Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Relevance of chemotherapy and margin status in colorectal liver metastasis.
She, Wong Hoi; Cheung, Tan To; Ma, Ka Wing; Tsang, Simon H Y; Dai, Wing Chiu; Chan, Albert C Y; Lo, Chung Mau.
Afiliación
  • She WH; Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, China.
  • Cheung TT; Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, China. tantocheung@hotmail.com.
  • Ma KW; Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, China.
  • Tsang SHY; Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, China.
  • Dai WC; Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, China.
  • Chan ACY; Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, China.
  • Lo CM; Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, China.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 406(8): 2725-2737, 2021 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34023941
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This retrospective, single-center study aimed to investigate the importance of chemotherapy and to come up with the optimal liver resection margin length for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM).

METHODS:

Patients who had undergone any form of liver resection for CRLM were reviewed and analyzed. The analyses were broken down into three parts (1) overall effect of chemotherapy, (2) effect of chemotherapy with positive/negative resection margin, and (3) result of discriminative analysis with optimal margin length analysis.

RESULTS:

In total, 381 patients were studied. Among them, 279 received chemotherapy whereas 102 did not. Survival was significantly better in patients with chemotherapy (5-year, 43.6% vs. 25.8%) (p < 0.001). Patients who received chemotherapy (n = 93) with negative margins had better survival than patients (n = 8) with positive margins (5-year, 28.1% vs. 0%) (p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis, margin involvement was the poor prognostic factor for survival. Patients who had chemotherapy (n = 238) with negative margin showed a trend of better survival than patients (n = 41) with positive margins (5-year, 45.7% vs. 29.3%) (p = 0.085). Patients (n = 93) with negative margin and no chemotherapy and patients (n = 41) with positive margin and chemotherapy had comparable survival at 5 years (p = 0.422). On multivariate analysis, tumor number was the prognostic factor for survival. By the discriminant method, 1.09 cm (sensitivity 0.242, specificity 0.718) was determined as the cut-off for optimal margin length. Patients who had margin ≥ 1.09 cm (n = 81) enjoyed significantly better survival (5-year, 54.3% vs. 33.5%) (p = 0.041). On multivariate analysis, margin length ≥ 1.09 cm was the prognostic factor for favorable survival.

CONCLUSION:

The results demonstrated the important effect of perioperative chemotherapy and negative margin liver resection in management of patients suffered from CRLM.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Langenbecks Arch Surg Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Langenbecks Arch Surg Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China