Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Haploidentical Transplant: Multicenter Experience From the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant.
Bailén, Rebeca; Vicario, José Luis; Solán, Laura; Sánchez-Vadillo, Irene; Herrera, Pilar; Calbacho, María; Alenda, Raquel; López-Lorenzo, José Luis; Humala, Karem; Chinea, Anabelle; Sánchez-Pina, José; Balas, Antonio; Moreno, Miguel Ángel; Arzuaga, Javier; Pradillo, Virginia; Dorado, Nieves; Oarbeascoa, Gillen; Anguita, Javier; Díez-Martín, José Luis; Kwon, Mi.
Afiliación
  • Bailén R; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Vicario JL; Translational Oncology Section, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
  • Solán L; Department of Histocompatibility, Centro de Transfusión de la Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sánchez-Vadillo I; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Herrera P; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Calbacho M; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
  • Alenda R; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
  • López-Lorenzo JL; Department of Histocompatibility, Centro de Transfusión de la Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Humala K; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Chinea A; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Sánchez-Pina J; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
  • Balas A; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
  • Moreno MÁ; Department of Histocompatibility, Centro de Transfusión de la Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Arzuaga J; Department of Histocompatibility, Centro de Transfusión de la Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Pradillo V; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Dorado N; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Oarbeascoa G; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Anguita J; Translational Oncology Section, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
  • Díez-Martín JL; Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Kwon M; Translational Oncology Section, Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Front Immunol ; 12: 674658, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34093576
ABSTRACT

Background:

Donor specific antibodies (DSAs) can be responsible for graft failure (GF) in the setting of mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of our study is to report the experience of the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GMTH) in patients with DSAs undergoing haplo-HSCT.

Methods:

Patients undergoing haplo-HSCT in centers from the GMTH from 2012 to 2020 were included in the study. DSAs were analyzed with a solid-phase single-antigen immunoassay; monitoring was performed during desensitization on days -14, -7, 0 and in a weekly basis until neutrophil engraftment. Desensitization strategies varied depending on center experience, immunofluorescence intensity, complement fixation and type of antibodies.

Results:

We identified a total of 20 haplo-HSCT in 19 patients performed with DSAs in 5 centers. 10 (53%) patients presented anti-HLA class I DSAs (6 of them with > 5000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)), 4 (21%) presented anti-HLA class II (1 with > 5000 MFI) and 5 (26%) presented both anti-HLA class I and II (5 with > 5000 MFI). 90% of patients received at least two treatments as desensitization strategy and all experienced a decrease of MFI after desensitization (mean reduction 74%). Only one patient who developed progressive increase of MFI after infusion developed GF. Desensitization treatments used included rituximab, immunoglobulins, therapeutic plasma exchange, incompatible platelets, buffy coat and immunosuppressors. Seventeen (90%) patients achieved neutrophil engraftment; one patient died before engraftment because of infection and one patient with class I DSAs developed primary GF despite an intensive desensitization. After a median follow-up of 10 months, OS and EFS were 60% and 58%, respectively, cumulative incidence of relapse was 5% and NRM was 32%.

Conclusions:

Despite the optimal strategy of DSAs desensitization remains unclear, the use of desensitization treatment guided by DSAs intensity kinetics constitute an effective approach with high rates of engraftment for patients with DSAs in need for an haplo-HSCT lacking an alternative suitable donor.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplantes / Trasplante Haploidéntico / Rechazo de Injerto Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Front Immunol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplantes / Trasplante Haploidéntico / Rechazo de Injerto Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Front Immunol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España