To evaluate the management adopted by orthodontists regarding root resorption caused byorthodontic treatment, relating it to their time of experience and the applicable legal norms.
Methods:
the study population consisted of 56 orthodontists from the city of Belo Horizonte(Minas Gerais State), and the tool to collect the data was a questionnaire with open and closedquestions. Data were subjected to descriptive analysis. The association between the variableswas analyzed by the chi-square test with significance level of 5%.
Results:
57.6% of professionalstemporarily interrupt the treatment; in the prevention and/or control, most professionals (80.4%)perform initial and periodical radiographs (every six months). Among the professionals with lessthan 5 years of experience as a specialist, 88.9% usually make periodic radiographic control;100% affirmed to file the documents. No significant difference was found between dentists withdifferent times of experience regarding the practice of archiving the documents (p = 0.271).Among those with 5-15 years of experience, 77.4% perform periodic radiographic control and45.2% had already detected root resorption. Among those with more than 15 years of experience,71.4% usually perform the periodic radiographic control, and 85.7% had already faced somecase of root resorption in the clinical practice.
Conclusions:
Although most orthodontists adopt acorrect management facing the occurrence, prevention and control of root resorption associatedwith orthodontic treatment, the majority are unaware about existing legislation in our country.