Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Using the da Vinci S, Si, X, and Xi Robotic Platforms for BABA Robotic Thyroidectomy.
Shin, Hye Rim; Lee, Keunchul; Yu, Hyeong Won; Kim, Su-Jin; Chai, Young Jun; Choi, June Young; Lee, Kyu Eun.
Afiliación
  • Shin HR; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620, Korea.
  • Lee K; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620, Korea.
  • Yu HW; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620, Korea.
  • Kim SJ; Department of Surgery, Seoul National College of Medicine and University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
  • Chai YJ; Boramae Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul 07061, Korea.
  • Choi JY; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620, Korea.
  • Lee KE; Department of Surgery, Seoul National College of Medicine and University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(10)2021 Oct 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34684167
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

Robotic thyroidectomy via the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA), first introduced in Korea in 2008, has become a standard method of thyroid removal worldwide. The introduction of robotic surgical systems has enabled more patients to benefit from BABA robotic thyroidectomy, with good postoperative and excellent cosmetic results. To date, no studies have compared the benefits of the four currently available da Vinci robotic systems (S, Si, X, and Xi) for BABA robotic thyroidectomy. To determine the da Vinci model most suitable for BABA robotic thyroidectomy, the present study compared the perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent BABA robotic thyroidectomy using the four da Vinci models. Materials and

Methods:

This retrospective study evaluated outcomes in patients (n = 750) who underwent BABA robotic thyroidectomy using the four da Vinci systems from 2013 to 2019. The clinicopathologic data, including operation time, were compared. Substudy A compared the da Vinci models S and Si from 2013 to 2017, and substudy B compared models Si, X, and Xi from 2018 to 2019.

Results:

Substudy A, comparing the da Vinci S and Si systems, found no statistically significant differences between the two groups, whereas substudy B found that operation time was shorter in patients who underwent BABA robotic thyroidectomy with the da Vinci Xi system than with the Si and X systems.

Conclusions:

The da Vinci model Xi system can benefit patients undergoing BABA robotic thyroidectomy by shortening the operation time.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Robótica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Medicina (Kaunas) Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Robótica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Medicina (Kaunas) Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article