Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Longitudinal head-to-head comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir PET in a Phase 2/3 clinical trial of anti-amyloid-ß monoclonal antibodies in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease.
Chen, Charles D; McCullough, Austin; Gordon, Brian; Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly; Flores, Shaney; McKay, Nicole S; Hobbs, Diana A; Hornbeck, Russ; Fagan, Anne M; Cruchaga, Carlos; Goate, Alison M; Perrin, Richard J; Wang, Guoqiao; Li, Yan; Shi, Xinyu; Xiong, Chengjie; Pontecorvo, Michael J; Klein, Gregory; Su, Yi; Klunk, William E; Jack, Clifford; Koeppe, Robert; Snider, B Joy; Berman, Sarah B; Roberson, Erik D; Brosch, Jared; Surti, Ghulam; Jiménez-Velázquez, Ivonne Z; Galasko, Douglas; Honig, Lawrence S; Brooks, William S; Clarnette, Roger; Wallon, David; Dubois, Bruno; Pariente, Jérémie; Pasquier, Florence; Sanchez-Valle, Raquel; Shcherbinin, Sergey; Higgins, Ixavier; Tunali, Ilke; Masters, Colin L; van Dyck, Christopher H; Masellis, Mario; Hsiung, Robin; Gauthier, Serge; Salloway, Steve; Clifford, David B; Mills, Susan; Supnet-Bell, Charlene; McDade, Eric.
Afiliación
  • Chen CD; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • McCullough A; Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8225, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
  • Gordon B; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Joseph-Mathurin N; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Flores S; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • McKay NS; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Hobbs DA; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Hornbeck R; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Fagan AM; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Cruchaga C; Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Goate AM; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Perrin RJ; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Wang G; Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Li Y; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Shi X; Department of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Xiong C; Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Pontecorvo MJ; Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Klein G; Department of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Su Y; Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Klunk WE; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Jack C; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
  • Koeppe R; Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Banner Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Snider BJ; Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Berman SB; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Roberson ED; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Brosch J; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Surti G; Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Jiménez-Velázquez IZ; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Galasko D; Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Honig LS; Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Brooks WS; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • Clarnette R; Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, PR, USA.
  • Wallon D; Department of Neurology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Dubois B; Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Pariente J; Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Pasquier F; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
  • Sanchez-Valle R; Department of Neurology and CNR-MAJ, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM U1245, CHU Rouen, F-76000, Rouen, France.
  • Shcherbinin S; Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, GRC No. 21, APM, Hôpital de La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
  • Higgins I; Institut du Cerveau Et de La Moelle Épinière, INSERM U1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Paris, France.
  • Tunali I; Institut de La Mémoire Et de La Maladie d'Alzheimer, Département de Neurologie, Hôpital de La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
  • Masters CL; Department of Neurology, Hôpital Pierre-Paul Riquet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • van Dyck CH; Toulouse NeuroImaging Centre, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, UPS, Toulouse, France.
  • Masellis M; Univ. Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
  • Hsiung R; CNR-MAJ, Labex DISTALZ, LiCEND, 59000, Lille, France.
  • Gauthier S; Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, Hospital ClínicInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Fundació Clínic Per a La Recerca Biomèdica, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Salloway S; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Clifford DB; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Mills S; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Supnet-Bell C; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • McDade E; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 50(9): 2669-2682, 2023 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37017737
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Pittsburgh Compound-B (11C-PiB) and 18F-florbetapir are amyloid-ß (Aß) positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers that have been used as endpoints in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of anti-Aß monoclonal antibodies. However, comparing drug effects between and within trials may become complicated if different Aß radiotracers were used. To study the consequences of using different Aß radiotracers to measure Aß clearance, we performed a head-to-head comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir in a Phase 2/3 clinical trial of anti-Aß monoclonal antibodies.

METHODS:

Sixty-six mutation-positive participants enrolled in the gantenerumab and placebo arms of the first Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit clinical trial (DIAN-TU-001) underwent both 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir PET imaging at baseline and during at least one follow-up visit. For each PET scan, regional standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs), regional Centiloids, a global cortical SUVR, and a global cortical Centiloid value were calculated. Longitudinal changes in SUVRs and Centiloids were estimated using linear mixed models. Differences in longitudinal change between PET radiotracers and between drug arms were estimated using paired and Welch two sample t-tests, respectively. Simulated clinical trials were conducted to evaluate the consequences of some research sites using 11C-PiB while other sites use 18F-florbetapir for Aß PET imaging.

RESULTS:

In the placebo arm, the absolute rate of longitudinal change measured by global cortical 11C-PiB SUVRs did not differ from that of global cortical 18F-florbetapir SUVRs. In the gantenerumab arm, global cortical 11C-PiB SUVRs decreased more rapidly than global cortical 18F-florbetapir SUVRs. Drug effects were statistically significant across both Aß radiotracers. In contrast, the rates of longitudinal change measured in global cortical Centiloids did not differ between Aß radiotracers in either the placebo or gantenerumab arms, and drug effects remained statistically significant. Regional analyses largely recapitulated these global cortical analyses. Across simulated clinical trials, type I error was higher in trials where both Aß radiotracers were used versus trials where only one Aß radiotracer was used. Power was lower in trials where 18F-florbetapir was primarily used versus trials where 11C-PiB was primarily used.

CONCLUSION:

Gantenerumab treatment induces longitudinal changes in Aß PET, and the absolute rates of these longitudinal changes differ significantly between Aß radiotracers. These differences were not seen in the placebo arm, suggesting that Aß-clearing treatments may pose unique challenges when attempting to compare longitudinal results across different Aß radiotracers. Our results suggest converting Aß PET SUVR measurements to Centiloids (both globally and regionally) can harmonize these differences without losing sensitivity to drug effects. Nonetheless, until consensus is achieved on how to harmonize drug effects across radiotracers, and since using multiple radiotracers in the same trial may increase type I error, multisite studies should consider potential variability due to different radiotracers when interpreting Aß PET biomarker data and, if feasible, use a single radiotracer for the best results. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01760005. Registered 31 December 2012. Retrospectively registered.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Alzheimer Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA NUCLEAR Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Alzheimer Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA NUCLEAR Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos