Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Profile of drug administration errors in anesthesia among anesthesiologists from Santa Catarina.
Erdmann, Thomas Rolf; Garcia, Jorge Hamilton Soares; Loureiro, Marcos Lázaro; Monteiro, Marcelo Petruccelli; Brunharo, Guilherme Muriano.
Afiliación
  • Erdmann TR; Hospital Governador Celso Ramos, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. Electronic address: thomaserdmann@hotmail.com.
  • Garcia JH; Hospital Governador Celso Ramos, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
  • Loureiro ML; Hospital Governador Celso Ramos, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
  • Monteiro MP; Hospital Governador Celso Ramos, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
  • Brunharo GM; Hospital Governador Celso Ramos, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 66(1): 105-10, 2016.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26768939
INTRODUCTION: Anesthesiology is the only medical specialty that prescribes, dilutes, and administers drugs without conferral by another professional. Adding to the high frequency of drug administration, a propitious scenario to errors is created. OBJECTIVE: Access the prevalence of drug administration errors during anesthesia among anesthesiologists from Santa Catarina, the circumstances in which they occurred, and possible associated factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was sent to all anesthesiologists from Sociedade de Anestesiologia do Estado de Santa Catarina, with direct or multiple choice questions on responder demographics and anesthesia practice profile; prevalence of errors, type and consequence of error; and factors that may have contributed to the errors. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 91.8% reported they had committed administration errors, adding the total error of 274 and mean of 4.7 (6.9) errors per respondent. The most common error was replacement (68.4%), followed by dose error (49.1%), and omission (35%). Only 7% of respondents reported neuraxial administration error. Regarding circumstances of errors, they mainly occurred in the morning (32.7%), in anesthesia maintenance (49%), with 47.8% without harm to the patient and 1.75% with the highest morbidity and irreversible damage, and 87.3% of cases with immediate identification. As for possible contributing factors, the most frequent were distraction and fatigue (64.9%) and misreading of labels, ampoules, or syringes (54.4%). CONCLUSION: Most respondents committed more than one error in anesthesia administration, mainly justified as a distraction or fatigue, and of low gravity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anestesiólogos / Anestesia / Anestésicos / Errores de Medicación Tipo de estudio: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Anesthesiol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Anestesiólogos / Anestesia / Anestésicos / Errores de Medicación Tipo de estudio: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Anesthesiol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article