Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers to utilisation of cancer rehabilitation from the expert's view: A cross-sectional survey.
Maiwald, Phillip; Weis, Joachim; Kurlemann, Ulrich; Dresch, Carolin; Rademaker, Anna Lena; Valentini, Jan; Joos, Stefanie; Heidt, Vitali; Bartsch, Hans Helge.
Afiliación
  • Maiwald P; Tumor Biology Center, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Weis J; Section of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Kurlemann U; Tumor Biology Center, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Dresch C; Endowment Professorship for Self-Help Research, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Rademaker AL; German Professional Association for Social Work in Health Care e.V. (DVSG), Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
  • Valentini J; Tumor Biology Center, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Joos S; Research Methods Department, University of Education Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Heidt V; Faculty of Social Sciences, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences (FH Bielefeld), German Professional Association for Social Work in Health Care e.V. (DVSG), Bielefeld, Germany.
  • Bartsch HH; Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 31(1): e13522, 2022 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34637572
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The goal of this study was to investigate barriers to utilisation of cancer rehabilitation by querying a large sample of various professionals in health care with a comprehensive set of barriers.

METHODS:

We developed a questionnaire comprising 55 barriers to utilisation of cancer rehabilitation and administered it to four different types of medical, care and social work experts involved in the referral to cancer rehabilitation. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted and the extracted factors were ranked by mean values. Additionally, ANOVAs were calculated to test for group differences.

RESULTS:

Our sample (N = 606) consisted of 249 physicians, 194 social workers, 105 nurses and 55 psychologists in Germany. We identified seven barrier-dimensions low appreciation of rehabilitation by professionals, insufficient coordination, insufficient application procedure, rehabilitation requirements not met, patients' unfulfilled demands, patients' social responsibilities and patients' coping style, with the latter being rated as the most obstructive thereof. Furthermore, we found statistically significant group differences for six of these factors with small- to medium-sized effects.

CONCLUSION:

Our results support previous publications implicating the patients' coping style as a barrier. We furthermore found evidence for barriers relating to processes and organisational issues, thereby expanding on the scope of patient-oriented publications. Suggestions for improving patients' health services accessibility are made.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania