Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of Methenamine for Urinary Tract Infection Prophylaxis: Systematic Review of Recent Evidence.
Davidson, Spencer M; Brown, Jamie N; Nance, Clayton B; Townsend, Mary L.
Afiliación
  • Davidson SM; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Brown JN; Pharmacy Service, Durham VA Health Care System, 508 Fulton St. (119), Durham, NC, 27705, USA. Jamie.Brown2@va.gov.
  • Nance CB; Department of Pharmacy Practice, Campbell University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Buies Creek, NC, USA. Jamie.Brown2@va.gov.
  • Townsend ML; Pharmacy Service, Durham VA Health Care System, 508 Fulton St. (119), Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(3): 483-489, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38329493
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

HYPOTHESIS:

Antibiotic resistance is an unavoidable consequence of antibiotic use and growing rates of resistance are an urgent issue. Methenamine is a non-antibiotic alternative used for urinary tract infection (UTI) prophylaxis. The objective of this review is to evaluate recently published literature regarding the efficacy and safety of methenamine for UTI prophylaxis.

METHODS:

PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were queried in March 2023 using the following search terms urinary tract infection, cystitis, bacteriuria, or dysuria, and methenamine. Studies prior to 2012 were excluded from this review to focus on appraisal of the most recent evidence. Prospective and controlled retrospective trials were included for review.

RESULTS:

A total of seven studies (three prospective and four retrospective) met the inclusion criteria for review. Two of the 3 prospective studies demonstrated no or non-inferior differences in clinical efficacy to prevent recurrent UTIs between methenamine and antibiotic prophylaxis and the third showed decreased rates of UTI with methenamine use in patients with short-term indwelling catheters compared with cranberry alone. The retrospective studies consistently supported the efficacy and safety of methenamine for UTI prophylaxis in a variety of populations and clinical settings. Adverse effects reported with methenamine were similar to comparators and included nausea, abdominal pain, and headache.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of methenamine for UTI prophylaxis was shown to be effective in a variety of settings without an increased risk of adverse effects compared with prophylactic antibiotics. Larger blinded clinical trials are needed to further define the role of methenamine in UTI prophylaxis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Urinarias / Metenamina Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Urinarias / Metenamina Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos