Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Model-based iterative reconstruction: effect on patient radiation dose and image quality in pediatric body CT.
Smith, Ethan A; Dillman, Jonathan R; Goodsitt, Mitchell M; Christodoulou, Emmanuel G; Keshavarzi, Nahid; Strouse, Peter J.
Afiliación
  • Smith EA; From the Section of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital-University of Michigan Health System, 1540 E Hospital Dr, SPC 4252, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-4252 (E.A.S., J.R.D., P.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (M.M.G., E.G.C.); and Department of Biostatistics, Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, Ann Arbor, Mich (N.K.).
Radiology ; 270(2): 526-34, 2014 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24091359
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To retrospectively compare image quality and radiation dose between a reduced-dose computed tomographic (CT) protocol that uses model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) and a standard-dose CT protocol that uses 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) with filtered back projection. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Institutional review board approval was obtained. Clinical CT images of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis obtained with a reduced-dose protocol were identified. Images were reconstructed with two algorithms MBIR and 100% ASIR. All subjects had undergone standard-dose CT within the prior year, and the images were reconstructed with 30% ASIR. Reduced- and standard-dose images were evaluated objectively and subjectively. Reduced-dose images were evaluated for lesion detectability. Spatial resolution was assessed in a phantom. Radiation dose was estimated by using volumetric CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) and calculated size-specific dose estimates (SSDE). A combination of descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and t tests was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS:

In the 25 patients who underwent the reduced-dose protocol, mean decrease in CTDI(vol) was 46% (range, 19%-65%) and mean decrease in SSDE was 44% (range, 19%-64%). Reduced-dose MBIR images had less noise (P > .004). Spatial resolution was superior for reduced-dose MBIR images. Reduced-dose MBIR images were equivalent to standard-dose images for lungs and soft tissues (P > .05) but were inferior for bones (P = .004). Reduced-dose 100% ASIR images were inferior for soft tissues (P < .002), lungs (P < .001), and bones (P < .001). By using the same reduced-dose acquisition, lesion detectability was better (38% [32 of 84 rated lesions]) or the same (62% [52 of 84 rated lesions]) with MBIR as compared with 100% ASIR.

CONCLUSION:

CT performed with a reduced-dose protocol and MBIR is feasible in the pediatric population, and it maintains diagnostic quality.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosis de Radiación / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant Idioma: En Revista: Radiology Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosis de Radiación / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant Idioma: En Revista: Radiology Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article