Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Benchmarking System Monitoring on Quality Improvement in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Registry in Japan.
Saito, Yuichi; Inohara, Taku; Kohsaka, Shun; Wada, Hideki; Kumamaru, Hiraku; Yamaji, Kyohei; Ishii, Hideki; Amano, Tetsuya; Miyata, Hiroaki; Kobayashi, Yoshio; Kozuma, Ken.
Afiliación
  • Saito Y; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
  • Inohara T; Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kohsaka S; Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Wada H; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Izunokuni, Japan.
  • Kumamaru H; Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yamaji K; Department of Cardiology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Ishii H; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
  • Amano T; Department of Cardiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
  • Miyata H; Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kobayashi Y; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
  • Kozuma K; Department of Cardiology, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
JACC Asia ; 4(4): 323-331, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38660107
ABSTRACT

Background:

Quality indicators (QIs) have been developed to improve and standardize care quality in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In Japan, consecutive PCI procedures are registered in a nationwide database (the Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention registry), which introduces a benchmarking system for comparing individual institutional performance against the national average.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the benchmarking system implementation on QI improvement at the hospital level.

Methods:

A total of 734,264 PCIs were conducted at 1,194 institutions between January 2019 and December 2021. In January 2018, a web-based benchmarking system encompassing 7 QIs for PCI at the institutional level, including door-to-balloon time and rate of transradial intervention, was introduced. The process by which institutions tracked their QIs was centrally monitored.

Results:

During the 3-year study period, the benchmarking system was reviewed at least once at 742 institutions (62.1%) (median 4 times; Q1-Q3 2-7 times). The institutions that reviewed their records had higher PCI volumes. Among these institutions, although door-to-balloon time was not directly associated, the proportion of transradial intervention increased by 2.3% in the system review group during the initial year compared with 0.7% in their counterparts. However, in the subsequent year, the association between system reviews and QI improvement was attenuated.

Conclusions:

The implementation of a benchmarking system, reviewed by participating institutions in Japan, was partially associated with improved QIs during the first year; however, this improvement was attenuated in the subsequent year, highlighting the need for further efforts to develop effective and sustainable interventions to enhance care quality in PCI.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JACC Asia Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JACC Asia Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón