Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in adults with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.
Potnis, Kunal C; Di, Mengyang; Isufi, Iris; Gowda, Lohith; Seropian, Stuart E; Foss, Francine M; Forman, Howard P; Huntington, Scott F.
Afiliación
  • Potnis KC; Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
  • Di M; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
  • Isufi I; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
  • Gowda L; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
  • Seropian SE; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
  • Foss FM; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
  • Forman HP; Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
  • Huntington SF; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Blood Adv ; 7(5): 801-810, 2023 03 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36342852
ABSTRACT
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is traditionally considered treatable but incurable. In March 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL after ≥2 lines of therapy. Priced at $373 000, CAR T-cell therapy is potentially curative, and its cost-effectiveness compared with other modern R/R FL treatment strategies is unknown. We developed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of third-line CAR T-cell vs standard of care (SOC) therapies in adults with R/R FL. We estimated progression rates for patients receiving CAR T-cell and SOC therapies from the ZUMA-5 trial and the LEO CReWE study, respectively. We calculated costs, discounted life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAR T-cell vs SOC therapies with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY. Our analysis was conducted from a US payer's perspective over a lifetime horizon. In our base-case model, the cost of the CAR T-cell strategy was $731 682 compared with $458 490 for SOC therapies. However, CAR T-cell therapy was associated with incremental clinical benefit of 1.50 QALYs, resulting in an ICER of $182 127 per QALY. Our model was most sensitive to the utilities associated with CAR T-cell therapy remission and third-line SOC therapies and to the total upfront CAR T-cell therapy cost. Under current pricing, CAR T-cell therapy is unlikely to be cost-effective in unselected patients with FL in the third-line setting. Both randomized clinical trials and longer term clinical follow-up can help clarify the benefits of CAR T-cell therapy and optimal sequencing in patients with FL.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Linfoma Folicular / Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Blood Adv Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Linfoma Folicular / Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Blood Adv Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article