Challenging Dogma by Skipping the Emergency Department Thoracotomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Database.

INTRODUCTION: Survival following emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) for patients in extremis is poor. Whether intervention in the operating room instead of EDT in select patients could lead to improved outcomes is unknown. We hypothesized that patients who underwent intervention in the operating room would have improved outcomes compared to those who underwent EDT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2017 to 2021. All adult patients who underwent EDT, operating room thoracotomy (ORT), or sternotomy as the first form of surgical intervention within 1 h of arrival were included. Of patients without prehospital cardiac arrest, propensity score matching was utilized to create three comparable groups. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included time to procedure. RESULTS: There were 1865 EDT patients, 835 ORT patients, and 456 sternotomy patients who met the inclusion criteria. There were 349 EDT, 344 ORT, and 408 sternotomy patients in the matched analysis. On Cox multivariate regression, there was an increased risk of mortality with EDT versus sternotomy (HR 4.64, P < 0.0001), EDT versus ORT (HR 1.65, P < 0.0001), and ORT versus sternotomy (HR 2.81, P < 0.0001). Time to procedure was shorter with EDT versus sternotomy (22 min versus 34 min, P < 0.0001) and versus ORT (22 min versus 37 min, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There was an association between sternotomy and ORT versus EDT and improved mortality. In select patients, operative approaches rather than the traditional EDT could be considered.

Outcomes after Contralateral Anatomic Surgical Resection in Multiple Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated surgically for lung cancer may present synchronous or metachronous lung cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes after a second contralateral anatomic surgical resection for lung cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective two-center study, based on a prospective indexed database. Included patients were treated surgically by bilateral anatomic surgical resection for a second primary lung cancer. We excluded nonanatomic resections, benign lesions, and ipsilateral second surgical resections. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and September 2018, 55 patients underwent contralateral anatomic surgical resections for lung cancer, mostly for metachronous cancers. The first surgical resection was a lobectomy in most cases (45 lobectomies: 81.8%, 9 segmentectomies: 16.4%, and 1 bilobectomy: 1.8%), and a video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedure was used in 23 cases (41.8%). The mean interval between the operations was 38 months, and lobectomy was less frequent for the second surgical resection (35 lobectomies: 63.6% and 20 segmentectomies: 36.4%), with VATS procedures performed in 41 cases (74.5%). Ninety-day mortality was 10.9% (n = 6), and 3-year survival was 77%. Risk factor analysis identified the number of resected segments during the second intervention or the total number of resected segments, extent of resection (lobectomy vs. segmentectomy), surgical approach (thoracotomy vs. VATS), tumor stage, and nodal involvement as potential prognostic factors for long-term survival. CONCLUSION: A second contralateral anatomic surgical resection for multiple primary lung cancer is possible, with a higher early mortality rate, but acceptable long-term survival, and should be indicated for carefully selected patients.

Minithoracotomy and Beating Heart Strategy for Mitral Surgery in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: In patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) associated with low ejection fraction or previous heart surgery, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamp (MIMVS-WAC) has shown promising results. We report our experience for this strategy in our centers. METHODS: Between August 2011 and April 2017, 46 patients (mean age 69 ± 11 years, 76% males) received MIMVS-WAC. Indications for this technique were prior coronary bypass surgery (26%), severe or recent left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (30%), or both (39%). The mean EuroSCORE II was 12 ± 10. RESULTS: For each procedure, we conducted right minithoracotomy and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) after peripheral cannulation. Mean CPB time was 159 ± 39 minutes. A mitral valve replacement (MVR) was performed in 23 cases (50%), an annuloplasty in 22 cases (48%), and a prosthesis pannus removal in 1 case (2%). Mean hospital length of stay was 12 ± 5.4 days. We report no sternotomy conversions, six reoperations for bleeding, and three deaths at 30 days. Transfusion was requested in 62% (mean infusion 2 ± 2.4 packed red blood cells). The postoperative echocardiography showed an LV function preservation in 69% of cases and a reduction of pulmonary arterial pressure in 73% of cases. Four additional deaths occurred in the long-term follow-up (mean 637 ± 381 days, median 593 days). No mitral reoperation was required, with a MR ≤ 2 in 90% of patients. CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients, the MIMVS-WAC is a safe technique. It avoids hard dissections while ensuring excellent preservation of cardiac function.

Operative invasiveness does not affect the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between operative invasiveness and the prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have undergone surgery has been controversial. METHODS: Clinical data were analyzed for 463 NSCLC patients. Operative invasiveness was defined by wound length, operation time, and the postoperative C-reactive protein (postCRP) level. The operative approach was divided into video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy. RESULTS: The wound length and operation time were significantly correlated with the postCRP level (correlation coefficient (CC) = 0.39, p <  0.01; CC = 0.54, p <  0.01, respectively). The postCRP level in the VATS group was significantly lower than that in the thoracotomy group (12.2 mg/dl vs 20.58 mg/dl, p <  0.01). The relapse-free survival differed significantly based on wound length (p <  0.01), operation time (p = 0.01), CRP level (p <  0.01), and operative approach (p <  0.01). The carcinoembryonic antigen level (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; p = 0.02), pathological stage (pStage) (HR, 2.57; p <  0.01), vascular invasion (HR, 1.95; p = 0.01), and preoperative CRP level (preCRP) (HR, 1.91; p <  0.01) were identified as significant prognostic factors for relapse-free survival in a multivariate analysis. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis showed that smoking history (HR, 2.36; p = 0.03), pStage (HR, 3.26; p <  0.01), and preCRP level were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CRP level was associated with poor prognosis. Although the VATS approach might be less invasive procedure for NSCLC patients, operative invasiveness does not affect the prognosis.

Clinical analysis of early death in children with pleuropulmonary blastoma in a single center in China.

OBJECTIVE: Pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) is a rare malignant tumor in childhood that is highly invasive and has poor prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed patients with PPB who died within 30 days in hopes of providing a basis for improving diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed six children with PPB who died within 30 days of admission at our hospital from January 2004 to March 2018, including their clinical features, pathological diagnosis, course of treatment, and major causes of death. RESULTS: Six patients (two female, four male; median age, 38 months) were included. All patients presented with respiratory symptoms. Chest imaging showed that all tumors had diameters greater than 10 cm, with varying degrees of serous effusion. Four patients underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), one patient underwent exploratory thoracotomy, and one underwent partial tumor resection. Five cases were type III, and another was type II. Four patients developed adverse events while waiting for pathological results after FNA, and four patients were treated with chemotherapy but their tumors failed to decrease in size one to two weeks later. The median hospitalization to death time was 17 days (range, 5-24 days). CONCLUSIONS: PPB often presents with respiratory symptoms that rapidly develop into respiratory distress. The rapid tumor enlargement contributes to the disease's progression. Chemoreduction in such tumors is not obviously effective, and the mortality rate is high. The main causes of death were respiratory failure and sepsis. Further clinical studies will be required to evaluate the role of initial biopsy compared with upfront total excision.

Which Patients Are Candidates for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?　- Establishment of Risk Calculators Using National Clinical Database.

BACKGROUND: Although minimally invasive mitral valve surgery via a right minithoracotomy (MICS-mitral) is widely performed, no tool to evaluate its risk has been reported. We sought to establish MICS-mitral risk calculators using a national clinical database for selection of appropriate patients.Methods and Results:Between 2008 and 2015, 3,240 patients (mean age 59±14 years, males 1,950) underwent a MICS-mitral procedure in Japan and were registered in a national clinical database. We examined mortality and composite outcome (operative mortality, stroke, reoperation for bleeding) using multivariate analysis, then developed a risk calculator for each using stepwise analysis. Operative mortality was 1.1% and the composite outcome rate was 5%. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for operative mortality were shown to be age, respiratory dysfunction, thoracic aortic disease, myocardial infarction, body mass index >30, NYHA class IV, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, mitral valve replacement, multiple valve surgery, and annual cases <10. ROC curve analysis of our prediction formulas for mortality and composite outcome revealed an area under the curve for operative mortality of 0.877 (95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.94, P<0.01) and for composite outcome of 0.665 (95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.71, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We developed risk calculator formulas using risk factors associated with both operative mortality and composite outcome. The present risk calculator formula is useful for patient selection and may influence future applications for this procedure.

Minimally Invasive versus Conventional LVAD-Implantation-An Analysis of the Literature.

This review aims to provide an overview on recent data to evaluate minimally invasive (MVAD) and conventional (CVAD) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted up to April 2017. A total of 183 studies were identified; 13 studies met inclusion criteria. The review revealed a trend toward a lower rate of transfusion, and shorter time for cardiopulmonary bypass, as well as a lower 30-day mortality rate for MVAD. This review indicates that there are possible benefits of minimally invasive LVAD implantation, even though the state of literature is poor.

Analysis of Minimally Invasive Left Thoracotomy HVAD Implantation - A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation may reduce peri-/postoperative complications and risks associated with resternotomies. In this study, we describe our first results using a minimally invasive LVAD implantation technique (lateral thoracotomy [LT] group). These results were compared with LVAD implantations done via full median sternotomy (STX group). METHODS: HVAD (HeartWare, Framingham, Massachusetts, United States) implantations in 70 patients (LT group n = 22, 52 ± 15 years old; STX group n = 48, 59 ± 11 years old) were retrospectively analyzed. Minimally invasive access via left thoracotomy was feasible in 22 patients. Peri- and postoperative analyses of survival and adverse events were performed. RESULTS: No survival differences were observed between the LT and STX group (p = 0.43). LT patients without temporary right ventricular assist device (tRVAD) showed a significantly better survival rate compared to LT patients with concomitant tRVAD implantation (p = 0.02), which could not be demonstrated in the STX group (p = 0.11). Two LT and four STX patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation and three STX patients were successfully weaned with subsequent LVAD explantations. LVAD-related infections (n = 4 LT group vs n = 20 STX group, p = 0.04) were less likely in the LT group. No wound dehiscence occurred in the LT group, whereas five were observed in the STX group (p = 0.17). The amount of perioperative blood transfusions (within the first 7 postoperative days) did not differ in both study groups (p = 0.48). CONCLUSION: The minimally invasive approach is a viable alternative with the possibility to reduce complications and should be particularly considered for bridge-to-transplant patients.

Mitral Valve Surgery via Partial Upper Sternotomy: Closing the Gap between Conventional Sternotomy and Right Lateral Minithoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: Minithoracotomy (MT) has gained broad acceptance for mitral valve surgery (MVS) in the last decade. In the presence of defined limitations of MT, however, full sternotomy (FS) is still widely preferred. We assume that the less investigated partial upper sternotomy (PS) will permit the gap between MT and FS in MVS to be closed. The purpose of this study is to investigate a valid less invasive alternative to MT for isolated MVS or multivalve surgery. METHODS: This retrospective analysis includes data on 1,639 patients, who underwent either isolated or combined primary MVS at our department from May 2011 to August 2017. Out of these, 663 patients were operated via MT access. One-hundred three patients had been judged as not suitable for MT but feasible for PS approach in which 53.4% (n = 55) had isolated MVS and 46.6% patients (n = 48) underwent multivalve surgery. Concomitant myocardial revascularization was performed in 2.9% of the study patients (n = 3). RESULTS: Operative, 90-day, and 1-year mortality in the PS-cohort was 0, 1.0% (n = 1), and 3.3% (n = 3), respectively. During a median follow-up time of 1,115 days (interquartile range 398-1806), all-cause mortality was 5.8% (n = 6). Operative times for cardiopulmonary-bypass and cross-clamping were 167 minutes (140-198) and 107 minutes (93-132), respectively. Median length of stay at the intensive care unit and hospital was 1 (1-2) and 7 days (7-10), respectively. CONCLUSION: The presented results demonstrate that there is a cohort of patients, who are not candidates for MT in MVS but may be operated successfully by an alternative less invasive approach.

Long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy vs. thoracotomy lobectomy for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is performed widely for patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) because of its superior short-term outcomes to those of thoracotomy lobectomy. However, the long-term outcomes of VATS lobectomy vs. thoracotomy lobectomy remain controversial. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of 202 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy for clinical stage IA NSCLC at our institution between January, 2008 and December, 2013. Stage IA NSCLC was confirmed pathologically in 162 of these patients, 60 of whom underwent VATS lobectomy and 102 of whom underwent thoracotomy lobectomy. We compared the perioperative clinical factors and outcomes of these two groups, using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: In an analysis of 58 matched cases, the VATS group showed less blood loss, a shorter duration of chest tube placement, a shorter postoperative hospital stay, and a lower peak C-reactive protein value, despite a longer operative time. The VATS group also had significantly longer survival than the thoracotomy group [5-year overall survival, 100% vs. 87%, respectively (p = 0.01); 5-year disease-free survival, 100% vs. 86% (p = 0.03)]. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that VATS may have better long-term as well as short-term outcomes than thoracotomy for patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Right Place at the Right Time: Thoracotomies at Level I Trauma Centers Have Associated Improved Survival.

BACKGROUND: Early thoracotomy (ET) is a procedure performed on patients in extremis. Identifying factors associated with ET survival may allow for optimization of guidelines and improved patient selection. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess whether ETs performed at Level I trauma centers (TC) are associated with improved survival. METHODS: This was a retrospective study utilizing the National Trauma Databank 2014-2015. We included all thoracotomies performed within 1 h of hospital arrival. Patients were stratified according to TC designation level. Patient demographics, outcomes, and center characteristics were compared. We conducted multivariable regression with survival as the outcome. RESULTS: There were 3183 ETs included in this study; 2131 (66.9%) were performed at Level I TCs. Patients treated at Level I and non-Level I TCs had similar median injury severity scores, as well as signs of life and systolic blood pressures on admission. Patients treated at Level I TCs had significantly higher survival rates (21.6% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001), with 40% greater odds of survival after controlling for injury-specific factors and emergency medical services transportation time (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.89, p = 0.03). Penetrating injuries had 23.1% survival after ET vs. 12.9% for blunt injuries (adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.37-2.53, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ETs performed at Level I TCs were associated with 40% greater odds of survival compared with ETs at non-Level I TCs. This demonstrates that factors extrinsic to the patient may play a role in survival of severely injured patients.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery for Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of minimally invasive mitral valve (MV) surgery in infective endocarditis (IE) has not been reported in detail. We assessed the safety, efficacy, and durability of the minimally invasive approach through a right anterolateral minithoracotomy for surgical treatment of MV IE. METHODS: A review of the Leipzig Heart Center database revealed 92 eligible patients operated on between 2002 and 2013. All patients had undergone minimally invasive surgery for IE. The indication for surgery was isolated IE of the MV in all patients. Baseline and intraoperative data, as well as clinical outcomes and short-term follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 60.9 ± 15.3 years, the logistic EuroSCORE II was 19.6 ± 19.1%, and 64.1% (59) were male. MV repair was feasible in 23.9% (22/92) of patients. Repair techniques included annuloplasty ring implantation, anterior mitral leaflet resection, posterior mitral leaflet resection, and implantation of neochordae. MV replacement was performed in 69 patients (75%), a mitral annulus patch in 1 patient, and concomitant tricuspid valve surgery for tricuspid regurgitation in 5 patients. Bacteriological analysis showed staphylococcus infection in 45.5%, streptococcus in 36.4%, enterococcus in 13.6%, and others in 4.5%. The 30-day-mortality rate was 9.8% (9 patients). The 1-year follow-up showed a 1-year survival rate of 77.7 ± 4.4% and freedom from reoperation within 1 year due to reendocarditis of 93.3 ± 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive approach is suitable for the treatment of IE of the MV. It is a good technique in IE in selected patients.

Clinical Outcome of Urgent Thoracotomy in Patients with Penetrating and Blunt Chest Trauma: A Retrospective Survey.

INTRODUCTION: In contrast to an emergency department of thoracotomy (EDT), an urgent thoracotomy (UT) is defined as a surgical thoracic intervention performed in the operating room within the first 48 hours of the patient's intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The factors affecting survival after UT are not fully understood. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and outcome of patients with blunt and penetrating chest injuries who underwent UT. METHODS: All adult patients who had blunt or penetrating chest trauma and who underwent UT, were included in the study. All data were collected from the patients' hospital and ICU records. Forty-five patients with thoracic injuries who underwent UT during the first 48 hours of ICU stay were analyzed. Of these, 25 had penetrating chest injuries, and 20 had blunt thoracic injuries. Of the penetrating injuries, 16 were stab wounds, and 9 were gunshot wounds. RESULTS: Overall ICU mortality was 29% (n = 13) and was significantly higher in the blunt chest trauma group than in the penetrating trauma group (45% vs 16%; p = 0.04). Lung parenchyma injuries (lacerations and contusions) were the most common intraoperative findings in both groups. The following independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were found: an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of >40; an Acute Physiology and Chronic Evaluation II (APACHE II) score of >30; prolonged duration of UT; low body temperature on admission to the ED; abnormal arterial blood lactate, bicarbonate, and pH at the end of UT; and use of vasopressors during the first 24 hours of ICU stay. CONCLUSION: Mortality after UT was higher in patients with blunt chest trauma. The UT should be performed in both penetrating and blunt chest trauma as quickly as possible and should be limited to damage control. It also emerges that acidosis and hypothermia in chest trauma patients need to be treated extremely aggressively before, during, and after UT.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery in Re-Do Cases-The New Standard Procedure?

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is superior to "classical" mitral valve surgery via a sternotomy regarding wound healing and postoperative pain. It is however a more challenging procedure. Patients' preference is leading clearly toward minimally invasive approaches, and surgeons are driven by upcoming new technologies in interventional procedures such as the MitraClip. Especially in re-do cases, the access via right mini-thoracotomy, as previously non-operated situs, is a possible advantage over a re-sternotomy. We therefore retrospectively analyzed our result regarding MIMVS in re-do cases at our institute. METHODS: From January 2011 and June 2016, 33 operations were MIMVS re-do procedures. Mean age was 60 years (±16 years), and 51% were male. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent were elective cases, 29% were urgent cases, and 9% were emergency operations. Operation times, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times, and clamp times were 235 minutes (±51 min), 149 minutes (±42 min), and 62 minutes (±45min), respectively. Mitral valve repair and replacement was performed in 24% (n = 8) and 76% (n = 25), respectively. Overall in-hospital mortality, apoplexy, and re-operation rates (all for bleeding) were 0% (n = 0), 3% (n = 1), and 9% (n = 3). New onset of dialysis was required in two (6%) patients. Two (6%) patients developed superficial wound infection. Overall intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay was 3 days (±4 days) and 15 days (±7 days), respectively. CONCLUSION: MIMVS for re-do cases can be performed with minimal mortality and morbidity and therefore represents a safe alternative to conventional mitral valve surgery in cardiac re-do operations. However, postoperative morbidity is highly dependent on preoperative patient status.

Minimally Invasive, Isolated Tricuspid Valve Redo Surgery: A Safety and Outcome Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is considered a high risk-procedure. The optimal surgical approach is controversial. We analyzed our experience with isolated TV redo surgery performed either minimally invasively (redo-MITS) or through sternotomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all patients with previous cardiac surgery who underwent redo-MITS (n = 26) and compared them to redo-Sternotomy (n = 17). A group of primary-MITS (n = 61) served as control. RESULTS: The redo-MITS approach consisted of a right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy, transpericardial right atrial access, and beating heart TV surgery without caval occlusion. Redo-MITS patients were oldest and had the most comorbidities (EuroScore II: 9.83 ± 6.05% versus redo-Sternotomy: 8.42 ± 7.33% versus primary-MITS: 4.15 ± 4.84%). There were no intraoperative complications or conversions to sternotomy in both MITS groups. Redo-Sternotomy had the highest 30-day mortality (24%), the poorest long-term survival, and the highest perioperative complication rate. Redo-MITS did not differ in perioperative outcome from primary-MITS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified redo-Sternotomy (odds ratio [OR] = 9.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88-63.26), liver cirrhosis (OR = 9.88; 95% CI 2.20-54.20), and body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.02-1.35) as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. The Cox model revealed redo-Sternotomy (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.67; 95% CI 1.18-6.03), liver cirrhosis (HR = 3.31; 95% CI 1.45-7.58), and pulmonary hypertension (HR = 2.26; 95% CI 1.04-4.92) as risk factors for poor long-term survival. TV surgery significantly reduces NYHA class. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive, isolated TV surgery as reoperation without caval occlusion and on the beating heart can be safe and may improve clinical outcome.

Right Anterolateral Minithoracotomy versus Median Sternotomy Approach for Resection of Left Atrial Myxoma.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard approach for several cardiac diseases. In this retrospective study, we compared right anterolateral minithoracotomy (RALT) with standard median sternotomy (SMS) for resection of left atrial myxoma (LAM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to June 2015, the clinical data of patients who underwent RALT (n = 30) and SMS (n = 36) for resection of LAM in our hospital were collected. The preoperative clinical data and operative results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time between the two groups. The total incision length was significantly shorter in RALT group compared with SMS group (p < 0.001). For RALT and SMS groups, respectively, the intensive care unit length of stay was 29.2 ± 6.5 versus 43.5 ± 6.9 hours (p < 0.001), and the postoperative hospital length of stay was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 4-6) versus 8 days (IQR: 7-10) (p < 0.001). The total cost in RALT group was 27,000 RMB (IQR: 25,000-29,000) versus 33,000 RMB (IQR: 31,000-35,000) in SMS group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mortality and postoperative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: RALT approach for LAM resection can be performed safely with favorable cosmetic outcome, accepted clinical results, and lower cost. It should be considered as a promising alternative to SMS and merit additional study.

Resternotomy Plus Left Thoracotomy Surgery after Previous Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair.

BACKGROUND: As the results of acute type A aortic dissection repair have improved, late reoperation for residual dissection has become increasingly important. We report our experience of graft replacement via extended approaches after a previous acute type A aortic dissection repair. METHODS: From April 2003 to September 2016, 17 patients underwent reoperation via extended (repeat median sternotomy plus left thoracotomy) approaches after a previous repair of an acute type A aortic dissection at the Matsubara Tokushukai Hospital in Japan and were included in the analyses (males, 16; mean age at surgery, 60.0 ± 9.3 years). RESULTS: The postoperative stroke and in-hospital mortality rates were 0 and 5.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Extended approach after a previous acute type A aortic dissection repair showed acceptable outcomes.

Combined surgical treatment of esophageal cancer and coronary heart diseases in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE: The co-incidence of esophageal cancer and coronary heart disease (CHD) is increasing in elderly patients. This study was carried out to analyze the efficiency and safety of simultaneous esophagectomy and cardiac surgery in a selected group of elderly patients. METHODS: Prospective database for coexistency of severe CHD and esophageal or esophageal-gastric junction cancer was firstly reviewed. Twenty-two patients undergoing combined surgical interventions, including first beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting (off-pump CABG) and then esophagectomy, were involved as group A. Then, 44 patients undergoing isolated esophagectomy were selected as group B using the propensity score matching method. Data including clinic pathological characteristics and postoperative outcomes were investigated. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used. RESULTS: The surgical procedure was performed through left lateral thoracotomy in all patients, except one patient in group A who received median sternotomy and left lateral thoracotomy. The operation time and blood loss were both more in group A, as a result of two operations performed at one session. Patients in both groups were followed up from 1.3 to 78.3 months. No significant between-group was found in overall survival or relapse-free survival. CONCLUSION: The risk of simultaneous esophagectomy and cardiac surgery is not high. Despite certain differences in clinical indicators between groups, the safety of simultaneous procedures in group A is evident. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR 1800014498 . Registered 17 January 2018.

[The first episode of spontaneous pneumothorax (errors, hazards, complications)]. / Oshibki, opasnosti, oslozhneniia pri pervom épizode spontannogo pnevmotoraksa.

AIM: To analyze the errors and complications of surgical care in patients with the first episode of spontaneous pneumothorax at different hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2005 to 2015 three hundreds and seventeen patients with the first episode of spontaneous pneumothorax have been treated at the thoracic department of Volgograd State Medical University. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 79 of them underwent thoracotomy while in 238 cases minimally invasive technologies were applied. Faster preoperative management and earlier active surgical tactics were suggested. RESULTS: There were 6 the most typical violations of surgical care in 42% of patients with the first episode of spontaneous pneumothorax. Medical and diagnostic violations at regional centers and central district hospitals were the same, but there were differences in certain types of errors and their incidence. Minimally invasive technologies do not significantly affect the number of violations of thoracic surgery principles. Early procedures against the recurrence by using of thoracoscopic interventions reduce postoperative morbidity from 1.2 to 0.3% and mortality by 8.25 times.

Are Thoracotomy and/or Intrathoracic Anastomosis Still Predictors of Postoperative Mortality After Esophageal Cancer Surgery?: A Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: Intrathoracic (vs cervical) anastomosis and a thoracotomy (vs absence) have previously been associated with increasing postoperative mortality (POM). Recent improvements in surgical practices and perioperative management may have changed these dogmas. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of performing intrathoracic anastomosis and/or thoracotomy on POM after esophageal cancer surgery in recent years. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery with reconstruction between 2010 and 2012 in France were included (n = 3286). Patients with a thoracoscopic approach were excluded (n = 4). We compared 30-day POM between patients having received intrathoracic (vs cervical) anastomosis and between those having received a thoracotomy or not. Multivariate analyses and propensity score matching were used to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: Patients had either cervical (n = 548) or intrathoracic (n = 2738) anastomosis. Thirty-day POM was higher after cervical anastomosis (8.8% vs 4.9%, P < 0.001). Having received a thoracotomy (n = 3061) was associated with a decreased risk of 30-day POM (5.3% vs 9.3%, P = 0.011). After adjustment for confounding factors, cervical anastomosis was associated with 30-day POM [odds ratio (OR) 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.77); P = 0.032], whereas performing a thoracotomy was not associated with 30-day POM (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.51-1.84; P = 0.926). CONCLUSIONS: Nowadays, intrathoracic anastomosis provides a lower 30-day POM rate compared to cervical anastomosis, and performing a thoracotomy is not associated with POM. Systematic anastomosis neck placement or thoracotomy avoidance is not a relevant argument anymore to decrease POM.