Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Enteral Protein Amount on Growth and Health Outcomes in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Preterm Infants: Phase II of the Pre-B Project and an Evidence Analysis Center Systematic Review.
Fenton, Tanis R; Groh-Wargo, Sharon; Gura, Kathleen; Martin, Camilia R; Taylor, Sarah N; Griffin, Ian J; Rozga, Mary; Moloney, Lisa.
Afiliación
  • Fenton TR; Community Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Canada Nutrition Services, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Groh-Wargo S; Departments of Nutrition and Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
  • Gura K; Clinical Research Program, Department of Pharmacy, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Martin CR; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neonatology, Division of Translational Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Taylor SN; Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Griffin IJ; Clinical and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Institute of New Jersey, Cedar Knolls, NJ; Department of Pediatrics, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ.
  • Rozga M; Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Evidence Analysis Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Moloney L; Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Evidence Analysis Center, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: lmoloney@eatright.org.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 121(11): 2287-2300.e12, 2021 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358688
ABSTRACT
Adequate protein intake by very-low-birth-weight preterm infants (≤1,500 g at birth) is essential to optimize growth and development. The estimated needs for this population are the highest of all humans, however, the recommended intake has varied greatly over the past several years. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane Central databases to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of prescribed protein intake and identified outcomes. Articles were screened by 2 reviewers, risk of bias was assessed, data were synthesized quantitatively and narratively, and each outcome was separately graded for certainty of evidence. The literature search retrieved 25,384 articles and 2 trials were included in final analysis. No trials were identified that evaluated effect of protein amount on morbidities or mortality. Moderate certainty evidence found a significant difference in weight gain when protein intake of greater than 3.5 g/kg/day from preterm infant formula was compared with lower intakes. Low-certainty evidence found no evidence of effect of protein intake of 2.6 vs 3.1 vs 3.8 g/kg/day on length, head circumference, skinfold measurements, or mid-arm circumference. Low-certainty evidence found some improvement in development measures when higher protein intake of 3.8 vs 3.1 vs 2.6 g/kg/day were compared. Low-certainty evidence found no significant difference in bone mineral content when these protein intakes were compared. No studies were identified that compared protein intake greater than 4.0 g/kg/day. This systematic review found that protein intake between 3.5 and 4.0 g/kg/day promotes weight gain and improved development.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recien Nacido Prematuro / Proteínas en la Dieta / Nutrición Enteral / Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso / Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: J Acad Nutr Diet Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recien Nacido Prematuro / Proteínas en la Dieta / Nutrición Enteral / Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso / Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: J Acad Nutr Diet Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá