Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-World Effectiveness Study of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir or Molnupiravir in Hospitalized Unvaccinated Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Moderate COVID-19 at Presentation.
Kwok, Wang Chun; Tam, Terence Chi Chun; Ho, James Chung Man; Lam, David Chi Leung; Ip, Mary Sau-Man; Ho, Pak Leung.
Afiliación
  • Kwok WC; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
  • Tam TCC; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
  • Ho JCM; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
  • Lam DCL; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
  • Ip MS; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
  • Ho PL; Department of Microbiology and Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38222320
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) and molnupiravir (MOL) were developed as out-patient anti-viral for mild COVID-19. There was limited data on their role in treating COVID-19 for hospitalized patients, especially among adult patients who are unvaccinated and had chronic respiratory diseases.

Methods:

A territory-wide retrospective study was conducted in Hong Kong to compare the efficacy of NMV-r and MOL against COVID-19 in unvaccinated adult patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis and interstitial lung diseases presenting with moderate COVID-19 from 16th February 2022 to 15th March 2023.

Results:

A total of 1354 patients were included, 738 received NMV-r and 616 received MOL. NMV-r was more effective in reducing 90-day mortality with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of 0.508 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.314-0.822, p = 0.006). Patients who received NMV-r also had significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) than those receiving MOL, with median LOS of 4 (Interquartile range [IQR] = 2-7) for NMV-r and 6 (IQR = 3-10) for MOL (p-value < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the development of respiratory failure and severe respiratory failure in the two groups.

Discussion:

NMV-r was more effective than MOL among unvaccinated adults with chronic respiratory diseases who were hospitalized for moderate COVID-19 without hypoxaemia on admission.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Respiratorios / Insuficiencia Respiratoria / Prolina / Citidina / Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / COVID-19 / Hidroxilaminas / Lactamas / Leucina / Nitrilos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Respiratorios / Insuficiencia Respiratoria / Prolina / Citidina / Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / COVID-19 / Hidroxilaminas / Lactamas / Leucina / Nitrilos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article