Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sensitivity and Specificity of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Hepatitis C Virus With or Without HIV Coinfection: A Multicentre Laboratory Evaluation Study.
Vetter, Beatrice N; Reipold, Elena Ivanova; Ongarello, Stefano; Audu, Rosemary; Ige, Fehintola A; Alkhazashvili, Maia; Chitadze, Nazibrola; Vanroye, Fien; De Weggheleire, Anja; An, Sokkab; Fransen, Katrien.
Afiliación
  • Vetter BN; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Reipold EI; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Ongarello S; Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Audu R; Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
  • Ige FA; Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria.
  • Alkhazashvili M; National Center for Disease Control and Public Health/R. Lugar Center for Public Health Research, Tbilisi, Georgia.
  • Chitadze N; National Center for Disease Control and Public Health/R. Lugar Center for Public Health Research, Tbilisi, Georgia.
  • Vanroye F; Institute of Tropical Medicine HIV/STD Reference Laboratory, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • De Weggheleire A; Institute of Tropical Medicine HIV/STD Reference Laboratory, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • An S; Sihanouk Hospital Center of Hope, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Fransen K; Institute of Tropical Medicine HIV/STD Reference Laboratory, Antwerp, Belgium.
J Infect Dis ; 226(3): 420-430, 2022 08 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32614451
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening is critical to HCV elimination efforts. Simplified diagnostics are required for low-resource settings and difficult-to-reach populations. This retrospective study assessed performance of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for detection of HCV antibodies. METHODS: Two lots of 13 RDTs were evaluated at 3 laboratories using archived plasma samples from 4 countries (Nigeria, Georgia, Cambodia, and Belgium). HCV status was determined using 3 reference tests according to a composite algorithm. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected populations. Operational characteristics were also assessed. RESULTS: In total, 1710 samples met inclusion criteria. In HIV-uninfected samples (n = 384), the majority of RDTs had sensitivity ≥98% in 1 or both lots and most RDTs had specificity ≥99%. In HIV-infected samples (n = 264), specificity remained high but sensitivity was markedly lower than in HIV-uninfected samples; only 1 RDT reached >95%. The majority of HIV-infected samples for which sensitivity was low did not have detectable HCV viral load/core antigen. Interreader variability, lot-to-lot variability, and rate of invalid runs were low for all RDTs (<2%). CONCLUSIONS: HCV RDTs should be evaluated in the intended target population, as sensitivity can be impacted by population factors such as HIV status. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04033887.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por VIH / Hepatitis C Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Infect Dis Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por VIH / Hepatitis C Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Infect Dis Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza