Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sinogram-based deep learning image reconstruction technique in abdominal CT: image quality considerations.
Parakh, Anushri; Cao, Jinjin; Pierce, Theodore T; Blake, Michael A; Savage, Cristy A; Kambadakone, Avinash R.
Afiliación
  • Parakh A; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Cao J; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Pierce TT; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Blake MA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Savage CA; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Kambadakone AR; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, White 270, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. akambadakone@mgh.harvard.edu.
Eur Radiol ; 31(11): 8342-8353, 2021 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33893535
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the image quality and perception of a sinogram-based deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm for single-energy abdominal CT compared to standard-of-care strength of ASIR-V. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 50 patients (62% F; 56.74 ± 17.05 years) underwent portal venous phase. Four reconstructions (ASIR-V at 40%, and DLIR at three strengths: low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H)) were generated. Qualitative and quantitative image quality analysis was performed on the 200 image datasets. Qualitative scores were obtained for image noise, contrast, small structure visibility, sharpness, and artifact by three blinded radiologists on a 5-point scale (1, excellent; 5, very poor). Radiologists also indicated image preference on a 3-point scale (1, most preferred; 3, least preferred). Quantitative assessment was performed by measuring image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). RESULTS: DLIR had better image quality scores compared to ASIR-V. Scores on DLIR-H for noise (1.40 ± 0.53), contrast (1.41 ± 0.55), small structure visibility (1.51 ± 0.61), and sharpness (1.60 ± 0.54) were the best (p < 0.05) followed by DLIR-M (1.85 ± 0.52, 1.66 ± 0.57, 1.69 ± 0.59, 1.68 ± 0.46), DLIR-L (2.29 ± 0.58, 1.96 ± 0.61, 1.90 ± 0.65, 1.86 ± 0.46), and ASIR-V (2.86 ± 0.67, 2.55 ± 0.58, 2.34 ± 0.66, 2.01 ± 0.36). Ratings for artifacts were similar for all reconstructions (p > 0.05). DLIRs did not influence subjective textural perceptions and were preferred over ASIR-V from the beginning. All DLIRs had a higher CNR (26.38-102.30%) and lower noise (20.64-48.77%) than ASIR-V. DLIR-H had the best objective scores. CONCLUSION: Sinogram-based deep learning image reconstructions were preferred over iterative reconstruction subjectively and objectively due to improved image quality and lower noise, even in large patients. Use in clinical routine may allow for radiation dose reduction. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning image reconstructions (DLIRs) have a higher contrast-to-noise ratio compared to medium-strength hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques. • DLIR may be advantageous in patients with large body habitus due to a lower image noise. • DLIR can enable further optimization of radiation doses used in abdominal CT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aprendizaje Profundo Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aprendizaje Profundo Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos