Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Instruments of health and harm: how the procurement of healthcare goods contributes to global health inequality.
Trueba, Mei L; Bhutta, Mahmood F; Shahvisi, Arianne.
Afiliación
  • Trueba ML; Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK m.trueba@bsms.ac.uk.
  • Bhutta MF; Department of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT), Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.
  • Shahvisi A; Ethics, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
J Med Ethics ; 2020 Aug 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32839230
Many healthcare goods, such as surgical instruments, textiles and gloves, are manufactured in unregulated factories and sweatshops where, amongst other labour rights violations, workers are subject to considerable occupational health risks. In this paper we undertake an ethical analysis of the supply of sweatshop-produced surgical goods to healthcare providers, with a specific focus on the National Health Service of the United Kingdom. We contend that while labour abuses and occupational health deficiencies are morally unacceptable in the production of any commodity, an additional wrong is incurred when the health of certain populations is secured in ways that endanger the health and well-being of people working and living elsewhere. While some measures have been taken to better regulate the supply chain to healthcare providers in the UK, further action is needed to ensure that surgical goods are sourced from suppliers who protect the labour and occupational health rights of their workers.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Med Ethics Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Med Ethics Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article