Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PHASE 2 RANDOMIZED STUDY (ORION-1) OF A NOVEL, BIODEGRADABLE DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT (AR-1105) FOR THE TREATMENT OF MACULAR EDEMA DUE TO CENTRAL OR BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION.
Singer, Michael A; Boyer, David S; Williams, Stuart; McKee, Hayley; Kerr, Kevin; Pegoraro, Tyler; Trevino, Leo; Kopczynski, Casey C; Hollander, David A.
Afiliación
  • Singer MA; Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Boyer DS; Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group, Los Angeles, California; and.
  • Williams S; Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Durham, North Carolina.
  • McKee H; Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Kerr K; Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Pegoraro T; Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Trevino L; Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Kopczynski CC; Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Hollander DA; Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Durham, North Carolina.
Retina ; 43(1): 25-33, 2023 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36542081
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

AR-1105 is a novel biodegradable sustained-release dexamethasone implant designed to deliver 6-month durability. This Phase 2 study evaluated two AR-1105 formulations with different release profiles in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS:

Patients received a single intravitreal injection with 340 µg dexamethasone. In the initial phase, five patients received clinical formulation (CF) 1. In the randomized phase, 44 patients were randomized 11 to CF1 or CF2. The follow-up was 6 months. Patients had vision loss due to macular edema diagnosed ≥9 (central retinal vein occlusion) or ≥12 months (branch retinal vein occlusion) before screening, and could be treatment-naive or -experienced (if received prior steroids, must have demonstrated response).

RESULTS:

Both formulations improved vision and reduced retinal thickening from baseline across all visits. At Month 6, mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity were +4.3 and +8.0 letters, and mean changes in central subfield thickness were -93 µm and -211 µm in CF1 and CF2 randomized patients, respectively. Most common adverse events were reduced visual acuity, worsening macular edema, conjunctival hemorrhage, and increased intraocular pressure. No patients required surgery or laser for intraocular pressure control.

CONCLUSION:

Both formulations were well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful and sustained improvements in vision and retinal thickening in patients with retinal vein occlusion with longstanding edema.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana / Edema Macular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Retina Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana / Edema Macular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Retina Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article