Contribution of mussel fall-off from aquaculture to wild lobster Homarus americanus diets.

ABSTRACT

Anthropogenic subsidies to natural systems can influence the diet of mobile omnivore species and co-occurring species. This study assessed if fall-off from mussel aquaculture subsidized wild populations of mobile scavengers and predators, such as the commercially important lobster Homarus americanus. A Bayesian stable isotope-mixing model with parameters determined from the literature and from a 105 days laboratory feeding experiment was applied to wild lobsters to determine how important the various food sources were in these lobsters, especially mussel fall-off. Isotopic values were mainly affected by lobster size with model outputs indicating that large lobsters (>80 mm cephalothorax) fed mainly on mussels from the mussel farm (46% of the diet) while small ones fed mostly on the rock crab Cancer irroratus (99%). The contribution of mussel subsidies to the lobster's diet was thus size-specific and direct (i.e. through mussel fall-off and not through co-occurring species such as rock crab). The absence of a link between food sources and lipid energy content in lobsters suggested that the reduction of rock crab consumption would have to be more drastic to affect the general health of large lobsters in the short term.