Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Breast Imaging Fellowship Match: Applicants' Perspectives of Years Two and Three.
Lee, Michelle V; Katzen, Janine T; Al-Khalili, Rend; Choudhery, Sadia; Whitman, Gary; Brem, Rachel.
Afiliación
  • Lee MV; Augusta University at the Medical College of Georgia, Department of Radiology, Augusta, GA.
  • Katzen JT; Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Radiology, New York, NY.
  • Al-Khalili R; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Washington, DC.
  • Choudhery S; Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, MN.
  • Whitman G; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, Houston, TX.
  • Brem R; The George Washington University, Department of Radiology, Washington, DC.
J Breast Imaging ; 2(5): 471-477, 2020 Sep 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38424908
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study is to summarize the results of a survey distributed by the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) to assess applicants' experience with the 2018 and 2019 Breast Imaging Fellowship Match process.

METHODS:

In this institutional review board-exempt study, the SBI issued an anonymous survey to all matched applicants in an attempt to gauge their experience with the 2018 and 2019 Match process.

RESULTS:

The survey was sent to all 2018 and 2019 matched applicants and 105/236 (45%) responses were received. The majority (75%, 79/105) of respondents reported a positive experience with the Match, with at least a 4/5 rating, and only 3% (5/105) reported a rating below 3/5. There was some improvement in 2019, with 86% (24/28) of respondents reporting at least a 4/5 rating compared to 71% (55/77) in 2018. No respondent reported a score below a 3/5 rating in 2019. The most commonly cited issues with the Match were the timing of the Match process, the need for a universal application, and the burden of travel. Location and program reputation were the two most important factors contributing to the final rank order of programs.

CONCLUSION:

The great majority of applicants felt that the Match created a positive experience. Planned areas of improvement include the implementation of a universal application, the transition to virtual interviews, and a condensed timeline. These measures are likely to increase applicant satisfaction and provide a fair and efficient experience for future breast radiologists.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Breast Imaging / Journal of breast imaging (Online) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Breast Imaging / Journal of breast imaging (Online) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article