Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Heterogeneity of State Stroke Center Certification and Designation Processes.
Feldmeier, Madeline; Kim, Anthony S; Zachrison, Kori S; Alberts, Mark J; Shen, Yu-Chu; Hsia, Renee Y.
Afiliación
  • Feldmeier M; Department of Emergency Medicine (M.F., R.Y.H.), University of California, San Francisco.
  • Kim AS; Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute of Neurosciences (A.S.K.), University of California, San Francisco.
  • Zachrison KS; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (K.S.Z.).
  • Alberts MJ; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (K.S.Z.).
  • Shen YC; Ayer Neuroscience Institute, Hartford HealthCare, CT (M.J.A.).
  • Hsia RY; Department of Defense Management, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA (Y.-C.S.).
Stroke ; 55(4): 1051-1058, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469729
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Stroke centers are critical for the timely diagnosis and treatment of acute stroke and have been associated with improved treatment and outcomes; however, variability exists in the definitions and processes used to certify and designate these centers. Our study categorizes state stroke center certification and designation processes and provides examples of state processes across the United States, specifically in states with independent designation processes that do not rely on national certification.

METHODS:

In this cross-sectional study from September 2022 to April 2023, we used peer-reviewed literature, primary source documents from states, and communication with state officials in all 50 states to capture each state's process for stroke center certification and designation. We categorized this information and outlined examples of processes in each category.

RESULTS:

Our cross-sectional study of state-level stroke center certification and designation processes across states reveals significant heterogeneity in the terminology used to describe state processes and the processes themselves. We identify 3 main categories of state processes No State Certification or Designation Process (category A; n=12), State Designation Reliant on National Certification Only (category B; n=24), and State Has Option for Self-Certification or Independent Designation (category C; n=14). Furthermore, we describe 3 subcategories of self-certification or independent state designation processes State Relies on Self-Certification or Independent Designation for Acute Stroke Ready Hospital or Equivalent (category C1; n=3), State Has Hybrid Model for Acute Stroke Ready Hospital or Equivalent (category C2; n=5), and State Has Hybrid Model for Primary Stroke Center and Above (category C3; n=6).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study found significant heterogeneity in state-level processes. A better understanding of how these differences may impact the rigor of each process and clinical performance of stroke centers is worthy of further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Accidente Cerebrovascular Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Stroke Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Accidente Cerebrovascular Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Stroke Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article