Outcomes After Cryoablation Versus Partial Nephrectomy for Sporadic Renal Tumors in a Solitary Kidney: A Propensity Score Analysis.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While partial nephrectomy (PN) is considered the standard approach for a tumor in a solitary kidney, percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) is emerging as an alternative nephron-sparing option. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between PCA and PN for tumors in a solitary kidney. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent PCA or PN between 2005 and 2015 for a single primary renal tumor in a solitary kidney were identified using Mayo Clinic Registries. Exclusion criteria were inherited tumor syndromes and salvage procedures. INTERVENTION PCA and PN. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: To achieve balance in baseline characteristics, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity to receive treatment. The risk of having a post-treatment complication and percent drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as the risks of local/ipsilateral recurrence, distant metastasis, and cancer-specific mortality, were compared between groups using logistic, linear, and Fine-and-Gray competing risk regression models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The cohort included 118 patients (PCA 54; PN 64) with a median follow-up of 47 mo (interquartile range 18, 74). In unadjusted analyses, PCA was associated with a lower risk of complications (15% vs 31%; odds ratio [OR]=0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15, 0.96; p=0.04). However, upon accounting for baseline differences with IPTW adjustment, there was no longer a significant difference in the risk of complications (28% vs 29%; OR=0.95; 95% CI 0.53, 1.69; p=0.9). There were no significant differences between PCA and PN in percentage drop in eGFR at discharge (mean 11% vs 16%; ß=-5%; 95% CI -13, 3; p=0.2) or at 3 mo (12% vs 9%; ß=3%; 95% CI -3, 10; p=0.3). Likewise, no significant differences were noted in local recurrence (HR=0.87; 95% CI 0.38, 1.98; p=0.7), distant metastases (HR=0.60; 95% CI 0.30, 1.20; p=0.2), or cancer-specific mortality (HR=1.13; 95% CI 0.32, 3.98; p=0.8). Limitations include the sample size, given the relative rarity of renal masses in solitary kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no significant difference in complications, renal function outcomes, and oncologic outcomes between PN and PCA for patients with a tumor in a solitary kidney. Validation in a larger multi-institutional analysis may be warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY: Partial nephrectomy (surgery) and percutaneous cryoablation are both options for treating a kidney tumor while preserving the normal portion of the kidney. In patients with a tumor in their only kidney, we found no difference in the risk of complications, kidney function outcomes, or cancer control outcomes between these two approaches.