Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Results of a cosmetovigilance survey in The Netherlands.
Salverda, Joanne G W; Bragt, Peter J C; de Wit-Bos, Lianne; Rustemeyer, Thomas; Coenraads, Pieter Jan; Tupker, Ron A; Kunkeler, Lia C M; Laheij-de Boer, Anna-Marijke; Stenveld, Harma J; van Ginkel, Cees J W; Kooi, Myrna W; Bourgeois, François C; van Gorcum, Teetske F; van Engelen, Jacqueline G M; van Dijk, Remmelt; de Graaf, Judith; Donker, Gé A; de Heer, Cees; Bruynzeel, Derk.
Afiliación
  • Salverda JG; Centre for Substances and Integrated Risk Assessment (SIR), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. joanne.salverda@rivm.nl
Contact Dermatitis ; 68(3): 139-48, 2013 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23421458
BACKGROUND: Cosmetic products contribute considerably to the incidence of contact dermatitis. In response to a resolution of the Council of Europe, the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) in The Netherlands set up a pilot project to report undesirable effects attributed to cosmetic products. OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of undesirable effects attributed to cosmetic products and to identify the ingredients involved. The information could contribute to the assessment of whether current EU legislation on cosmetics provides adequate protection. PATIENTS/METHODS: General practitioners, dermatologists and consumers in The Netherlands completed questionnaires on reported undesirable effects of cosmetics. Dermatologists also carried out patch tests and, where necessary, tests with specific batch ingredients of the associated cosmetic product. A website and a public awareness campaign were launched to encourage consumers to report undesirable effects. RESULTS: Between July 2009 and May 2011, the RIVM received more than 1600 reports. Severe undesirable effects were claimed in 1-4% of the cases. The most frequently reported cosmetic products were make-up and moisturisers, and the most frequently identified allergens were isothiazolinones and fragrance ingredients. Three patients tested positive for co-polymers/cross-polymers. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations are recommended on the prevalence of isothiazolinone-induced allergic contact dermatitis and the allergenic potential of co-polymers/cross-polymers.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto / Cosméticos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto / Cosméticos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos