Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An experimental game to assess hunter's participation in zoonotic diseases surveillance.
Pouliquen, Aude; Mapeyi, Gilles Aurélien Boupana; Vanthomme, Hadrien; Olive, Marie-Marie; Maganga, Gaël Darren; Cornelis, Daniel; Lebel, Sébastien; Peyre, Marisa; Delabouglise, Alexis.
Afiliación
  • Pouliquen A; CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France. aude.pouliq1@gmail.com.
  • Mapeyi GAB; CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier, France. aude.pouliq1@gmail.com.
  • Vanthomme H; CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France.
  • Olive MM; CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier, France.
  • Maganga GD; CIRAD, UPR Forêts Et Sociétés, Montpellier, France.
  • Cornelis D; CIRAD, Forêts et Sociétés, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Lebel S; CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France.
  • Peyre M; CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier, France.
  • Delabouglise A; Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherches Médicales de Franceville (CIRMF), Franceville, Gabon.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 342, 2024 02 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38302879
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Strengthening the surveillance of zoonotic diseases emergence in the wild meat value chains is a critical component of the prevention of future health crises. Community hunters could act as first-line observers in zoonotic pathogens surveillance systems in wildlife, by reporting early signs of the possible presence of a disease in the game animals they observe and manipulate on a regular basis.

METHODS:

An experimental game was developed and implemented in a forested area of Gabon, in central Africa. Our objective was to improve our understanding of community hunters' decision-making when finding signs of zoonotic diseases in game animals would they report or dissimulate these findings to a health agency? 88 hunters, divided into 9 groups of 5 to 13 participants, participated in the game, which was run over 21 rounds. In each round the players participated in a simulated hunting trip during which they had a chance of capturing a wild animal displaying clinical signs of a zoonotic disease. When signs were visible, players had to decide whether to sell/consume the animal or to report it. The last option implied a lowered revenue from the hunt but an increased probability of early detection of zoonotic diseases with benefits for the entire group of hunters.

RESULTS:

The results showed that false alerts-i.e. a suspect case not caused by a zoonotic disease-led to a decrease in the number of reports in the next round (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.36-0.8, p < 0.01). Hunters who had an agricultural activity in addition to hunting reported suspect cases more often than others (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.09-3.88, p < 0.03). The number of suspect case reports increased with the rank of the game round (Incremental OR 1.11, CI 1.06-1.17, p < 0.01) suggesting an increase in participants' inclination to report throughout the game.

CONCLUSION:

Using experimental games presents an added value for improving the understanding of people's decisions to participate in health surveillance systems.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Zoonosis / Animales Salvajes Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Zoonosis / Animales Salvajes Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Public Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia