Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
BRAF/MEK inhibitor rechallenge in advanced melanoma patients.
Van Not, Olivier J; van den Eertwegh, Alfons J M; Haanen, John B; van Rijn, Rozemarijn S; Aarts, Maureen J B; van den Berkmortel, Franchette W P J; Blank, Christian U; Boers-Sonderen, Marye J; de Groot, Jan Willem W B; Hospers, Geke A P; Kapiteijn, Ellen; Bloem, Manja; Piersma, Djura; Stevense-den Boer, Marion; Verheijden, Rik J; van der Veldt, Astrid A M; Wouters, Michel W J M; Blokx, Willeke A M; Suijkerbuijk, Karijn P M.
Afiliación
  • Van Not OJ; Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van den Eertwegh AJM; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Haanen JB; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Rijn RS; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Aarts MJB; Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
  • van den Berkmortel FWPJ; Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Blank CU; Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Sittard, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
  • Boers-Sonderen MJ; Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Groot JWWB; Department of Medical Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hospers GAP; Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Kapiteijn E; Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Bloem M; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Piersma D; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Stevense-den Boer M; Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Verheijden RJ; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van der Veldt AAM; Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Wouters MWJM; Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
  • Blokx WAM; Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
  • Suijkerbuijk KPM; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cancer ; 130(9): 1673-1683, 2024 May 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38198485
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Effectivity of BRAF(/MEK) inhibitor rechallenge has been described in prior studies. However, structured data are largely lacking.

METHODS:

Data from all advanced melanoma patients treated with BRAFi(/MEKi) rechallenge were retrieved from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. The authors analyzed objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for both first treatment and rechallenge. They performed a multivariable logistic regression and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to assess factors associated with response and survival.

RESULTS:

The authors included 468 patients in the largest cohort to date who underwent at least two treatment episodes of BRAFi(/MEKi). Following rechallenge, ORR was 43%, median PFS was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-5.2), and median OS was 8.2 months (95% CI, 7.2-9.4). Median PFS after rechallenge for patients who discontinued first BRAFi(/MEKi) treatment due to progression was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.7-4.0) versus 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.5-5.9) for patients who discontinued treatment for other reasons. Discontinuing first treatment due to progression and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels greater than two times the upper limit of normal were associated with lower odds of response and worse PFS and OS. Symptomatic brain metastases were associated with worse survival, whereas a longer treatment interval between first treatment and rechallenge was associated with better survival. Responding to the first BRAFi(/MEKi) treatment was not associated with response or survival.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study confirms that patients benefit from rechallenge. Elevated LDH levels, symptomatic brain metastases, and discontinuing first BRAFi(/MEKi) treatment due to progression are associated with less benefit from rechallenge. A prolonged treatment interval is associated with more benefit from rechallenge.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos