Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multidimensional versus unidimensional pain scales for the assessment of analgesic requirement in the emergency department: a systematic review.
Crisman, Elena; Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian; Tabakovic, Senad; Nickel, Christian Hans; Minotti, Bruno.
Afiliación
  • Crisman E; Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
  • Appenzeller-Herzog C; University Medical Library, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Tabakovic S; Emergency Department, Spital Wil, Wil, Switzerland.
  • Nickel CH; Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Minotti B; Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. bruno.minotti@usb.ch.
Intern Emerg Med ; 19(5): 1463-1471, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664325
ABSTRACT
Pain is a multidimensional experience, potentially rendering unidimensional pain scales inappropriate for assessment. Prior research highlighted their inadequacy as reliable indicators of analgesic requirement. This systematic review aimed to compare multidimensional with unidimensional pain scales in assessing analgesic requirements in the emergency department (ED). Embase, Medline, CINAHL, and PubMed Central were searched to identify ED studies utilizing both unidimensional and multidimensional pain scales. Primary outcome was desire for analgesia. Secondary outcomes were amount of administered analgesia and patient satisfaction. Two independent reviewers screened, assessed quality, and extracted data of eligible studies. We assessed risk of bias with the ROBINS-I tool and provide a descriptive summary. Out of 845 publications, none met primary outcome criteria. Three studies analyzed secondary outcomes. One study compared the multidimensional Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) to the unidimensional Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for opioid administration. DVPRS identified more patients with moderate instead of severe pain compared to the NRS. Therefore, the DVPRS might lead to a potential reduction in opioid administration for individuals who do not require it. Two studies assessing patient satisfaction favored the short forms (SF) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) over the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the NRS. Limited heterogenous literature suggests that in the ED, a multidimensional pain scale (DVPRS), may better discriminate moderate and severe pain compared to a unidimensional pain scale (NRS). This potentially impacts analgesia, particularly when analgesic interventions rely on pain scores. Patients might prefer multidimensional pain scales (BPI-SF, MPQ-SF) over NRS or VAS for assessing their pain experience.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dimensión del Dolor / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Analgésicos Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Intern Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA / MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dimensión del Dolor / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Analgésicos Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Intern Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA / MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza