The World Needs a Staph Vaccine-New Research Could Bring It a Step Closer.

This Medical News article discusses recent findings that help explain Staphylococcus aureus vaccine failures.

Lethal CD4 T Cell Responses Induced by Vaccination Against Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Multiple candidate vaccines against Staphylococcus aureus infections have failed in clinical trials. Analysis of a recent prematurely halted vaccine trial revealed increased mortality rates among vaccine recipients in whom postsurgical S. aureus infection developed, emphasizing the potential for induction of detrimental immune responses and the need to better understand the requirements for protective immunity against S. aureus. These failures of single-antigen vaccines have prompted ongoing development of multicomponent vaccines to target the multitude of S. aureus virulence factors. In the current study, we used lethally irradiated S. aureus as a model multicomponent vaccine and showed that vaccination of mice decreased survival in a bacteremia challenge model. These deleterious effects were due to a CD4 T-cell-dependent interferon γ response and could be prevented by inhibiting development of this response during vaccination. Our results identify the potential for vaccination to induce pathological immune responses, and they have implications for recent vaccine failures and the design of future staphylococcal vaccines.

[Immunogenic properties of experimental production series of Staphylovac-2 vaccine].

AIM: Study experimental production series of Staphylovac-2 by accumulation of specific IgG and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental production samples of staphylococci vaccines were studied by the accumulation of specific IgG in sera of immunized BALB/c line mice in EIA. Safety was evaluated in tests of acute and chronic toxicity including pathomorphologic and histologic, hematologic and biochemical studies, studies of the effect on central nervous system. RESULTS: A statistically significant (2.6 - 3.0 times) increase of IgG levels in sera of immunized mice compared with control was noted. In the experiments studying acute and chronic toxicity the increase in body mass and mass of internal organs differed from data obtained from control animals at no observation periods. None of the studied methods of safety evaluation showed differences of the studied vaccine series from the control. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for subcutaneous administration into human of 200 µg is experimentally justified and could be the basis for carrying out clinical studies of staphylococci vaccines in humans.

Effect of an investigational vaccine for preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections after cardiothoracic surgery: a randomized trial.

IMPORTANCE: Infections due to Staphylococcus aureus are serious complications of cardiothoracic surgery. A novel vaccine candidate (V710) containing the highly conserved S. aureus iron surface determinant B is immunogenic and generally well tolerated in volunteers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative vaccination in preventing serious postoperative S. aureus infection in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, randomized, event-driven trial conducted between December 2007 and August 2011 among 8031 patients aged 18 years or older who were scheduled for full median sternotomy within 14 to 60 days of vaccination at 165 sites in 26 countries. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to receive a single 0.5-mL intramuscular injection of either V710 vaccine, 60 µg (n = 4015), or placebo (n = 4016). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was prevention of S. aureus bacteremia and/or deep sternal wound infection (including mediastinitis) through postoperative day 90. Secondary end points included all S. aureus surgical site and invasive infections through postoperative day 90. Three interim analyses with futility assessments were planned. RESULTS: The independent data monitoring committee recommended termination of the study after the second interim analysis because of safety concerns and low efficacy. At the end of the study, the V710 vaccine was not significantly more efficacious than placebo in preventing either the primary end points (22/3528 V710 vaccine recipients [2.6 per 100 person-years] vs 27/3517 placebo recipients [3.2 per 100 person-years]; relative risk, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.44-1.48; P = .58) or secondary end points despite eliciting robust antibody responses. Compared with placebo, the V710 vaccine was associated with more adverse experiences during the first 14 days after vaccination (1219/3958 vaccine recipients [30.8%; 95% CI, 29.4%-32.3%] and 866/3967 placebo recipients [21.8%; 95% CI, 20.6%-23.1%], including 797 [20.1%; 95% CI, 18.9%-21.4%] and 378 [9.5%; 95% CI, 8.6%-10.5%] with injection site reactions and 66 [1.7%; 95% CI, 1.3%-2.1%] and 51 [1.3%; 95% CI, 1.0%-1.7%] with serious adverse events, respectively) and a significantly higher rate of multiorgan failure during the entire study (31 vs 17 events; 0.9 [95% CI, 0.6-1.2] vs 0.5 [95% CI, 0.3-0.8] events per 100 person-years; P = .04). Although the overall incidence of vaccine-related serious adverse events (1 in each group) and the all-cause mortality rate (201/3958 vs 177/3967; 5.7 [95% CI, 4.9-6.5] vs 5.0 [95% CI, 4.3-5.7] deaths per 100 person-years; P = .20) were not statistically different between groups, the mortality rate in patients with staphylococcal infections was significantly higher among V710 vaccine than placebo recipients (15/73 vs 4/96; 23.0 [95% CI, 12.9-37.9] vs 4.2 [95% CI, 1.2-10.8] per 100 person-years; difference, 18.8 [95% CI, 8.0-34.1] per 100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery with median sternotomy, the use of a vaccine against S. aureus compared with placebo did not reduce the rate of serious postoperative S. aureus infections and was associated with increased mortality among patients who developed S. aureus infections. These findings do not support the use of the V710 vaccine for patients undergoing surgical interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00518687.

Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of NDV-3A against Staphylococcus aureus colonization: A phase 2 vaccine trial among US Army Infantry trainees.

BACKGROUND: Military trainees are at increased risk for Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection. Disease prevention strategies are needed, but a S. aureus vaccine does not currently exist. METHODS: We enrolled US Army Infantry trainees (Fort Benning, GA) in a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of NDV-3A, a vaccine containing a recombinant adhesin/invasion protein of Candida albicans that has structural similarity to the S. aureus protein clumping factor A. Study participants received one intramuscular dose of NDV-3A or placebo (adjuvant alone) within 72 h of arrival on base. Longitudinal nasal and oral (throat) swabs were collected throughout the 14-week Infantry training cycle. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of NDV-3A against S. aureus nasal / oral acquisition were the endpoints. RESULTS: The NDV-3A candidate had minimal reactogenicity and elicited robust antigen-specific B- and T-cell responses. During the 56-day post-vaccination period, there was no difference in the incidence of S. aureus nasal acquisition between those who were randomized to receive NDV-3A vs. placebo (25.6% vs. 29.1%; vaccine efficacy [VE]: 12.1%; p = 0.31). In time-to-event analysis, there was no difference between study groups with respect to the S. aureus colonization-free interval (VE: 13%; p = 0.29). Similarly, the efficacy of NDV-3A against S. aureus oral acquisition was poor (VE: 2.4%; p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of NDV-3A did not prevent nasal nor oral acquisition of S. aureus in a population of military trainees at high risk for colonization.

Evasion of Immunological Memory by S. aureus Infection: Implications for Vaccine Design.

Recurrent S. aureus infections are common, suggesting that natural immune responses are not protective. All candidate vaccines tested thus far have failed to protect against S. aureus infections, highlighting an urgent need to better understand the mechanisms by which the bacterium interacts with the host immune system to evade or prevent protective immunity. Although there is evidence in murine models that both cellular and humoral immune responses are important for protection against S. aureus, human studies suggest that T cells are critical in determining susceptibility to infection. This review will use an "anatomic" approach to systematically outline the steps necessary in generating a T cell-mediated immune response against S. aureus. Through the processes of bacterial uptake by antigen presenting cells, processing and presentation of antigens to T cells, and differentiation and proliferation of memory and effector T cell subsets, the ability of S. aureus to evade or inhibit each step of the T-cell mediated response will be reviewed. We hypothesize that these interactions result in the redirection of immune responses away from protective antigens, thereby precluding the establishment of "natural" memory and potentially inhibiting the efficacy of vaccination. It is anticipated that this approach will reveal important implications for future design of vaccines to prevent these infections.

Safety of Staphylococcus aureus four-antigen and three-antigen vaccines in healthy adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: Two new Staphylococcus aureus vaccines, S. aureus four-antigen (SA4Ag) and three-antigen (SA3Ag) vaccines, have good immunogenicity and tolerance. However, the safety of these vaccines is worth exploring. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety of SA3Ag and SA4Ag by evaluating systemic and local adverse events. METHODS: The Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized clinical trials confirming the safety of SA4Ag and SA3Ag. Two investigators independently selected suitable trials, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. RESULTS: Three studies comprising a total of 1,148 participants were included in this review. The two S. aureus vaccines did not increase systemic adverse events (relative ratio 1.1 [95% confidence interval 0.98, 1.24]), but increased the incidence of local adverse events (2.89 [2.15, 3.90]). However, the incidence of severe local adverse events (4.06 [0.78, 21.24]) did not rise significantly. CONCLUSIONS: SA4Ag and SA3Ag have acceptable safety in adults.

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a single dose 4-antigen or 3-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine in healthy older adults: Results of a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The decline in immune function with age is a challenge to vaccine development. Following an initial study in adults aged 18-64years, this study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) 4-antigen (SA4Ag) and 3-antigen (SA3Ag) vaccine in older adults. SA3Ag included capsular polysaccharide serotypes 5 and 8 (CP5 and CP8) conjugated to the nontoxic mutant form of diphtheria toxin (CRM197) and a recombinant version of clumping factor A (ClfA). SA4Ag included these antigens, with the addition of a recombinant manganese transporter C (rP305A or MntC). Both vaccines were unadjuvanted. METHODS: In this double-blind, sponsor-unblinded, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 study, 284 healthy adults (aged 65-85years) were randomised to receive a single dose of one of three formulations of SA4Ag with escalating dose levels of rP305A, SA3Ag, or placebo. Functional immune responses were measured using opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) killing and fibrinogen-binding inhibition (FBI) assays; immunogenicity was also assessed using a competitive Luminex® immunoassay (cLIA). T-cell responses were measured in a small subgroup of subjects using intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays. RESULTS: The results demonstrated rapid and robust functional immune responses to all antigens in healthy older adults. A high proportion of active vaccine recipients met the pre-defined antibody thresholds for each antigen at Day 29. SA4Ag elicited a dose-level response to rP305A with up to a 13-fold rise in cLIA titres at Day 29. Opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) assays showed >50- and >20-fold rises in functional titres using S. aureus strains expressing CP5 and CP8, respectively, at Day 29. T-cell cytokine responses were not substantially above background levels. There were no safety concerns in this study population and no increases in adverse events with higher rP305A dose levels. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose vaccination of SA4Ag and SA3Ag in healthy adults aged 65-85years safely induced rapid and robust functional immune responses, supporting further development of SA4Ag for the prevention of S. aureus disease in adults up to age 85years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01643941.

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 4-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA4Ag): Results from a first-in-human randomised, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 study.

BACKGROUND: A prophylactic Staphylococcus aureus four-antigen vaccine (SA4Ag) is under development for prevention of invasive S. aureus disease. A preliminary S. aureus three-antigen vaccine (SA3Ag) was reformulated to include a novel manganese transporter protein (MntC or rP305A). This study describes the first-in-human dose-finding, safety, and immunogenicity results for SA4Ag. METHODS: In this double-blind, sponsor-unblind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 study, 454 healthy adults aged 18-64years were randomised to receive a single dose of one of three formulations of SA4Ag with escalating dose levels of rP305A or placebo. Functional immune responses were measured using opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) killing and fibrinogen-binding inhibition (FBI) assays; antigen-specific immunogenicity was assessed using a four-plex competitive Luminex® immunoassay (cLIA). RESULTS: A high proportion of SA4Ag recipients met the pre-defined antibody thresholds for each antigen at Day 29. A substantial and dose-level dependent immune response was observed for rP305A, with up to 18-fold rises in cLIA titres at Day 29. Robust functional responses were demonstrated, with >80-fold and >20-fold rises in OPA assay titres at Day 29 using S. aureus strains expressing capsular polysaccharide serotypes 5 and 8, respectively. Durable antibody responses were observed through month 12, gradually waning from peak levels achieved by days 11-15. SA4Ag was well tolerated, and no vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose vaccination of SA4Ag in healthy adults aged 18-64years safely induced rapid and robust functional immune responses that were durable through month 12, supporting further development of this vaccine. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01364571.

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant Staphylococcus aureus α-toxoid and a recombinant Panton-Valentine leukocidin subunit, in healthy adults.

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study in healthy adults to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of recombinant Staphylococcus aureus candidate vaccine antigens, recombinant α-toxoid (rAT) and a sub-unit of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (rLukS-PV). 176 subjects were enrolled and randomized within 1 of 11 treatment cohorts: monovalent rAT or rLukS-PV dosages of 10, 25, 50, and 100 µg; bivalent rAT:rLukS dosages of 10:10, 25:25, and 50:50 µg; and alum or saline placebo. All subjects were assessed at Days 0, 7, 14, 28, and 84. Subjects in the 50:50 µg bivalent cohort received a second injection on Day 84 and were assessed on Days 98 and 112. Incidence and severity of reactogenicity and adverse events (AEs) were compared. Geometric mean serum concentrations (GMC) and neutralizing activity of anti-rAT and anti-rLukS-PV IgG were assessed. Reactogenicity incidence was significantly higher in vaccine than placebo recipients (77% versus 55%, respectively; p = 0.006). However, 77% of reactogenicity events were mild and 19% were moderate in severity. The AE incidence and severity were similar between the cohorts. All monovalent and bivalent rAT dosages resulted in a significant increase in the anti-rAT IgG and anti- rLukS-PV GMCs between day 0 and 28 compared with placebo, and persisted through Day 84. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested a higher GMC and neutralizing antibody titers for the 50 µg monovalent or bivalent rAT and rLukS-PV dose as compared to the other doses. No booster effect was observed after administration of the second dose. We conclude that the rAT and rLukS-PV vaccine formulations were well-tolerated and had a favorable immunogenicity profile, producing antibody with neutralizing activity through day 84. There was no benefit observed with a booster dose of the vaccine.

Protein A-independent tumoricidal responses in dogs after extracorporeal perfusion of plasma over Staphylococcus aureus.

Protein A-positive or -negative Staphylococcus aureus preparations were used in an extracorporeal system to treat dogs with spontaneously occurring cancers. Tumor regression was seen in 4 of 7 dogs treated by reinfusion of plasma that had been incubated with protein A-positive S. aureus Cowan I strain (SAC). Therapy was associated with fever, liver enzyme abnormalities, and hypocomplementemia. Tumor response and toxicity could be diminished by more extensive washing of the SAC preparation. Tumor regression was also seen in 2 of 2 animals treated with protein A-negative S. aureus Wood strain 46. In addition, tumors regressed in 3 of 4 dogs treated with infusions of protein A-free saline extracts from S. aureus. These results suggest that the release of a non-protein A bacterial product contributes to tumor regression following incubation of plasma with S. aureus.

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Parenterally Administered, Structure-Based Rationally Modified Recombinant Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B Protein Vaccine, STEBVax.

Staphylococcus aureus produces several enterotoxins and superantigens, exposure to which can elicit profound toxic shock. A recombinant staphylococcal enterotoxin B (rSEB) containing 3 distinct mutations in the major histocompatibility complex class II binding site was combined with an alum adjuvant (Alhydrogel) and used as a potential parenteral vaccine named STEBVax. Consenting healthy adult volunteers (age range, 23 to 38 years) participated in a first-in-human open-label dose escalation study of parenteral doses of STEBVax ranging from 0.01 µg up to 20 µg. Safety was assessed by determination of the frequency of adverse events and reactogenicity. Immune responses to the vaccination were determined by measurement of anti-staphylococcal enterotoxin B (anti-SEB) IgG by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a toxin neutralization assay (TNA). Twenty-eight participants were enrolled in 7 dosing cohorts. All doses were well tolerated. The participants exhibited heterogeneous baseline antibody titers. More seroconversions and a faster onset of serum anti-SEB IgG toxin-neutralizing antibodies were observed by TNA with increasing doses of STEBVax. There was a trend for a plateau in antibody responses with doses of STEBVax of between 2.5 and 20 µg. Among the participants vaccinated with 2.5 µg to 20 µg of STEBVax, ∼93% seroconverted for SEB toxin-neutralizing antibody. A strong correlation between individual SEB-specific serum IgG antibody titers and the neutralization of gamma interferon production was found in vitro STEBvax appeared to be safe and immunogenic, inducing functional toxin-neutralizing antibodies. These data support its continued clinical development. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00974935.).

A randomized phase I study of the safety and immunogenicity of three ascending dose levels of a 3-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA3Ag) in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of healthcare-acquired morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare resource utilization. A prophylactic vaccine is being developed that may reduce this disease burden. METHODS: Volunteers in good general health aged 50-85 (n=312) and 18-24 (n=96) years were randomized to receive a single intramuscular dose of one of three dose levels of a non-adjuvanted, 3-antigen S. aureus vaccine (SA3Ag) or placebo. SA3Ag antigens included capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 (CP5 and CP8), each conjugated to cross-reactive material 197 (CRM197), and recombinant clumping factor A (ClfA). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were evaluated. RESULTS: At day 29 post-vaccination, robust immune responses were observed in both age cohorts at all three SA3Ag dose levels. In the primary analysis population, the 50- to 85-year age stratum, geometric mean-fold-rises in competitive Luminex(®) immunoassay antibody titers from baseline ranged from 29.2 to 83.7 (CP5), 14.1 to 31.0 (CP8), and 37.1 to 42.9 (ClfA), all (P<0.001) exceeding the pre-defined two-fold rise criteria. Similar rises in opsonophagocytic activity assay titers demonstrated functionality of the immune response. Most injection-site reactions were mild in severity and there were no substantial differences (SA3Ag vs. placebo) with regard to systemic or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of healthy adults aged 50-85 and 18-24 years, SA3Ag elicited a rapid and robust immune response and was well tolerated, with no notable safety concerns.

Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational 4-component Staphylococcus aureus vaccine with or without AS03B adjuvant: Results of a randomized phase I trial.

We assessed the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a staphylococcal vaccine combining capsular polysaccharides types 5 and 8 (CPS5/8), conjugated to tetanus toxoid (TT), with mutated detoxified α-toxin (AT) and clumping factor A (ClfA). In this phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blind trial (NCT01160172), 88 healthy 18- to 40-year-olds received CPS5-TT/CPS8-TT/AT/ClfA vaccine (5/5/10/10 µg or 10/10/30/30 µg dose, each with or without AS03B adjuvant) or saline, at months 0, 1, 6. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 d post-vaccination, respectively; potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded throughout the study. Humoral and antigen-specific CD4(+)/CD8(+) T-cell immunity were assessed from Day (D) 0 to D540 post-vaccination. The most frequently reported solicited local and general AEs were pain (78.6%-100% of subjects), fatigue (36.4%-93.3% of subjects post-dose 1-2) and headache (20%-44.4% of subjects post-dose 3). Overall, 4 SAEs and 2 potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) (none fatal or vaccine-related) were reported. For each antigen, pre-vaccination seropositivity rates were high (85.7%-100%) and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) in vaccine recipients sharply increased from D0 to D14, then plateaued to study end. Exploratory group comparisons suggested higher GMCs with higher dosage, without AS03B effect. Vaccine-induced antibodies were functional (CPS5 opsonophagocytic assays, and AT/ClfA inhibition assays). AT- and ClfA-specific CD4(+) T-cells with Th0/Th1 cytokine profile were induced at low levels (median <0.05%) by each formulation (intracellular cytokine staining). In conclusion, no safety concerns were identified and each vaccine formulation induced robust humoral immune responses after the first vaccine dose.

Efficacy profile of a bivalent Staphylococcus aureus glycoconjugated vaccine in adults on hemodialysis: Phase III randomized study.

In a previous study in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) hemodialysis patients, a single dose of Staphylococcus aureus type 5 and 8 capsular polysaccharides (T5/T8) conjugated to nontoxic recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A investigational vaccine showed no efficacy against S. aureus bacteremia 1 year post-vaccination, but a trend for efficacy was observed over the first 40 weeks post-vaccination. Vaccine efficacy (VE) of 2 vaccine doses was therefore evaluated. In a double-blind trial 3359 ESRD patients were randomized (1:1) to receive vaccine or placebo at week 0 and 35. VE in preventing S. aureus bacteremia was assessed between 3-35 weeks and 3-60 weeks post-dose-1. Anti-T5 and anti-T8 antibodies were measured. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded for 42 days post-vaccination and deaths until study end. No significant difference in the incidence of S. aureus bacteremia was observed between vaccine and placebo groups between weeks 3-35 weeks post-dose 1 (VE -23%, 95%CI: -98;23, p = 0.39) or at 3-60 weeks post-dose-1 (VE -8%, 95%CI: -57;26, p = 0.70). Day 42 geometric mean antibody concentrations were 272.4 µg/ml and 242.0 µg/ml (T5 and T8, respectively) in vaccinees. SAEs were reported by 24%/25.3% of vaccinees/placebo recipients. These data do not show a protective effect of either 1 or 2 vaccine doses against S. aureus bacteremia in ESRD patients. The vaccine induced a robust immune response and had an acceptable safety profile. Further investigation suggested possible suboptimal vaccine quality (manufacturing) and a need to expand the antigen composition of the vaccine. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00071214.

Development of a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine against mastitis in dairy cows. I. Challenge trials.

A vaccine composed of three field isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) derived from cases of mastitis in cows was developed. The vaccine was administered to nine uninfected cows while 10 other cows were used as controls. All cows were challenged with a highly virulent S. aureus strain administered into two quarters of each cow. Quarters were tested for clinical signs, secretion of S. aureus, and somatic cell count (SCC). No systemic effects were observed in any of the cows, vaccinated or control. Vaccinated cows had 70% protection from infection compared with fewer than 10% in the controls. Moreover, all quarters challenged in the vaccinated cows, regardless of whether they were successfully infected or not with S. aureus, exhibited very mild inflammatory reactions, identified by their low SCCs (<100,000).

[The reactogenicity and efficacy of a dried cell-free staphylococcal vaccine in treating chronic bronchitis]. / Reaktogennost' i éffektivnost' sukhoi beskletochnoi stafilokokkovoi vaktsiny pri lechenii khronicheskikhh bronkhitov.

The data obtained in the controlled trial of the immunotherapy of chronic bronchitis (CB) patients with lyophilized acellular staphylococcal vaccine developed at the Mechnikov Research Institute for Vaccines and Sera (USSR Acad. Med. Sci.), Moscow, are presented. The patients were divided at random into two groups; of these, one group received the vaccine and the other, placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution). The preparations were injected subcutaneously simultaneously with traditional treatment. The vaccine was well tolerated by the patients. In the blood of the patients receiving the vaccine, in contrast to those receiving placebo, a significant increase in the level of specific antibodies determined in the passive hemagglutination test and IgG was noted. When following the remote consequences of the disease for a year after the course of immunotherapy, a significant decrease in the occurrence of aggravations, an increase in the duration of remission and a decrease in the duration of sick leaves were registered. These data indicate that the immunotherapy of CB with lyophilized acellular staphylococcal vaccine is a promising method of preventing relapses.

[Postvaccinal reactions to the administration of a dried staphylococcal vaccine made from water-soluble antigens]. / Postvaktsinal'nye reaktsii na vvedenie sukhoi stafilokokkovoi vaktsiny iz vodorastvorimykh antigenov.

An unequivocal regularity in local and systemic reactions to multiple (in 5 injections) administration of lyophilized staphylococcal vaccine prepared from water-soluble antigens has been established in patients and in healthy adults: the number and intensity of reaction decreased after each subsequent injection. A similar tendency has been observed in the vaccinees who were examined for their IgE levels. These data are indicative of the desensitizing action of the vaccine.

[The efficacy and reactogenicity of a cell-free staphylococcal vaccine in the immunotherapy of patients with chronic pyodermas]. / Effektivnost' i reaktogennost' beskletochnoi stafilokokkovoi vaktsiny pri immunoterapii bol'nykh khronicheskimi piodermiiami.

The clinical effectiveness, reactogenicity and immunological activity of cell free staphylococcal vaccine in the immunotherapy of chronic pyoderma patients under the conditions of controlled trials were studied. Immunotherapy was carried out in combination with traditional methods of treatment. A group of 39 patient received cell free staphylococcal vaccine subcutaneously; the second control group (30 patients) received the commercial preparation of staphylococcal antiphagin and the third group (31 patients) was treated by traditional methods without vaccines. The study revealed that cell free staphylococcal vaccine had low reactogenicity and was well tolerated by patients; in contrast to the methods of treatment in the control groups, the vaccine stimulated an increased levels of specific antibodies and IgA in the blood of the patients. Immunotherapy with cell free staphylococcal vaccine led to clinical convalescence and remission in 1-3 years (the term of observation) in 71.8% of cases. In the two control groups such effect did not exceed 23%.