Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the influence of graft loss on 4-year patient survival after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: Kaplan-Meier versus Competing Risk Analysis model.
Alfaro Villanueva, Lucia Alejandra; Junior, Roberto Meirelles; Rangel, Érika Bevilaqua; Modelli, Luis Gustavo; Viana, Laila Almeida; Cristelli, Marina Pontello; Requião-Moura, Lúcio; Foresto, Renato Demarchi; Tedesco-Silva, Helio; Pestana, José Medina.
Afiliación
  • Alfaro Villanueva LA; Hospital do Rim, Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Junior RM; Nephrology Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Rangel ÉB; Hospital do Rim, Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Modelli LG; Hospital do Rim, Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Viana LA; Nephrology Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Cristelli MP; Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
  • Requião-Moura L; Hospital do Rim, Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Foresto RD; Hospital do Rim, Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Tedesco-Silva H; Hospital do Rim, Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Pestana JM; Nephrology Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clin Transplant ; 38(4): e15298, 2024 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545918
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Graft loss increases the risk of patient death after simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. The relative risk of each graft failure is complex due to the influence of several competing events.

METHODS:

This retrospective, single-center study compared 4-year patient survival according to the graft status using Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Competing Risk Analysis (CRA). Patient survival was also assessed according to five eras (Era 1 2001-2003; Era 2 2004-2006; Era 3 2007-2009; Era 4 2010-2012; Era 5 2012-2015).

RESULTS:

Between 2000 and 2015, 432 SPK transplants were performed. Using KM, patient survival was 86.5% for patients without graft loss (n = 333), 93.4% for patients with pancreas graft loss (n = 46), 43.7% for patients with kidney graft loss (n = 16), and 25.4% for patients with pancreas and kidney graft loss (n = 37). Patient survival was underestimated using KM versus CRA methods in patients with pancreas and kidney graft losses (25.4% vs. 36.2%), respectively. Induction with lymphocyte depleting antibodies was associated with 81% reduced risk (HR.19, 95% CI.38-.98, p = .0048), while delayed kidney function (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.09-7.95, p = .033) and surgical complications (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.22-7.08, p = .016) were associated with higher risk of death. Four-year patient survival increased from Era 1 to Era 5 (79% vs. 87.9%, p = .047).

CONCLUSION:

In this cohort of patients, kidney graft loss, with or without pancreas graft loss, was associated with higher mortality after SPK transplantation. Compared to CRA, the KM model underestimated survival only among patients with pancreas and kidney graft losses. Patient survival increased over time.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Riñón / Trasplante de Páncreas / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Riñón / Trasplante de Páncreas / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil