Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Review and analysis of strengths and weaknesses of agro-ecosystem models for simulating C and N fluxes.
Brilli, Lorenzo; Bechini, Luca; Bindi, Marco; Carozzi, Marco; Cavalli, Daniele; Conant, Richard; Dorich, Cristopher D; Doro, Luca; Ehrhardt, Fiona; Farina, Roberta; Ferrise, Roberto; Fitton, Nuala; Francaviglia, Rosa; Grace, Peter; Iocola, Ileana; Klumpp, Katja; Léonard, Joël; Martin, Raphaël; Massad, Raia Silvia; Recous, Sylvie; Seddaiu, Giovanna; Sharp, Joanna; Smith, Pete; Smith, Ward N; Soussana, Jean-Francois; Bellocchi, Gianni.
Afiliación
  • Brilli L; Università degli Studi di Firenze, Department of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Sciences, 50144 Florence, Italy; IBIMET-CNR, Via Caproni 8, 50145 Firenze, Italy. Electronic address: lorenzo.brilli@unifi.it.
  • Bechini L; Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Milan, Italy.
  • Bindi M; Università degli Studi di Firenze, Department of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Sciences, 50144 Florence, Italy.
  • Carozzi M; INRA, AgroParisTech, UMR1402 EcoSys, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France.
  • Cavalli D; Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Milan, Italy.
  • Conant R; NREL, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
  • Dorich CD; NREL, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
  • Doro L; Desertification Research Centre, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy; Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Blackland Research & Extension Center, Temple, (TX), USA.
  • Ehrhardt F; INRA, 63039 Paris, France.
  • Farina R; CREA-RPS, Research Centre for the Soil-Plant System, Via della Navicella 2-4, 00184 Roma, Italy.
  • Ferrise R; Università degli Studi di Firenze, Department of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Sciences, 50144 Florence, Italy.
  • Fitton N; Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, St Machar Drive, AB24 3UU Aberdeen, UK.
  • Francaviglia R; CREA-RPS, Research Centre for the Soil-Plant System, Via della Navicella 2-4, 00184 Roma, Italy.
  • Grace P; Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Iocola I; Desertification Research Centre, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
  • Klumpp K; INRA, UREP, 63039 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Léonard J; INRA, UR 1158 AgroImpact, site de Laon, F-02000 Barenton-Bugny, France.
  • Martin R; INRA, UREP, 63039 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Massad RS; INRA, AgroParisTech, UMR1402 EcoSys, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France.
  • Recous S; INRA, FARE Lab, 51100 Reims, France.
  • Seddaiu G; Desertification Research Centre, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
  • Sharp J; New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research, 7608 Lincoln, New Zealand.
  • Smith P; Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, St Machar Drive, AB24 3UU Aberdeen, UK.
  • Smith WN; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada.
  • Soussana JF; INRA, 63039 Paris, France.
  • Bellocchi G; INRA, UREP, 63039 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Sci Total Environ ; 598: 445-470, 2017 Nov 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28454025
Biogeochemical simulation models are important tools for describing and quantifying the contribution of agricultural systems to C sequestration and GHG source/sink status. The abundance of simulation tools developed over recent decades, however, creates a difficulty because predictions from different models show large variability. Discrepancies between the conclusions of different modelling studies are often ascribed to differences in the physical and biogeochemical processes incorporated in equations of C and N cycles and their interactions. Here we review the literature to determine the state-of-the-art in modelling agricultural (crop and grassland) systems. In order to carry out this study, we selected the range of biogeochemical models used by the CN-MIP consortium of FACCE-JPI (http://www.faccejpi.com): APSIM, CERES-EGC, DayCent, DNDC, DSSAT, EPIC, PaSim, RothC and STICS. In our analysis, these models were assessed for the quality and comprehensiveness of underlying processes related to pedo-climatic conditions and management practices, but also with respect to time and space of application, and for their accuracy in multiple contexts. Overall, it emerged that there is a possible impact of ill-defined pedo-climatic conditions in the unsatisfactory performance of the models (46.2%), followed by limitations in the algorithms simulating the effects of management practices (33.1%). The multiplicity of scales in both time and space is a fundamental feature, which explains the remaining weaknesses (i.e. 20.7%). Innovative aspects have been identified for future development of C and N models. They include the explicit representation of soil microbial biomass to drive soil organic matter turnover, the effect of N shortage on SOM decomposition, the improvements related to the production and consumption of gases and an adequate simulations of gas transport in soil. On these bases, the assessment of trends and gaps in the modelling approaches currently employed to represent biogeochemical cycles in crop and grassland systems appears an essential step for future research.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sci Total Environ Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article