: IV sotalol was administered according to a prespecified initiation protocol to adult patients with refractory atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. Baseline characteristics, safety and feasibility outcomes, and LOS were compared with patients receiving oral sotalol over a similar time period. RESULTS: From January 2021 to June 2022, a total of 29 patients (average age 66.0 ± 8.6 years, 27.6% women) underwent IV sotalol load and 20 patients (average age 60.4 ± 13.9 years, 65.0% women) underwent oral sotalol load. The load was successfully completed in 22/29 (75.9%) patients receiving IV sotalol and 20/20 (100%) of patients receiving oral sotalol, although 7/20 of the oral sotalol patients (35.0%) required dose reduction. Adverse events interrupting IV sotalol infusion included bradycardia (seven patients, 24.1%) and QT prolongation (three patients, 10.3%). No patients receiving IV or oral sotalol developed sustained ventricular arrhythmias before discharge. LOS for patients completing IV load was 2.6 days shorter (mean 1.0 vs. 3.6, p < .001) compared with LOS with oral load. CONCLUSION: IV sotalol loading has a safety profile that is similar to oral sotalol. It significantly shortens hospital LOS, potentially leading to large cost savings.

Sotalol in neonates for arrhythmias: Dosing, safety, and efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: Various agents may be utilized to manage supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in neonates and infants. Recently, sotalol has piqued interest given its reported success in managing neonates and infants with SVTs, especially with the intravenous formulation. While the manufacturer recommends using an age-related nomogram in neonates and young infants to guide doses, clinical reports describe various dosing based on weight (mg/kg) or on body surface area (BSA) in mg/m2 . Given the reported variation in clinical practice with regard to dosing in neonates, there is a gap in the literature and translation into clinical practice regarding applicability of the nomogram into clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to describe sotalol doses based on body weight and BSA in neonates for SVT. METHODS: This is a single center retrospective study evaluating effective sotalol dosing from January 2011 and June 2021 (inclusive). Neonates who received intravenous (IV) or oral (PO) sotalol for SVT were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was to describe sotalol doses based on body weight and BSA. Secondary outcomes include comparison of doses to the manufacturer nomogram, description of dose titrations, reported adverse outcomes, and change in therapy. Two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine statistically significant differences. RESULTS: Thirty-one eligible patients were included in this study. The median (range) age and weight were 16.5 (1-28) days and 3.2 (1.8-4.9) kg, respectively. The median initial dose was 7.3 (1.9-10.8) mg/kg or 114.3 (30.9-166.7) mg/m2 /day. Fourteen (45.2%) of patients required a dose increase for SVT control. The median dose required for rhythm control was 8.5 (2-14.8) mg/kg/day or 120.7 (30.9-225) mg/m2 /day. Of note, the median recommended dose per manufacturer nomogram for our patients would have been 51.3 (16.2-73.8) mg/m2 /day, which is significantly lower than both the initial dose (p < .001) and final doses (p < .001) utilized in our study. A total of 7 (22.9%) patients were uncontrolled on sotalol monotherapy using our dosing regimen. Two patients (6.5%) had reports of hypotension and one patient (3.3%) had a report of bradycardia requiring discontinuation of therapy. The average change in baseline QTC following sotalol initiation was 6.8%. Twenty-seven (87.1%), 3 (9.7%), 1 (3.3%) experienced prolongation, no change, or a decrease in QTc, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a sotalol strategy significantly higher than the manufacture dose recommendations are required for rhythm control in neonates with SVT. There were few adverse events reported with this dosing. Further prospective studies would be advantageous to confirm these findings.

The Arrhythmogenicity of Sotalol and its Role in Heart Failure: A Literature Review.

ABSTRACT: According to the American Heart Association, approximately 6 million adults have been afflicted with heart failure in the United States in 2020 and are more likely to have sudden cardiac death accounting for approximately 50% of the cause of mortality. Sotalol is a nonselective ß-adrenergic receptor antagonist with class III antiarrhythmic properties that has been mostly used for atrial fibrillation treatment and suppressing recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The use of sotalol in patients with left ventricular dysfunction is not recommended by the American College of Cardiology or American Heart Association because studies are inconclusive with conflicting results regarding safety. This article aims to review the mechanism of action of sotalol, the ß-blocking effects on heart failure, and provide an overview of clinical trials on sotalol use and its effects in patients with heart failure. Small- and large-scale clinical trials have been controversial and inconclusive about the use of sotalol in heart failure. Sotalol has been shown to reduce defibrillation energy requirements and reduce shocks from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Torsades de Pointes is the most life-threatening arrhythmia that has been documented with sotalol use and occurs more commonly in women and heart failure patients. Thus far, mortality benefits have not been demonstrated with sotalol use and larger multicenter studies are required going forward.

Economics and outcomes of sotalol in-patient dosing approaches in patients with atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: There exists variability in the administration of in-patient sotalol therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of this variability on patient in-hospital and 30-day posthospitalization costs and outcomes is not known. Also, the cost impact of intravenous sotalol, which can accelerate drug loading to therapeutic levels, is unknown. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-three AF patients admitted for oral sotalol initiation at an Intermountain Healthcare Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were included. Patient and dosing characteristics were described descriptively and the impact of dosing schedule was correlated with daily hospital costs/clinical outcomes during the index hospitalization and for 30 days. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement for 3-day sotalol initiation is $9263.51. Projections of cost savings were made considering a 1-day load using intravenous sotalol that costs $2500.00 to administer. RESULTS: The average age was 70.3 ± 12.3 years and 60.2% were male with comorbidities of hypertension (83%), diabetes (36%), and coronary artery disease (53%). The mean ejection fraction was 59.9 ± 7.8% and the median corrected QT interval was 453.7 ± 37.6 ms before sotalol dosing. No ventricular arrhythmias developed, but bradycardia (<60 bpm) was observed in 37.6% of patients. The average length of stay was 3.9 ± 4.6 (median: 2.2) days. Postdischarge outcomes and rehospitalization rates stratified by length of stay were similar. The cost per day was estimated at $2931.55 (1. $2931.55, 2. $5863.10, 3. $8794.65, 4. $11 726.20). CONCLUSIONS: In-patient oral sotalol dosing is markedly variable and results in the potential of both cost gain and loss to a hospital. In consideration of estimated costs, there is the potential for $871.55 cost savings compared to a 2-day oral load and $3803.10 compared to a 3-day oral load.

Influence of baseline QTc on sotalol-induced prolongation of ventricular repolarization in men and women.

The extent of sotalol-induced QTc prolongation on the electrocardiogram, is variable among subjects and influenced by sex. However, the influence of baseline QTc on the extent of drug-induced QTc prolongation remains unclear. This was studied around peak plasma concentration in a large cohort of 376 healthy male and 614 healthy female subjects who received 80 mg of sotalol orally. Baseline QTc was 379 ± 16 ms in men and 393 ± 15 ms in women (P < .0001). The change in QTc from baseline was highly variable among both sexes and was greater in women than in men (26.5 ± 13.2 vs.13.0 ± 10.8 ms; P < .0001). The slope of the regression line between QTc on sotalol and baseline QTc did not significantly differ from unity in men and in women, indicating that the extent of QTc prolongation with sotalol was not influenced by baseline QTc. Assessing QTc after administration of an IKr blocker may be more important than measuring a baseline QTc.

Effects of high glucose and insulin on the electrophysiological properties of cardiomyocytes derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells. / é«˜ç³–ä¸Žèƒ°å²›ç´ å¯¹äººè¯±å¯¼å¤šæ½œèƒ½å¹²ç»†èƒžæ¥æºçš„å¿ƒè‚Œç»†èƒžç”µç”Ÿç†ç‰¹æ€§çš„å½±å“.

OBJECTIVES: The risk of arrhythmia increases in diabetic patients. However, the effects of hyperglycemia and insulin therapy on the electrophysiological properties of human cardiomyocytes remain unclear. This study is to explore the effects of high glucose and insulin on the electrophysiological properties and arrhythmias of cardiomyocytes derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC-CMs). METHODS: Immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry were used to analyze the purity of hiPSC-CMs generated from human skin fibroblasts of a healthy donor. The hiPSC-CMs were divided into 3 group (treated with normal medium, high glucose and insulin for 4 days): a control group (NM group, containing 5 mmol/L glucose), a high glucose group (HG group, containing 15 mmol/L glucose), and a high glucose combined with insulin (HG+INS group, containing 15 mmol/L glucose+100 mg/L insulin). Electrophysiological changes of hiPSC-CMs were detected by microelectrode array (MEA) before or after treatment with glucose and insulin, including beating rate (BR), field potential duration (FPD) (similar to QT interval in ECG), FPDc (FPD corrected by BR), spike amplitude and conduction velocity (CV). Effects of sotalol on electrophysiological properties and arrhythmias of hiPSC-CMs were also evaluated. RESULTS: The expression of cardiac-specific marker of cardiac troponin T was high in the hiPSC-CMs. The purity of hiPSC-CMs was 99.06%. Compared with the NM group, BR was increased by (9.14±0.8)% in the HG group (P<0.01). After treatment with high glucose, FPD was prolonged from (460.4±9.0) ms to (587.6±23.7) ms in the HG group, while it was prolonged from (462.5±14.5) ms to (512.6±17.6) ms in the NM group. Compared with the NM group, FPD of hiPSC-CMs was prolonged by (16.8±1.4)% in the HG group (P<0.01). The FPDc of hiPSC-CMs was prolonged from (389.1±13.7) ms to (478.3±31.5) ms in the HG group, and that was prolonged from (387.7±21.6) ms to (422.6±32.9) ms in the NM group. Compared with the NM group, the FPDc of hiPSC-CMs was prolonged by (13.9±1.3)% in HG group (P<0.01). The spike amplitude and CV remained unchanged between the HG group and the NM group (P>0.05). Ten µmol/L of sotalol can induce significant arrhythmias from all wells in the HG group. After treatment with insulin and high glucose, compared with the HG group, BR was increased by (8.3±0.5)% in the HG+INS group (P<0.05). The FPD was prolonged from (463.4±9.7) ms to (532.6±12.8) ms in the HG+INS group, while it was prolonged from (460.4±9.0) ms to (587.6±23.7) ms in the HG group. Compared with the HG group, the FPD of hiPSC-CMs was shortened by (12.7±1.9)% in the HG+INS group (P<0.01). The FPDc of hiPSC-CMs was prolonged from (387.4±4.1) ms to (422.4±10.0) ms in the HG+INS group, and that was prolonged from (384.8±4.0) ms to (476.3±11.5) ms in HG group. Compared with the HG group, the FPDc of hiPSC-CMs was shortened by (14.7±1.1)% in HG group (P<0.01). After the insulin treatment, the spike amplitude of hiPSC-CMs was increased from (3.12±0.46) mV to (4.35±0.64) mV in the HG+INS group, while it was enhanced from (3.06±0.35) mV to (3.33±0.41) mV in the HG group. The spike amplitude of hiPSC-CMs was increased by (30.8±3.7)% in the HG+INS group compared with that in the HG group (P<0.05). The CV in the HG+INS group was increased from (0.23±0.08) mm/ms to (0.32±0.08) mm/ms after insulin treatment, which was increased from (0.21±0.04) mm/ms to (0.30±0.07) mm/ms in the HG group, but there was no significant difference in CV between the HG+INS group and the HG group (P>0.05). The induction experiment showed that 10 µmol/L of sotalol could prolong the FPDc of hiPSC-CMs by (78.9±11.6)% in the HG+INS group, but no arrhythmia was induced in each well. CONCLUSIONS: High glucose can induce FPD/FPDc of hiPSC-CMs prolongation and increase the risk of arrhythmia induced by drugs. Insulin can reduce the FPD/FPDc prolongation and the risk of induced arrhythmia by high glucose.These results are important to understand the electrophysiological changes of the myocardium in diabetic patients and the impact of insulin therapy on its electrophysiology. Further study on the mechanism may provide new ideas and methods for the treatment of acquired and even inherited long QT syndrome.

"Second line medications" for supraventricular arrhythmias in children: In-hospital efficacy and adverse events during treatment initiation of sotalol and flecainide.

INTRODUCTION: Sotalol and flecainide are used as second line agents in children for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias (SA) refractory to anti-beta adrenergic antiarrhythmics or digoxin. Efficacy and adverse events in this cohort have not been well described. Here, we report our institutional experience of second line treatment initiation for SA in children. METHODS AND RESULTS: Utilizing an institutional database, 247 patients initiated on sotalol and 81 patients initiated on flecainide were identified. Congenital heart disease (CHD) was present in 40% of patients. Arrhythmia-free discharge on single or dual agent therapy (in combination with other antiarrhythmics) was 87% for sotalol and 91% for flecainide. Neither age, sex, dosing, presence of CHD nor arrhythmia subtype were associated with alterations in in-hospital efficacy. Compared to baseline, QTc intervals in sotalol patients (436 [416-452 ms] vs. 415 [400-431 ms], p < .01) and QRS intervals in flecainide patients (75 [68-88 ms] vs. 62 [56-71 ms], p < .01) were prolonged. Dose reduction or discontinuation due to QRS prolongation occurred in 9% of patients on flecainide. QTc prolongation resulting in dose reduction/discontinuation of sotalol was encountered in 9 patients (4%) and death with documented torsade de pointes in 2 patients (1%), with 9 of 11 patients having underlying CHD. CONCLUSION: In children requiring second line agents for treatment of SA, both sotalol and flecainide appear to be highly efficacious. Although predominantly safe in otherwise healthy patients, electrocardiogram changes can occur and children with underlying cardiac disease may have an increased risk of adverse events and rhythm-related side effects during initiation.

Does Sotalol Still Have a Role in the Management of Arrhythmias?

Despite proven effectiveness in treating tachyarrhythmias, sotalol is proarrhythmic and can cause torsades de pointes. Given the emergence of studies that show no benefit from rhythm control strategies in managing atrial fibrillation, as well as the introduction of nonpharmacological approaches to treating arrhythmias, we felt it necessary to ascertain if there was any role for sotalol given its side effects. Review of the literature regarding sotalol use in the prevention and treatment of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias seems to show that more effective and safer agents and nonpharmacological alternatives are currently available. However, sotalol still seems to be useful in preventing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias postcardiac surgery and in reverting hemodynamically stable sustained ventricular tachycardias in the setting of coronary artery disease. Its role in the prevention of tachyarrhythmias in the setting of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy requires further investigation.

Pharmacological ß-adrenoceptor blockade can augment torsadogenic action of IKr inhibitor: Comparison of proarrhythmic effects of d-sotalol and dl-sotalol in the chronic atrioventricular block dogs.

Information is still limited whether ß-blockade may augment or attenuate the onset of torsade de pointes in patients with IKr inhibitor-induced labile repolarization process. We compared the proarrhythmic effects of d-sotalol with those of dl-sotalol using the chronic atrioventricular block dogs, since d- and l-isomers share a similar blocking action on IKr but ß-blocking activity resides only in l-isomer. dl-Sotalol (3 mg/kg, p.o.) induced torsade de pointes in 3 out of 4 animals, whereas d-sotalol (3 mg/kg, p.o.) induced it in only 1 out of 4 animals. Thus, ß-blockade can augment torsadogenic action of IKr inhibitor.

[Torsade de pointe resulting from a drug interaction between sotalol and ciprofloxacin]. / Torsade de pointe sur interaction médicamenteuse entre sotalol et ciprofloxacine.

Sotalol is a bêta-blocker and class 3 anti-arrhythmic. Ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibiotic used against Gram - germs. Both drugs have a common adverse effect : they increase QT interval with a risk of torsade de pointe. The risk increases even more if other risk factors are present such as old age, female gender, renal failure, high blood pressure and ionic disturbances. Because a long QT interval is not associated with symptoms, only an electrocardiogram can establish the diagnosis. However, it's not rare that a torsade de pointe will reveal it. We report a clinical case of a long QT interval due to the association of sotalol and ciprofloxacin, which led to a torsade de pointe. Intravenous magnesium sulphate is the recommended treatment if haemodynamic parameters are good. If not, an external electric shock may be needed.

Le sotalol est un bêta-bloquant utilisé principalement comme anti-arythmique de classe 3. La ciprofloxacine est un antibiotique de la classe des fluoroquinolones, actif sur les germes Gram négatif. Ces deux médicaments présentent, comme effet secondaire commun, le fait d'augmenter l'espace QT avec un risque de torsade de pointe. Si on y ajoute les autres facteurs de risque d'un allongement de QT que sont notamment l'âge, le sexe féminin, l'insuffisance rénale, l'hypertension artérielle et les troubles ioniques, le risque de torsade de pointe est encore majoré. Comme un QT long ne s'accompagne pas de symptômes, seul l'électrocardiogramme permet d'établir le diagnostic. Il n'est néanmoins pas rare qu'une torsade de pointe le révèle. Nous rapportons ici un cas dont le QT long engendré par une association sotalol-ciprofloxacine s'est manifesté par une torsade de pointe chez une patiente âgée avec insuffisance rénale. Le traitement est le sulfate de magnésium par voie intraveineuse si les paramètres hémodynamiques restent bons. S'ils viennent à se dégrader, un choc électrique externe peut s'avérer nécessaire.

Ventricular arrhythmia and death among atrial fibrillation patients using anti-arrhythmic drugs.

AIM: The aim of the study was to assess and compare the safety of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in an unselected real-world population of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a study of all patients with diagnosed AF in the Swedish Patient register who filled a prescription for sotalol, amiodarone, dronedarone, flecainide or disopyramide during 2010 to 2015. The main end point consisted of arrhythmic death, successful resuscitation, new diagnosis of sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or implantation of ICD. All-cause mortality was a secondary end point. Minimum follow up was 1 year. Falsification end points were used to assess hidden confounding. 44,995 AF patients on AAD and 267,518 AF patients without AAD were studied during a total time at risk of over 1.1 million years. Compared to sotalol, the risk for the main end point was decreased with dronedarone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.90), similar with flecainide (HR 0.95, 0.69-1.32) and disopyramide (HR 1.30, CI 0.83-2.05). All-cause mortality was lower with dronedarone (HR 0.44, CI 0.34-0.57) and flecainide (HR 0.55, CI 0.44-0.68) than with sotalol. Hidden confounding prevented reliable assessment of amiodarone. CONCLUSIONS: Dronedarone was the only anti-arrhythmic drug with significantly lower risk for arrhythmic death, sustained ventricular arrhythmia or ICD implantation than sotalol among patients with atrial fibrillation. Both dronedarone and flecainide were associated with lower all-cause mortality than sotalol.

Psychotropic Pharmacotherapy Associated With QT Prolongation Among Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the Food and Drug Administration issued Drug Safety Communications on several drugs associated with QT prolongation and fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Among these was citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) approved for depression and commonly used for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Evaluation of the risk for QT prolongation among other psychotropic drugs for individuals with PTSD remains limited. OBJECTIVE: Explore psychotropic drugs associated with QT prolongation among veterans with PTSD. METHODS: Patients in the Veterans Health Administration in 2006-2009 with PTSD and QT prolongation (176 cases) were matched 1:4 on age, gender, visit date and setting, and physical comorbidity. Classification trees assessed QT prolongation risk among prescribed medications (n=880). RESULTS: Receipt of any drug with known risk of QT prolongation varied by group (23% QT cases vs 15% control, p<0.01). Psychotropic medications conferring significant risks included ziprasidone (3% vs 1%, p=0.02) and buspirone (6% vs 2%, p=0.01). Increased risk was not observed for the SSRIs, citalopram and fluoxetine. Classification trees found that sotalol and amitriptyline carried greater risk among cardiac patients and methadone, especially if prescribed with quetiapine, among noncardiac patients. Per adjusted survival model, patients with QT prolongation were at increased risk for death (hazard ratio=1.60; 95% CI=1.04-2.44). CONCLUSIONS: Decision models are particularly advantageous when exploring nonlinear relationships or nonadditive interactions. These findings may potentially affect clinical decision-making concerning treatment for PTSD. For patients at higher risk of QT prolongation, antidepressants other than amitriptyline should be considered. Medications for comorbid conditions should also be closely monitored for heightened QT prolongation risk.

Intravenous Sotalol: An Under Used Treatment Strategy.

The pharmacologic treatment of arrhythmias has seen little advance over the past few years. Physicians treating life threatening or hemodynamically destabilizing arrhythmias depend almost entirely on intravenous (IV) amiodarone. This is regrettable due to the multiple toxicities of amiodarone and its long half-life. Once administered, it is a therapeutic commitment to long-term therapy. Given the very long terminal elimination half-life, treatment with amiodarone may interfere with baseline electrophysiologic studies and ablation procedures. Additionally, the side effect profile can be consequential, even with brief periods of treatment. Currently, sotalol, like amiodarone, is available in both IV and oral formulations, facilitating their use in emergency situations. IV sotalol has a rapid onset of action with linear pharmacokinetics. While sotalol's efficacy has mostly been evaluated in small clinical trials, 2 recent meta-analysis have been informative as to the utility of sotalol. Sotalol has similar efficacy as amiodarone, but has much more favorable adverse event profile. IV sotalol has been underutilized and could offer advantage in the treatment of AF for rate and rhythm control, as well in the pediatrics for treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias often resistant to other therapies.

Pediatric Dosing of Intravenous Sotalol Based on Body Surface Area in Patients with Arrhythmia.

In a recently published study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous sotalol in pediatric patients with incessant tachyarrhythmias and we have found that intravenous sotalol is effective and safe. Our dosing regimen was based on the body weight of the patients. In the US, the recommendation for intravenous sotalol dosing in pediatric patients is based on body surface area (BSA) while taking into consideration the patients' age. The purpose of this paper is to show the correspondence of a body weight-based dosing regimen when expressed for BSA as mg/m2. We evaluated the similarity of a body weight-based dose to that calculated based on BSA using the US labeling recommendations. Of the 83 patients, 5 were newborns (age: 0-30 days), 39 infants and toddlers (age: 1-24 month), 26 young children (age: >2-6 years), 11 older children (age: 6-12 years), and 2 adolescents (age: 14 years). Each received a loading dose of 1 mg/kg intravenous sotalol administered over 10 min followed by a maintenance dose of 4.5 mg/kg/day. There was a close correlation between the sotalol loading doses calculated based on body weight and BSA across the entire age range (r = 0.977, p < 0.001). In most of the age groups, the body weight-based loading doses were lower or equal to the BSA-based doses. Only in the adolescents were the body weight-based doses higher. The maintenance doses given in our study were significantly higher than the BSA-based dose in newborns: 75 ± 6 versus 53 ± 8 mg/m2, p < 0.05; infants/toddlers: 88 ± 14 versus 77 ± 7 mg/m2, p < 0.001; younger children: 113 ± 12 versus 85 mg/m2, p < 0.001; older children: 123 ± 16 versus 85 mg/m2, p < 0.01; and adolescents 157 ± 30 versus 85.5 mg/m2. Despite the rapid administration of the loading dose and the increased maintenance doses, our body weight-based dosing regimen was safe. Only one newborn had significant adverse event (AV block) that resolved spontaneously after discontinuation of the infusion.

Electrocardiographic Predictors of Torsadogenic Risk During Dofetilide or Sotalol Initiation: Utility of a Novel T Wave Analysis Program.

INTRODUCTION: Initiation of class III anti-arrhythmic medications requires telemetric monitoring for ventricular arrhythmias and QT prolongation to reduce the risk of torsades de pointes (TdP). Heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) is an indicator of risk, however it is imperfect, and subtle abnormalities of repolarization have been linked with arrhythmogenesis. PURPOSE: Identification of electrocardiographic predictors of torsadogenic risk through the application of a novel T wave analysis tool. METHODS: Among all patients admitted to Mayo Clinic for initiation of dofetilide or sotalol, we identified 13 cases who developed drug-induced TdP and 26 age and sex matched controls that did not develop TdP. The immediate pre-TdP ECG of those with TdP was compared to the last ECG performed prior to hospital discharge in controls using a novel T wave program that quantified subtle changes in T wave morphology. RESULTS: The QTc and 12 T wave parameters successfully distinguished TdP cases from controls. The top performing parameters were the QTc in lead V3 (mean case vs control 480 vs 420 msec, p < 0.001, r = 0.72) and T wave right slope in lead I (mean case vs control -840.29 vs -1668.71 mV/s, p = 0.002, r = 0.45). The addition of T wave right slope to QTc improved prediction accuracy from 79 to 88 %. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that, in addition to QTc, the T wave right slope is correlated strongly with TdP risk. This suggests that a computer-based repolarization measurement tool that integrates additional data beyond the QTc may identify patients with the greatest torsadogenic potential.

Risk prediction for adverse events during initiation of sotalol and dofetilide for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient antiarrhythmic drug initiation for atrial fibrillation is mandated for dofetilide (DF) and is often performed for sotalol (SL), particularly if proarrhythmia risk factors are present. Whether low-risk patients can be identified to safely allow outpatient initiation is unknown. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed on patients initiated with DF or SL. Risk factors for adverse events (AEs), defined as any arrhythmia or electrocardiogram change requiring dose reduction or cessation, were identified. RESULTS: Of 329 patients, 227 (69%) received SL and 102 (31%) DF. The cohort had a mean age of 63 ± 13 years; 70% of patients were male and had a baseline QTc of 440 ± 37 ms. A total of 105 AEs occurred in 92 patients: QTc prolongation or ventricular tachyarrhythmia in 70 patients (67% of AEs), bradyarrhythmias in 35 patients (33% of AEs), with some experiencing both AE types. Ventricular arrhythmias were seen in 23 patients (7%) and torsades de pointes in one (0.3%). Total AE rates were similar between drugs (P = 0.09); however, DF patients had more QTc prolongation or ventricular arrhythmias (P = 0.001). In SL patients, there were no predictors for QTc prolongation or ventricular proarrhythmia. In DF patients, higher baseline QTc interval (odds ratio = 1.64/25 ms, P = 0.01) was an independent predictor of QTc prolongation or ventricular proarrhythmias. For patients without proarrhythmia risk factors, overall AE rate was 26%. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, AEs are common during DF and SL initiation but rarely severe in hospitalized inpatients. Baseline QTc predicts AEs for DF patients only and AE are common even in "low-risk" patients. These results support in-hospital drug initiation for all DF and SL patients.

ECG-based estimation of dispersion of APD restitution as a tool to stratify sotalol-induced arrhythmic risk.

BACKGROUND: Increased spatial dispersion of restitution properties has been associated to arrhythmic risk. An ECG-based index quantifying restitution dispersion, DRest, is evaluated in patients who experienced Torsades de Pointes (TdP) under sotalol challenge and compared with the response in healthy subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: ECG recordings were analyzed for quantification of DRest and QTc, among others biomarkers. DRest provides improved discrimination following sotalol administration between TdP and healthy subjects ([min-max]: [0.18-0.22] vs [0.02-0.12]), compared to other biomarkers including QTc ([436-548ms] vs [376-467ms]). Results in healthy subjects are in agreement with simulations of sotalol effects on a human tissue electrophysiological model. CONCLUSIONS: This case study supports the potential of DRest for improved arrhythmia risk stratification even with QTc values below 450ms.

Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) as a Bridge to Recovery for Tachycardia-Mediated Cardiomyopathy.

A case is described of cardiogenic shock that occurred following use of sotalol in a patient with severe left ventricular dysfunction. The patient required left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement with subsequent myocardial recovery to a degree that allowed eventual device removal following 140 days of support.

In silico screening of the impact of hERG channel kinetic abnormalities on channel block and susceptibility to acquired long QT syndrome.

Accurate diagnosis of predisposition to long QT syndrome is crucial for reducing the risk of cardiac arrhythmias. In recent years, drug-induced provocative tests have proved useful to unmask some latent mutations linked to cardiac arrhythmias. In this study we expanded this concept by developing a prototype for a computational provocative screening test to reveal genetic predisposition to acquired long-QT syndrome (aLQTS). We developed a computational approach to reveal the pharmacological properties of IKr blocking drugs that are most likely to cause aLQTS in the setting of subtle alterations in IKr channel gating that would be expected to result from benign genetic variants. We used the model to predict the most potentially lethal combinations of kinetic anomalies and drug properties. In doing so, we also implicitly predicted ideal inverse therapeutic properties of K channel openers that would be expected to remedy a specific defect. We systematically performed "in silico mutagenesis" by altering discrete kinetic transition rates of the Fink et al. Markov model of human IKr channels, corresponding to activation, inactivation, deactivation and recovery from inactivation of IKr channels. We then screened and identified the properties of IKr blockers that caused acquired long QT and therefore unmasked mutant phenotypes for mild, moderate and severe variants. Mutant IKr channels were incorporated into the O'Hara et al. human ventricular action potential (AP) model and subjected to simulated application of a wide variety of IKr-drug interactions in order to identify the characteristics that selectively exacerbate the AP duration (APD) differences between wild-type and IKr mutated cells. Our results show that drugs with disparate affinities to conformation states of the IKr channel are key to amplify variants underlying susceptibility to acquired long QT syndrome, an effect that is especially pronounced at slow frequencies. Finally, we developed a mathematical formulation of the M54T MiRP1 latent mutation and simulated a provocative test. In this setting, application of dofetilide dramatically amplified the predicted QT interval duration in the M54T hMiRP1 mutation compared to wild-type.