Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reconstruction of the mandible with osseous free flaps: a 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients.
Cordeiro, P G; Disa, J J; Hidalgo, D A; Hu, Q Y.
Afiliación
  • Cordeiro PG; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. cordeirp@mskcc.org
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 104(5): 1314-20, 1999 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10513911
ABSTRACT
Osseous free flaps have become the preferred method for reconstructing segmental mandibular defects. Of 457 head and neck free flaps, 150 osseous mandible reconstructions were performed over a 10-year period. This experience was retrospectively reviewed to establish an approach to osseous free flap mandible reconstruction. There were 94 male and 56 female patients (mean age, 50 years; range 3 to 79 years); 43 percent had hemimandibular defects, and the rest had central, lateral, or a combination defect. Donor sites included the fibula (90 percent), radius (4 percent), scapula (4 percent), and ilium (2 percent). Rigid fixation (up to five osteotomy sites) was used in 98 percent of patients. Aesthetic and functional results were evaluated a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. The free flap success rate was 100 percent, and bony union was achieved in 97 percent of the osteotomy sites. Osseointegrated dental implants were placed in 20 patients. A return to an unrestricted diet was achieved in 45 percent of patients; 45 percent returned to a soft diet, and 5 percent were on a liquid diet. Five percent of patients required enteral feeding to maintain weight. Speech was assessed as normal (36 percent), near normal (27 percent), intelligible (28 percent), or unintelligible (9 percent). Aesthetic outcome was judged as excellent (32 percent), good (27 percent), fair (27 percent), or poor (14 percent). This study demonstrates a very high success rate, with good-to-excellent functional and aesthetic results using osseous free flaps for primary mandible reconstruction. The fibula donor site should be the first choice for most cases, particularly those with anterior or large bony defects requiring multiple osteotomies. Use of alternative donor sites (i.e., radius and scapula) is best reserved for cases with large soft-tissue and minimal bone requirements. The ilium is recommended only when other options are unavailable. Thoughtful flap selection and design should supplant the need for multiple, simultaneous free flaps and vein grafting in most cases.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colgajos Quirúrgicos / Trasplante Óseo / Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica / Mandíbula Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 1999 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
Buscar en Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colgajos Quirúrgicos / Trasplante Óseo / Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica / Mandíbula Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 1999 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos