Classification of Stroke Patients With Dysphagia Into Subgroups Based on Patterns of Submental Muscle Strength and Skill Impairment.

OBJECTIVES: To identify and characterize subgroups of stroke patients with clinical signs of dysphagia, based on swallowing-related strength and skill impairments of the submental muscle group. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation centers and community dwellings. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=114), including stroke patients with dysphagia (n=55) and 2 control groups including myopathic patients with dysphagia (n=19) and healthy volunteers (n=40) were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Novel clinical assessment of strength (force generation) and skill (spatial and temporal precision of muscle activation) of the submental muscle group during swallowing and nonswallowing behaviors, using surface electromyography and dynamometry. RESULTS: Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed 4 clusters, which could be broadly characterized as cluster 1: intact strength and skill, cluster 2: poor strength and poor nonswallowing skill, cluster 3: poor strength, and cluster 4: poor strength and poor swallowing skill. Membership in cluster was significantly associated with medical diagnosis (P<.001). The majority of healthy and myopathic participants were assigned to clusters 1 and 3, respectively, whereas stroke patients were found in all 4 clusters. Skill outcome measures were more predictive of cluster assignment than strength measures. CONCLUSIONS: Although healthy and myopathic participants demonstrated predominantly homogeneous swallowing patterns of submental muscle function within their etiology, several subgroups were identified within stroke, possibly reflecting different subtypes of swallowing function. Future research should focus on the nature and rehabilitation needs of these subtypes. Assessment of skill in swallowing may be an important but overlooked aspect of rehabilitation.

Clinical reasoning and hypothesis generation in expert clinical swallowing examinations.

BACKGROUND: A clinical swallow examination (CSE) provides integral information that informs the diagnostic decision-making process within dysphagia management. However, multiple studies have highlighted a high degree of reported variability within the CSE process. It has been hypothesized that such variability may be the result of the clinical reasoning process rather than poor practices. AIMS: To elucidate the nature of expert, speech-language therapists' (SLTs) clinical reasoning during an initial bedside assessment of patients referred for suspected dysphagia in the acute care environment. METHODS & PROCEDURES: An exploratory 'observation of practice' qualitative methodology was used to achieve the aim. Four expert SLTs, from two clinical services, completed CSEs with 10 new referrals for suspected dysphagia. All assessments were video-recorded, and within 30 min of completing the CSE, a video-stimulated 'think aloud' semi-structured interview was conducted in which the SLT was prompted to articulate their clinical reasoning at each stage of the CSE. Three types of concept maps were generated based on this video and interview content: a descriptive concept map, a reasoning map and a hypothesis map. Patterns that consistently characterized the assessment process were identified, including the overall structure; types of reasoning (inductive versus deductive), facts (i.e., clinical information) drawn upon; and outcomes of the process (diagnosis and recommendations). Interview content was examined to identify types of expert reasoning strategies using during the CSE. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: SLTs' approach to clinical assessment followed a consistent structure, with data gathered pre-bedside, during the patient interview and direct assessment before a management recommendation was made. Within this structure, SLTs engaged in an iterative approach with inductive hypothesis-generating and deductive hypothesis-testing, with each decision-making pathway individually tailored and informed by patient-specific facts collected during the assessment. Clinical assessment was primarily geared towards management of an initial acute presentation with less focus on formulating a diagnostic statement. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Variability in reported dysphagia practice is likely the result of a patient-centred assessment process characterized by iterative cycles of fact-gathering in order to generate and test clinical hypotheses. This has implications for the development of novel assessment tools, as well as professional development and education of novice SLTs. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject CSE practices are reportedly variable, which has led to calls for more stringent, standardized assessment tools. Emerging evidence suggests that this variation is non-random, but may arise from clinical reasoning processes. What this paper adds to existing knowledge We directly observed expert SLTs conducting CSEs and identified patterns in practice that were consistent across all CSEs evaluated. These patterns were consistent in structure, whereas the content of the assessment items varied and was tailored to individual patient presentation. Overall, expert SLTs engaged in balanced cycles of inductive hypothesis generation and deductive hypothesis-testing, a hallmark of good clinical assessment and practice. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Ensuring quality CSE requires a more nuanced approach that considers the role of clinical reasoning in SLTs' decision-making and the potential unintended negative consequences of standardized assessment tools.

Ineffective Esophageal Motility Is Associated with Impaired Bolus Clearance but Does Not Correlate with Severity of Dysphagia.

BACKGROUND: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is defined as a distal contractile integral < 450 mmHg/s/cm in at least 50% of ten liquid swallows on high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). Whether this latest definition correlates with degree of symptoms has not been studied. METHODS: Patients presenting for HREM prospectively rated their symptoms using the Eckardt score. Topography plots were retrospectively reviewed and classified according to the latest Chicago Classification. Patients with non-obstructive dysphagia and an Eckardt score of at least 1 were included. Patients with major motility disorders were excluded. Scores between patients with IEM (group A) and patients with normal classification (group B) were compared using two-tailed t-tests. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated to determine correlation between symptoms and percent bolus clearance. RESULTS: A total of 241 patients were screened; 33 patients met criteria for group A and 44 patients for group B. There was no difference between the two groups in mean symptom severity for dysphagia (1.63 vs. 1.61, P = 0.89), chest pain (0.67 vs. 0.75, P = 0.64), regurgitation (1.06 vs. 0.85, P = 0.32), or weight loss (0.85 vs. 0.49, P = 0.11). The percent bolus clearance was significantly lower in group A (46.5% vs. 76.7%, P > 0.01). There was a moderate inverse correlation between dysphagia and percent bolus clearance (R = - 0.37) in group A, but none in group B (R = 0.09). CONCLUSION: The classification of IEM did not discriminate from normal studies for symptom severity in our cohort. However, patients with IEM did have an inverse correlation between dysphagia score and bolus clearance, but those without IEM did not. Adding impedance information to the motor pattern classification should be considered in the symptom assessment in minor motility disorders.

The predictive dysphagia score (PreDyScore) in the short- and medium-term post-stroke: a putative tool in PEG indication.

PURPOSE: We performed an evaluation of dysphagia in an unselected series of strokes to identify factors causing persisting dysphagia at 1 month after onset and to formulate a predictive score. METHODS: We evaluated the association between dysphagia and clinical aspects (univariate analysis) at the 7th and 30th days after admission. We performed a multivariate logistic regression at the 30th day on the factors that were significant. We computed a simple score for predicting persistent dysphagia. RESULTS: We recruited 249 patients. At the 7th day, 94 patients were dysphagic (37.75%). Factors associated with dysphagia included TACI (OR 3.85), mRS ≥ 3 (OR 4.45), malnutrition (OR 2.69), and BMI ≥ 20 (OR 0.52). At the 30th day, 217 patients remained in the study, and dysphagia persisted in 75 (36.76%). The factors that were associated with dysphagia were age > 74 years (OR 1.99), TACI (OR 5.82), mRS score ≥ 3 (OR 4.31), malnutrition (OR 3.27), and BMI ≥ 20 (OR 0.45). The multivariate analysis indicated that mRS ≥ 3 (OR 1.80) and BMI ≥ 20 (OR 0.45) remained significantly associated with dysphagia. The best correlation with dysphagia was the sum of mRS and the reciprocal of the BMI multiplied by 100 ((mRS + 1 ∕ BMI) × 100). We named this score PreDyScore that ranged between 3.7 and 10.47. Using < 6 and > 8 as cutoffs, the sensitivity was 67.03%, and the specificity 95.65%. CONCLUSION: BMI < 20 and mRS ≥ 3 are easily measurable bedside predictive factors of persistent dysphagia. PreDyScore showed good sensitivity and very good specificity and enables the prediction of persistent dysphagia with great accuracy in any clinical setting.

Grading Dysphagia as a Toxicity of Head and Neck Cancer: Differences in Severity Classification Based on MBS DIGEST and Clinical CTCAE Grades.

Clinician-reported toxicity grading through common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) stages dysphagia based on symptoms, diet, and tube dependence. The new dynamic imaging grade of swallowing toxicity (DIGEST) tool offers a similarly scaled five-point ordinal summary grade of pharyngeal swallowing as determined through results of a modified barium swallow (MBS) study. This study aims to inform clinicians on the similarities and differences between dysphagia severity according to clinical CTCAE and MBS-derived DIGEST grading. A cross-sectional sample of 95 MBS studies was randomly selected from a prospectively-acquired MBS database among patients treated with organ preservation strategies for head and neck cancer. MBS DIGEST and clinical CTCAE dysphagia grades were compared. DIGEST and CTCAE dysphagia grades had "fair" agreement per weighted κ of 0.358 (95% CI .231-.485). Using a threshold of DIGEST ≥ 3 as reference, CTCAE had an overall sensitivity of 0.50, specificity of 0.84, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.67 to identify severe MBS-detected dysphagia. At less than 6 months, sensitivity was 0.72, specificity was 0.76, and AUC was 0.75 while at greater than 6 months, sensitivity was 0.22, specificity was 0.90, and AUC was 0.56 for CTCAE to detect dysphagia as determined by DIGEST. Classification of pharyngeal dysphagia on MBS using DIGEST augments our understanding of dysphagia severity according to the clinically-derived CTCAE while maintaining the simplicity of an ordinal scale. DIGEST likely complements CTCAE toxicity grading through improved specificity for physiologic dysphagia in the acute phase and improved sensitivity for dysphagia in the late-phase.

[Myasthenia gravis should be considered in cases of Parkinson's disease and progressive dysphagia]. / Bei Morbus Parkinson und progredienter Dysphagie an Myasthenia gravis denken.

We report on four consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease, in whom anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive bulbar myasthenia gravis (MG) turned out to be responsible for progressive dysphagia.

The Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System in a population-based sample of preschool children with cerebral palsy.

AIM: To determine (1) the reproducibility of the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS); (2) EDACS classification distribution in a population-based cohort with cerebral palsy (CP); and (3) the relationships between the EDACS and clinical mealtime assessment, other classifications, and health outcomes. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional population-based cohort study of 170 children with CP at 3 years to 5 years (mean 57.6mo, standard deviation [SD] 8.3mo; 105 males, n=65 females). Functional abilities were representative of a population sample (Gross Motor Function Classification System level I=74, II=34, III=21, IV=18, V=23). The EDACS was the primary classification of mealtime function. The Dysphagia Disorders Survey was the clinical mealtime assessment. Gross motor function was classified using the Gross Motor Function Classification System. RESULTS: EDACS classification had 88.3% intrarater agreement (κ=0.84, intraclass correlation coefficient=0.95; p<0.001) and 51.7% interrater agreement (κ=0.36, intraclass correlation coefficient=0.79; p<0.001). In total, 56.5% of children were classified as EDACS level I. There was a strong stepwise relationship between the Dysphagia Disorders Survey and EDACS (r=0.96, p<0.001). Parental stress (odds ratio=1.3, p=0.05) and feeding tubes (odds ratio=6.4, p<0.001) were significantly related to more limited function on the EDACS. INTERPRETATION: The EDACS presents a viable adjunct to clinical assessment of feeding skills in children with CP for use in surveillance trials and clinical practice. A rating addendum would be a useful contribution to the tool to enhance reproducibility.

Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Arabic Version of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) is a 10-item self-administered questionnaire. It is a noninvasive tool to measure patients' perception of their swallowing problems. The purposes of the present study were to develop an Arabic version of the EAT-10 and to evaluate its validity, consistency, and reliability in the Arabic-speaking population with oropharyngeal dysphagia. SETTING AND DESIGN: This was a prospective study carried out at the Communication and Swallowing Disorders Unit, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Arabic EAT-10 was administered to 138 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and 83 control subjects. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. Content and clinical validity were studied, and the EAT-10 results were compared across patients and control groups. RESULTS: The Arabic EAT-10 showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92). Also, good test-retest reliability was found for the total scores of the Arabic EAT-10 (intraclass correlation = 0.73). There was a significant difference in Arabic EAT-10 scores between the oropharyngeal dysphagia group and the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the Arabic EAT-10 is a valid tool that can be used for screening of dysphagia-related problems in an Arabic-speaking population.

[Validation of the German short version of the Murray Secretion Rating Scale]. / Validierung der deutschen Kurzversion der Sekretbeurteilungsskala nach Murray.

OBJECTIVE: Accumulation of secretions in hypopharynx, aditus vestibule, and trachea is often found in cases of severe dysphagia and is considered a cardinal trait of high clinical and therapeutic importance. For the graduation of the severity level of accumulated secretions, a short version of the 4-point Murray secretion scale is available, which is also integrated into the protocol of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) according to the Langmore standard. This study aimed at the validation of the German translation of this short version in order to facilitate a uniform, standardized evaluation of the accumulation of secretions in dysphagic patients in the German language area. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For the examination of reliability and validity, a reference standard was defined by 2 dysphagia experts on the basis of 40 video files of the FEES examination, 10 videos for each of the severity grades. Afterwards, these videos were rated independently by 4 raters and re-rated in a new randomized order 2 weeks later. RESULTS: Both the intra-rater reliability (τ>0,830***) and the inter-rater reliability (Kendalls W>0,890***) were highly significant and can be considered good. The same is valid for the correlation of ratings with the reference standard (τ=0,969***). CONCLUSIONS: The German translation of the short version of the 4-point Murray secretion scale is recommendable as a reliable and valid instrument for the graduation of the cardinal trait of oropharyngeal dysphagia and also as an evidence-based instrument for standardized use in the German language area.

Dose-volume response in acute dysphagia toxicity: Validating QUANTEC recommendations into clinical practice for head and neck radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the validity of QUANTEC recommendations in predicting acute dysphagia using intensity-modulated head and neck radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck +/- systemic therapy were analyzed. Multiple dose parameters for the larynx (V50Gy, Dmean and Dmax) were recorded. Acute dysphagia toxicity was prospectively scored in all treatment weeks (week 1-6 or 1-7) using CTCAEv3 by three blinded investigators. QUANTEC larynx recommendations (V50Gy < 27%, Dmean < 44 Gy, Dmean < 40 Gy, Dmax < 66 Gy) were used to group the cohort (i.e. V50Gy < 27% vs. V50Gy > 27%). The proportion of patients with Grade 3 dysphagia was compared within each group. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the incidence of grade 3 toxicity in the V50Gy < or > 27% group at week 5 (14.3% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.01) and 6 (25.9% vs. 65.9%, p < 0.01). A significant reduction at week 5 (14.7% vs. 50.0, p = 0.02) and 6 (32.4% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.01) was seen in Dmean < 44 Gy when compared to Dmean > 44 Gy. Dmean < 40 Gy also delivered a significant reduction at week 5 (5.6% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.01) and week 6 (23.5% vs. 59.3%, p = 0.01). A significant toxicity reduction at treatment week 6 (28.0% vs. 63.0%, p = 0 < 01) was seen from Dmax < 66 Gy to Dmax > 66 Gy. V50Gy > 27% (p < 0.01), Dmean > 40 Gy (p = 0.01) and Dmax > 66 Gy (p < 0.01) were also predictors of Grade 3 dysphagia when analyzed with multiple clinical risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: QUANTEC late toxicity recommendations for dose to larynx during IMRT are a useful predictor for acute dysphagia toxicity in this patient cohort. Furthermore, this included chemoradiotherapy regimes and post-operative radiotherapy patients, allowing for prophylactic implementation of supportive care measures.

The normative range for and age and gender effects on the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ).

The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) is a validated measure of the symptomatic severity of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia. Up until now no normative ranges have been established for the questionnaire. This is a limitation in its utility as it makes it difficult to use the tool to identify the prevalence and burden of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia in the general population or within patient populations. The study's aim was to derive the normative range of dysphagia scores for the SSQ and to determine whether, in nondysphagic individuals, there are any age or gender effects on these scores. The questionnaire was administered to 73 eligible nondysphagic individuals who had been screened for any dysphagia or conditions that might predispose them to dysphagia. The frequency distribution of SSQ scores was first examined for normality and appropriate transformations performed before determining the upper limit of normal. Of the 73 healthy participants, 45 were male, and the cohort had a mean age of 58.6 years (range = 22.0-82.1 years). No statistically significant relationship between SSQ scores and either age (r s[73] = 0.140, p = 0.239) or gender (r pb[73] = 0.021, p = 0.857) was found. The mean total SSQ score (maximum possible score = 1,700) was 59.0 (SD = 56.7; range = 2-241). The frequency distribution of scores was non-normal and markedly skewed. After a Box-Cox transformation to normalise the distribution, the calculated upper limit of the reference interval was 234 with a 90 % CI of [193, 277]. The SSQ scores in a nondysphagic population are not influenced by age or gender. These data complement the existing reliability and validation data and thereby improve the overall utility of the SSQ in the context of future studies of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia prevalence, efficacy, and outcome.

Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to people with dysphagia following non-surgical head and neck cancer management.

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) is an internationally recognized framework which allows its user to describe the consequences of a health condition on an individual in the context of their environment. With growing recognition that dysphagia can have broad ranging physical and psychosocial impacts, the aim of this paper was to identify the ICF domains and categories that describe the full functional impact of dysphagia following non-surgical head and neck cancer (HNC) management, from the perspective of the person with dysphagia. A secondary analysis was conducted on previously published qualitative study data which explored the lived experiences of dysphagia of 24 individuals with self-reported swallowing difficulties following HNC management. Categories and sub-categories identified by the qualitative analysis were subsequently mapped to the ICF using the established linking rules to develop a set of ICF codes relevant to the impact of dysphagia following HNC management. The 69 categories and sub-categories that had emerged from the qualitative analysis were successfully linked to 52 ICF codes. The distribution of these codes across the ICF framework revealed that the components of Body Functions, Activities and Participation, and Environmental Factors were almost equally represented. The findings confirm that the ICF is a valuable framework for representing the complexity and multifaceted impact of dysphagia following HNC. This list of ICF codes, which reflect the diverse impact of dysphagia associated with HNC on the individual, can be used to guide more holistic assessment and management for this population.

Quality of life related to swallowing in Parkinson's disease.

Swallowing difficulties in Parkinson's disease can result in decreased quality of life. The swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) is an instrument for specifically assessing quality of life with respect to swallowing, which has been little explored in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The goal of this study was to evaluate the quality of life with respect to swallowing in persons with PD compared to controls and at several stages of the disease using the SWAL-QOL. The experimental group was composed of 62 persons with PD at stages 1-4. Forty-one age-matched healthy subjects constituted the control group. The SWAL-QOL scores were significantly lower for the patients with PD than for the controls in all SWAL-QOL domains. Eating duration had the largest difference in score between persons with PD and the controls and the lowest mean score, followed by communication, fatigue, fear, sleep, and food selection. The scores of most domains were lower at later stages of the disease. The scores for eating duration, symptom frequency, and sleep were significantly lower at stage 4 than stages 1 and 2. In conclusion, patients with PD have significantly lower scores in all domains of the SWAL-QOL than normal controls. This means swallowing difficulties occurring in patients with PD negatively affect their QOL. Progression of the disease worsens swallowing QOL, more specifically in the domains of eating duration, symptom frequency, and sleep. This occurs mostly at later stages of the disease.

Content validity of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for multiple sclerosis from the perspective of speech and language therapists.

BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a comprehensive framework to structure the information obtained in multidisciplinary clinical settings according to the biopsychosocial perspective of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and to guide the treatment and rehabilitation process accordingly. It is now undergoing validation from the user perspective for which it has been developed in the first place. AIMS: To validate the content of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for MS from the perspective of speech and language therapists (SLTs) involved in the treatment of persons with MS (PwMS). METHODS & PROCEDURES: Within a three-round e-mail-based Delphi Study 34 SLTs were asked about PwMS' problems, resources and aspects of the environment treated by SLTs. Responses were linked to ICF categories. Identified ICF categories were compared with those included in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for MS to examine its content validity. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Thirty-four SLTs named 524 problems and resources, as well as aspects of environment. Statements were linked to 129 ICF categories (60 Body-functions categories, two Body-structures categories, 42 Activities-&-participation categories, and 25 Environmental-factors categories). SLTs confirmed 46 categories in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set. Twenty-one ICF categories were identified as not-yet-included categories. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: This study contributes to the content validity of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for MS from the perspective of SLTs. Study participants agreed on a few not-yet-included categories that should be further discussed for inclusion in a revised version of the Comprehensive ICF Core Set to strengthen SLTs' perspective in PwMS' neurorehabilitation.

[Penetration-Aspiration Scale according to Rosenbek. Validation of the German version for endoscopic dysphagia diagnostics]. / Penetrations-Aspirations-Skala nach Rosenbek. Validierung der deutschen Version für die endoskopische Dysphagiediagnostik.

BACKGROUND: The Penetration-Aspiration Scale was developed by Rosenbek et al. to enable standardized documentation of this cardinal symptom of a swallowing disorder. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to create and validate a German version of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale according to the guidelines governing the translation of foreign language measurement tools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both reliability and validity were examined based on the ratings of 80 randomized endoscopically evaluated swallows, 10 for each severity level. Ratings were carried out by four independent raters: two with more than 3 years' experience with dysphagia and a further two with less than 3 years' experience. The swallows were rerated after 4 weeks. RESULTS: Both intrarater (Kendall's Tau: τs > 0.643; median 0.773; ps < 0.001) and interrater reliability were highly significant (two-way mixed single ICC coefficient of 0.799 for the first rating session and 0.728 for the second session; ps < 0.001). Results from the raters with less than 3 years' experience were significantly different from the reference standard in three out of four cases, whereas this was not the case for the more experienced raters. However, for each film, the median of the individual ratings from all four raters correlated almost perfectly with the reference standard (first rating session: τ = 0.894; second rating session: τ = 0.843; ps < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The German version of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale according to Rosenbek presented here was demonstrated to be both reliable and valid. Despite its dependency on the raters' experience, it can therefore be used as a graduation instrument for swallowing disorders in German-speaking countries and make an important contribution to evidence-based medicine in dysphagiology for both clinical and scientific use.

Changes of timing variables in swallowing of boluses with different viscosities in patients with dysphagia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the timing of the swallowing process and the effect of bolus viscosity on swallowing. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: General teaching hospital, rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled patients with dysphagia (n=82) in a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) from January 13, 2009, to October 22, 2009. Based on VFSS results, we classified patients as "thin-fluid aspirators" (n=40) or as "nonaspirators" (n=42). INTERVENTIONS: Swallowing of a 5-mL thick bolus and a 5-mL thin bolus in all patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kinematic analysis of various variables during the swallowing process (pharyngeal phase), including epiglottis contact with the bolus, laryngeal elevation, pharyngeal constriction, and upper esophageal sphincter opening. RESULTS: In both groups, the thin bolus arrived at the vallecular pouch earlier than the thick bolus. During swallowing of the thick bolus, the thin-fluid aspirators had a delayed latency of upper esophageal sphincter opening, delayed laryngeal elevation to peak level, and significantly longer rise time of laryngeal elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate clear differences in the degree of adaptation to bolus viscosity between patients classified as thin-fluid aspirators and as nonaspirators. These differences were mainly in activities of laryngeal elevators rather than pharyngeal constrictors.

Laser diverticulotomy for Zenker's diverticulum--does it improve quality of life?

To determine quality of life (QoL) in individuals with dysphagia related to identified Zenker's diverticulum before (T1) and one year after undergoing endoscopic laser diverticulotomy surgery (T2). A total of 43 individuals (18 women and 25 men) were included at T1 and 37 of these responded at T2 (13 women and 24 men). Health-related QoL (HRQoL) was determined with the short form 36 (SF-36) and disease-specific QoL (DSQoL) was assessed with the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). In addition, two questions about specific symptoms related to Zenker's diverticulum were added and ordered as a fifth subscale of MDADI. Comparisons were made between patients and an age- and gender-adjusted normative sample from the Norwegian population. Significant differences were found in all subscales on MDADI, but none between T1 and T2 on SF-36. Compared to the normative sample, the component score MCS of SF-36 was significantly lower in the dysphagia patients at both T1 and T2. The attrition sample had significantly lower PCS than the completers. The results substantiate that disease severity is associated with poorer disease-related QoL, and that the disease-specific QoL is significantly improved one year after laser diverticulotomy.

Validation of the Japanese translation of the Swallowing Disturbance Questionnaire in Parkinson's disease patients.

PURPOSE: The Swallowing Disturbance Questionnaire (SDQ) was developed as a self-rated screening tool for dysphagia in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We developed the Japanese version of this questionnaire (SDQ-J), according to the cross-cultural adaptation guidelines, and examined its reliability. METHODS: Subjects were 61 Japanese patients with PD (mean age, 67.0 ± 9.2 years) who answered the SDQ-J before undergoing videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing (VF). We compared the findings of the questionnaire with the patients' aspiration status during VF. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the 15 questions of the SDQ-J was 0.84. According to the SDQ-J, 15 patients (24.6%) were diagnosed with dysphagia, while 9 patients (14.8%) aspirated liquid during VF. The sensitivity and specificity of the SDQ-J in predicting aspiration were 77.8 and 84.6%, respectively; therefore, the SDQ-J significantly predicted aspiration during VF (P < 0.01). The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the SDQ-J were 0.46 and 0.96, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SDQ-J appears to be a reliable and useful screening tool for Japanese PD patients with aspiration. As the NPV was higher than the PPV in the SDQ-J, this questionnaire could potentially be used for early identification of severe dysphagia in patients with PD.

Molecular characterization of fungal populations on the tongue dorsum of institutionalized elderly adults.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the global composition of oral fungal populations in frail elderly adults and to investigate the relationship with their health status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the fungal populations on the tongue dorsum in 291 institutionalized elderly adults by molecular PCR-based techniques using internal transcribed spacer regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA. RESULTS: Quantitative PCR analysis showed that fungi were present on the tongue dorsum of 128 subjects at ≥10(4) CFU per sample, and 35 of them exceeded 10(5) CFU per sample. Length heterogeneity-PCR analysis and nucleotide sequence determinations showed that Candida albicans was most frequently detected in those subjects with fungi at ≥10(4) CFU per sample (105 subjects), followed by Candida dubliniensis (78), Malassezia restricta (57), and Candida tropicalis (45). Statistical analysis revealed that those subjects with ≥10(5) CFU of fungi other than C. albicans per sample had an increased risk of fever (≥7 febrile days per 12 months) compared with subjects with <10(5) CFU per sample, after adjustment for other fever-associated confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the oral cavity of the elderly is inhabited by a diverse array of fungi not limited to typical Candida species and they suggest that the diversity in distribution is associated with health status.