Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mechanical extraction of cardiac implantable electronic devices leads with long dwell time: Efficacy and safety of the step up approach.
Lensvelt, Leontine M H; Egorova, Anastasia D; Schalij, Martin J; Yilmaz, Dilek; Kennergren, Charles; Bootsma, Marianne; van Erven, Lieselot.
Afiliación
  • Lensvelt LMH; Department of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Egorova AD; Department of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Schalij MJ; Department of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Yilmaz D; Department of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Kennergren C; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden.
  • Bootsma M; Department of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van Erven L; Department of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 44(1): 120-128, 2021 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33067867
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the stepwise mechanical transvenous lead extraction approach in a patient population with chronically implanted transvenous leads with a long dwell time. From January 2014 till December 2018, all lead extractions with lead dwell time ≥5 years performed at our tertiary centre were retrospectively analysed. A total of 173 leads, from 78 patients (median age 68 years; 81% male) with a median dwell time of 9 years (interquartile range [IQR] 5) were extracted, with three or more leads in 42% of the patients. Right atrial leads 41%; right ventricular pacing leads 16%; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads 31% (72% dual coil); coronary sinus leads 12%. The majority (75%) of the leads had an active fixation. Most frequent indication for extraction was pocket infection/erosion (76%). Overall clinical success was 97%, and complete procedural success was 93%. Venous patency, assessed with venous angiography, was well preserved in 93% of the cases. The overall procedural complication rate was 3.8% (2.6% major and 1.3% minor). Despite the complexity of the population and a very long dwell time (median 9 years), a clinical success rate of 97% was achieved with the stepwise mechanical approach. Analysis of impeding progression of pectoral extraction suggests that dense fibrosis and sharp lead curvature in the transvenous trajectory pose a challenge. Complication rate was low, and acute venous patency was generally well preserved.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Remoción de Dispositivos / Electrodos Implantados Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Remoción de Dispositivos / Electrodos Implantados Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos