Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Course After Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: Chagasic Versus Ischemic Patients.
Pereira, Francisca Tatiana Moreira; Rocha, Eduardo Arrais; Monteiro, Marcelo de Paula Martins; Lima, Neiberg de Alcantara; Rodrigues Sobrinho, Carlos Roberto Martins; Pires Neto, Roberto da Justa.
Afiliación
  • Pereira FT; Setor de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
  • Rocha EA; Setor de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
  • Monteiro Mde P; Setor de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
  • Lima Nde A; Setor de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
  • Rodrigues Sobrinho CR; Setor de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
  • Pires Neto Rda J; Departamento de Saúde Comunitária, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 107(2): 99-100, 2016 Aug.
Article en En, Pt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27411097
BACKGROUND: The outcome of Chagas disease patients after receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes after ICD implantation in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) and ischemic heart disease (IHD). METHODS: Prospective study of a population of 153 patients receiving ICD (65 with CCC and 88 with IHD). The devices were implanted between 2003 and 2011. Survival rates and event-free survival were compared. RESULTS: The groups were similar regarding sex, functional class and ejection fraction. Ischemic patients were, on average, 10 years older than CCC patients (p < 0.05). Patients with CCC had lower schooling and monthly income than IHD patients (p < 0.05). The number of appropriate therapies was 2.07 higher in CCC patients, who had a greater incidence of appropriate shock (p < 0.05). Annual mortality rate and electrical storm incidence were similar in both groups. There was no sudden death in CCC patients, and only one in IHD patients. Neither survival time (p = 0.720) nor event-free survival (p = 0.143) significantly differed between the groups. CONCLUSION: CCC doubles the risk of receiving appropriate therapies as compared to IHD, showing the greater complexity of arrhythmias in Chagas patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cardiomiopatía Chagásica / Isquemia Miocárdica / Desfibriladores Implantables Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En / Pt Revista: Arq Bras Cardiol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cardiomiopatía Chagásica / Isquemia Miocárdica / Desfibriladores Implantables Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En / Pt Revista: Arq Bras Cardiol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil