Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Minor Amputation Conversion to Major Amputation.
Rolle, Nicholas P; Kawaji, Qingwen; Morton, Claire; Rosenberg, Kenneth M; Kalsi, Richa; Blitzer, David N; Nagarsheth, Khanjan.
Afiliación
  • Rolle NP; Department of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA. Electronic address: Nrolle21md@gmail.com.
  • Kawaji Q; Department of Surgery, Medstar Health Baltimore, Baltimore, MD.
  • Morton C; Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Rosenberg KM; Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
  • Kalsi R; Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
  • Blitzer DN; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
  • Nagarsheth K; Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 104: 166-173, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387800
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Minor lower extremity amputations (LEAs) have become an important part of the limb salvage approach but are not as benign as previously thought. This study investigates the difference in outcome between toe/ray versus midfoot amputations and the risk factors for major amputation conversion associated with each procedure.

METHODS:

We performed retrospective chart review of foot amputation patients at a single tertiary care medical center with a primary end point of conversion to major amputation and secondary end points of 1-year wound healing and mortality rate. We collected data on relevant medical comorbidities, noninvasive vascular imaging, revascularization, repeat amputations, wound healing rate, and 1-year mortality. Patients were separated into toe/ray amputations versus midfoot amputation groups and compared using descriptive statistics, Chi-squared tests, Cox proportional hazards, and a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS:

A total of 375 amputations were included in the analysis. 65.3% (245 patients) included toe/ray amputations and 34.7% (130 patients) included midfoot amputations. We compared these 2 cohorts with regard to their rate of conversion to repeat minor and/or major amputation in addition to overall mortality. The toe/ray group underwent more repeat minor amputations within 1 year after index amputation (34.7% vs. 21.5%, P = 0.008) and wound healing (epithelization) at 90 days was also higher in this group. The midfoot group had a higher conversion to major LEA within 1 year on univariate analysis (20.8 vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001). Overall 1-year mortality was 6.17% and there was no significant difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

While there is a consistency with previous studies that found no significant overall difference in mortality between types of minor LEA, we have extended this previous work by demonstrating the independent risk factors for conversion to major amputation between types of minor LEA. Comparing these 2 groups will assist surgeons in choosing the appropriate level of amputations and will enhance patient's understanding of their chance of wound healing and risk of repeat amputation.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cicatrización de Heridas / Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales / Amputación Quirúrgica Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cicatrización de Heridas / Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales / Amputación Quirúrgica Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article