Sensitivity and Specificity of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Hepatitis C Virus With or Without HIV Coinfection: A Multicentre Laboratory Evaluation Study.
J Infect Dis
; 226(3): 420-430, 2022 08 26.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32614451
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening is critical to HCV elimination efforts. Simplified diagnostics are required for low-resource settings and difficult-to-reach populations. This retrospective study assessed performance of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for detection of HCV antibodies. METHODS: Two lots of 13 RDTs were evaluated at 3 laboratories using archived plasma samples from 4 countries (Nigeria, Georgia, Cambodia, and Belgium). HCV status was determined using 3 reference tests according to a composite algorithm. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected populations. Operational characteristics were also assessed. RESULTS: In total, 1710 samples met inclusion criteria. In HIV-uninfected samples (nâ
=â
384), the majority of RDTs had sensitivity ≥98% in 1 or both lots and most RDTs had specificity ≥99%. In HIV-infected samples (nâ
=â
264), specificity remained high but sensitivity was markedly lower than in HIV-uninfected samples; only 1 RDT reached >95%. The majority of HIV-infected samples for which sensitivity was low did not have detectable HCV viral load/core antigen. Interreader variability, lot-to-lot variability, and rate of invalid runs were low for all RDTs (<2%). CONCLUSIONS: HCV RDTs should be evaluated in the intended target population, as sensitivity can be impacted by population factors such as HIV status. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04033887.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Infecciones por VIH
/
Hepatitis C
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Observational_studies
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Infect Dis
Año:
2022
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Suiza