Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-invasive skin autofluorescence as a screening method for diabetic retinopathy.
Martínez-García, Irene; Cavero-Redondo, Iván; Álvarez-Bueno, Celia; Pascual-Morena, Carlos; Gómez-Guijarro, María Dolores; Saz-Lara, Alicia.
Afiliación
  • Martínez-García I; Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
  • Cavero-Redondo I; Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
  • Álvarez-Bueno C; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, Chile.
  • Pascual-Morena C; Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
  • Gómez-Guijarro MD; Universidad Politécnica y Artística del Paraguay, Asunción, Paraguay.
  • Saz-Lara A; Health and Social Research Center, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 40(2): e3721, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37672325
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a public health problem and a common cause of blindness. It is diagnosed by fundus examination; however, this is a costly and time-consuming method. Non-invasive skin autofluorescence (SAF) may be an accessible, fast and simple alternative for screening and early diagnosis of DR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of SAF as a screening method for DR. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed. Random effects models for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (dOR) value and 95% CIs were used to calculate test accuracy. In addition, hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves (HSROC) were used to summarise the overall test performance. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.88; I2  = 0.0%) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.32-0.92; I2  = 97.0%), respectively. The dOR value for the diagnosis of DR using SAF was 5.11 (95% CI 1.81-14.48: I2  = 85.9%). The PRL was 2.17 (95% CI 0.62-7.64) and the NRL was 0.27 (95% CI 0.07-1.03). Heterogeneity was not relevant in sensitivity and considerable in specificity. The 95% confidence region of the HSROC included all studies. SAF as a screening test for DR shows sufficient accuracy for its use in clinical settings. SAF may be an appropriate method for DR screening, and further research is needed to recommend it as a diagnostic method.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus / Retinopatía Diabética Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / METABOLISMO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus / Retinopatía Diabética Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / METABOLISMO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España