Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Testing novel facial recognition technology to identify dogs during vaccination campaigns.
Czupryna, Anna Maria; Estepho, Mike; Lugelo, Ahmed; Bigambo, Machunde; Sambo, Maganga; Changalucha, Joel; Lushasi, Kennedy Selestin; Rooyakkers, Philip; Hampson, Katie; Lankester, Felix.
Afiliación
  • Czupryna AM; Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
  • Estepho M; Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Lugelo A; PiP My Pet Technologies, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
  • Bigambo M; Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Sambo M; Global Animal Health Tanzania, P.O. Box 1642, Arusha, Tanzania.
  • Changalucha J; Department of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O. Box 3105, Morogoro, Tanzania.
  • Lushasi KS; Global Animal Health Tanzania, P.O. Box 1642, Arusha, Tanzania.
  • Rooyakkers P; Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
  • Hampson K; Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
  • Lankester F; Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 22025, 2023 12 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38086911
ABSTRACT
A lack of methods to identify individual animals can be a barrier to zoonoses control. We developed and field-tested facial recognition technology for a mobile phone application to identify dogs, which we used to assess vaccination coverage against rabies in rural Tanzania. Dogs were vaccinated, registered using the application, and microchipped. During subsequent household visits to validate vaccination, dogs were registered using the application and their vaccination status determined by operators using the application to classify dogs as vaccinated (matched) or unvaccinated (unmatched), with microchips validating classifications. From 534 classified dogs (251 vaccinated, 283 unvaccinated), the application specificity was 98.9% and sensitivity 76.2%, with positive and negative predictive values of 98.4% and 82.8% respectively. The facial recognition algorithm correctly matched 249 (99.2%) vaccinated and microchipped dogs (true positives) and failed to match two (0.8%) vaccinated dogs (false negatives). Operators correctly identified 186 (74.1%) vaccinated dogs (true positives), and 280 (98.9%) unvaccinated dogs (true negatives), but incorrectly classified 58 (23.1%) vaccinated dogs as unmatched (false negatives). Reduced application sensitivity resulted from poor quality photos and light-associated color distortion. With development and operator training, this technology has potential to be a useful tool to identify dogs and support research and intervention programs.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rabia / Vacunas Antirrábicas / Enfermedades de los Perros Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rabia / Vacunas Antirrábicas / Enfermedades de los Perros Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido