Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-risk bariatric candidates: does red-flagging predict the post-operative course?
Dirks, Rebecca C; Athanasiadis, Dimitrios I; Hilgendorf, William A; Ziegler, Kathryn M; Waldrop, Caitlyn; Embry, Marisa; Selzer, Don J.
Afiliación
  • Dirks RC; Department of Surgery, University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA. rcdirks@iu.edu.
  • Athanasiadis DI; Department of Surgery, University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA.
  • Hilgendorf WA; Indiana University Health North Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Ziegler KM; Department of Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, USA.
  • Waldrop C; Department of Surgery, University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA.
  • Embry M; Department of Surgery, University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA.
  • Selzer DJ; Department of Surgery, University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 36(4): 2591-2599, 2022 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33987766
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Standards for preoperative bariatric patient selection include a thorough psychological evaluation. Using patients "red-flagged" during preoperative evaluations, this study aims to identify trends in long-term follow-up and complications to further optimize bariatric patient selection.

METHODS:

A multidisciplinary team held a case review conference (CRC) to discuss red-flagged patients. A retrospective chart review compared CRC patients to control patients who underwent bariatric surgery in the same interval. Patients under 18 years old, undergoing revisional bariatric surgery, or getting band placement were excluded. High-risk characteristics causing CRC inclusion, preoperative demographics, percent follow-up and other postoperative outcomes were collected up to 5 years postoperatively. If univariate analysis revealed a significant difference between cohorts, multivariable analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

Two hundred and fifty three patients were red-flagged from 2012 to 2013, of which 79 underwent surgery. After excluding 21 revisions, 3 non-adult patients, and 6 band patients, 55 red-flagged patients were analyzed in addition to 273 control patients. Patient age, sex, initial BMI, ASA, and co-morbidities were similar between groups, though flagged patients underwent RYGB more frequently than control patients. Notably, percent excess BMI loss and percent follow-up (6 months-5 years) were similar. In multivariable analysis, minor complications were more common in flagged patients; and marginal ulcers, endoscopy, and dilation for stenosis were more common in flagged versus control patients who underwent RYGB. Perforation, reoperation, revision, incisional hernia, and internal hernia were statistically similar in both groups, though reoperation was significantly more common in patients with multiple reasons to be flagged compared to controls.

CONCLUSION:

Bariatric patients deemed high risk for various psychosocial issues have similar follow-up, BMI loss, and major complications compared to controls. High-risk RYGB patients have greater minor complications, warranting additional counseling of high-risk patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica / Laparoscopía / Cirugía Bariátrica Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica / Laparoscopía / Cirugía Bariátrica Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos