Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact on renal function of percutaneous thermal ablation of renal masses in patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease.
Wehrenberg-Klee, Eric; Clark, Timothy W I; Malkowicz, Stanley B; Soulen, Michael C; Wein, Alan J; Mondschein, Jeffrey I; Van Arsdalen, Keith; Guzzo, Thomas J; Stavropoulos, S William.
Afiliación
  • Wehrenberg-Klee E; Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 23(1): 41-5, 2012 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22019179
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To examine the effect of percutaneous thermal ablation of renal masses on renal function among patients with baseline chronic kidney disease (CKD). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Patients with baseline CKD (initial glomerular filtration rate [GFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) who underwent percutaneous cryoablation or radiofrequency (RF) ablation of renal masses were reviewed.

RESULTS:

A total of 48 patients with a GRF of 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or lower were treated with renal cryoablation or RF ablation and had follow-up GFR measurement 1 month afterward. Mean patient age was 73 years (range, 47-89 y). Cryoablation was performed in 22 patients and RF ablation was performed in 26. Mean tumor diameter was 3.4 cm (range, 0.9-10.2 cm). Mean overall GFRs were 39.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at baseline and 39.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 month after ablation (P = .85). A total of 38 patients had 1-year follow-up GFR measurement (cryoablation, n = 18; RF ablation, n = 20), and their mean GFR was 40.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ± 11.4 (SD), compared with a preablation GFR of 41.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2)(P = .79). In the cryoablation group, mean GFRs at 1 month and 1 year were 41.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 44.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2), compared with respective baseline GFRs of 41.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 42.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = .75 and P = .19, respectively). In the RF ablation group, mean GFRs at 1 month and 1 year were 38.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 37.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2), compared with respective baseline GFRs of 38.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 40.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P = .58 and P = .09, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

Independent of ablation modality, percutaneous renal mass ablation does not appear to affect renal function among patients with CKD.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renales / Ablación por Catéter / Criocirugía / Fallo Renal Crónico / Neoplasias Renales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renales / Ablación por Catéter / Criocirugía / Fallo Renal Crónico / Neoplasias Renales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos