Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison the treatment of anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament anatomical repair and syndesmosis screw fixation for syndesmotic injuries in ankle fracture.
Lin, Xuping; Tu, Chengquan; Lin, Weihuang; Xie, Weina; Guo, Xiaowei; Liu, Qingjun.
Afiliación
  • Lin X; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University, Zhangzhou, 363000, Fujian Province, China.
  • Tu C; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China.
  • Lin W; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University, Zhangzhou, 363000, Fujian Province, China.
  • Xie W; School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, China.
  • Guo X; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xiamen Haicang Hospital, Xiamen, 361100, China.
  • Liu Q; Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University, Zhangzhou, 363000, China.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 80, 2023 Apr 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37038119
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The fixation method of syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures remains controversial. The goal of the study was to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes between anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) anatomical repair with syndesmosis screw fixation in syndesmotic injuries.

METHODS:

We analyzed 62 patients who were treated with AITFL anatomical repair or syndesmosis screw fixation for syndesmotic injuries in an advanced teaching hospital between March 2016 and March 2019. Fixation was performed with AITFL anatomical repair in 30 patients (AAR group) and syndesmosis screw in 32 patients (SS group). Radiographic evaluations were the differences in mean anterior and posterior (A difference and P difference) tibiofibular distance between injured and uninjured ankle computed tomography (CT) scan at 6 months postoperatively. Clinical evaluation of patients was done using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle Hindfoot Score, the Olerud-Molander Ankle (OMA) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 1, 3, 6 months and 1, 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS:

The A difference and P difference on CT was no differences (1.6 ± 0.8 mm, 1.3 ± 0.7 mm vs. 1.5 ± 0.7 mm, 1.2 ± 0.7 mm) between the two groups (All of P > 0.05). The AAR group had higher mean AOFAS score (65.6 ± 5.9, 82.3 ± 4.2, 87.6 ± 5.6 vs. 61.8 ± 5.2, 79.1 ± 4.0, 83.8 ± 4.9; P = 0.008, 0.003, 0.007) and higher mean OMA score (45.7 ± 8.7, 79.2 ± 6.5, 84.1 ± 5.3 vs. 40.4 ± 7.3, 74.8 ± 6.3, 80.3 ± 5.8; P = 0.012, 0.009, 0.010)) at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The AAR group had lower mean VAS scores (2.6 ± 1.2, 1.7 ± 0.7 vs. 3.4 ± 1.2, 2.2 ± 1.1; P = 0.018, 0.038) at 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study suggest that the AITFL anatomical repair technique could effectively improve ankle function during daily activity. Therefore, AITFL anatomical repair technique is expected to become a better fixation method for syndesmotic injuries.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos del Tobillo / Ligamentos Laterales del Tobillo / Fracturas de Tobillo Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos del Tobillo / Ligamentos Laterales del Tobillo / Fracturas de Tobillo Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China