Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Advancing maxillofacial prosthodontics by using pre-trained convolutional neural networks: Image-based classification of the maxilla.
Ali, Islam E; Sumita, Yuka; Wakabayashi, Noriyuki.
Afiliación
  • Ali IE; Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sumita Y; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Wakabayashi N; Division of General Dentistry 4, The Nippon Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Prosthodont ; 33(7): 645-654, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566564
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The study aimed to compare the performance of four pre-trained convolutional neural networks in recognizing seven distinct prosthodontic scenarios involving the maxilla, as a preliminary step in developing an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered prosthesis design system. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Seven distinct classes, including cleft palate, dentulous maxillectomy, edentulous maxillectomy, reconstructed maxillectomy, completely dentulous, partially edentulous, and completely edentulous, were considered for recognition. Utilizing transfer learning and fine-tuned hyperparameters, four AI models (VGG16, Inception-ResNet-V2, DenseNet-201, and Xception) were employed. The dataset, consisting of 3541 preprocessed intraoral occlusal images, was divided into training, validation, and test sets. Model performance metrics encompassed accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and confusion matrix.

RESULTS:

VGG16, Inception-ResNet-V2, DenseNet-201, and Xception demonstrated comparable performance, with maximum test accuracies of 0.92, 0.90, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively. Xception and DenseNet-201 slightly outperformed the other models, particularly compared with InceptionResNet-V2. Precision, recall, and F1 scores exceeded 90% for most classes in Xception and DenseNet-201 and the average AUC values for all models ranged between 0.98 and 1.00.

CONCLUSIONS:

While DenseNet-201 and Xception demonstrated superior performance, all models consistently achieved diagnostic accuracy exceeding 90%, highlighting their potential in dental image analysis. This AI application could help work assignments based on difficulty levels and enable the development of an automated diagnosis system at patient admission. It also facilitates prosthesis designing by integrating necessary prosthesis morphology, oral function, and treatment difficulty. Furthermore, it tackles dataset size challenges in model optimization, providing valuable insights for future research.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prostodoncia / Redes Neurales de la Computación / Maxilar Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthodont Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prostodoncia / Redes Neurales de la Computación / Maxilar Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthodont Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón