Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence and Prognosis of Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hasegawa, Daisuke; Ishisaka, Yoshiko; Maeda, Tetsuro; Prasitlumkum, Narut; Nishida, Kazuki; Dugar, Siddharth; Sato, Ryota.
Afiliación
  • Hasegawa D; Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY, USA.
  • Ishisaka Y; Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY, USA.
  • Maeda T; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
  • Prasitlumkum N; Department of Cardiology, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, USA.
  • Nishida K; Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Dugar S; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Sato R; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Intensive Care Med ; 38(9): 797-808, 2023 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37272081
Purpose: The prevalence and its impact on mortality of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SICM) remain controversial. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the prevalence and prognosis of SICM. Materials and Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase. Titles and abstracts were evaluated based on the following criteria: (1) published in English, (2) randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or cross-sectional studies, (3) ≥ 18 years with sepsis, (4) reporting the prevalence and/or comparison of short-term mortality between those with and without SICM, defined as the new-onset reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) within 72 h on admission or from the diagnosis of sepsis. The random-effect model was used for all analyses. This meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CDR42022332896). Results: Sixteen studies reported the prevalence of SICM and the pooled prevalence of SICM was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16-25%; I2 = 89.9%, P < 0.01). Eleven studies reported short-term mortality and SICM was associated with significantly higher short-term mortality (The pooled odds ratio: 2.30, 95% CI, 1.43-3.69; I2 = 0%, P = 0.001). Conclusion: The prevalence of SICM was 20% in patients with sepsis, and the occurrence of SICM was associated with significantly higher short-term mortality.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Choque Séptico / Sepsis / Cardiomiopatías Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Intensive Care Med Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Choque Séptico / Sepsis / Cardiomiopatías Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Intensive Care Med Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos