Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway is a marker of lung cell activation but does not play a central pathologic role in engineered stone-associated silicosis.
Song, Yong; Yen, Seiha; Southam, Katherine; Gaskin, Sharyn; Hoy, Ryan F; Zosky, Graeme R.
Afiliación
  • Song Y; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Yen S; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Southam K; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Gaskin S; Adelaide Exposure Science and Health, School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Hoy RF; Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Zosky GR; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Appl Toxicol ; 2024 Jun 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837244
ABSTRACT
Engineered stone-associated silicosis is characterised by a rapid progression of fibrosis linked to a shorter duration of exposure. To date, there is lack of information about molecular pathways that regulates disease development and the aggressiveness of this form of silicosis. Therefore, we compared transcriptome responses to different engineered stone samples and standard silica. We then identified and further tested a stone dust specific pathway (aryl hydrocarbon receptor [AhR]) in relation to mitigation of adverse lung cell responses. Cells (epithelial cells, A549; macrophages, THP-1) were exposed to two different benchtop stone samples, standard silica and vehicle control, followed by RNA sequencing analysis. Bioinformatics analyses were conducted, and the expression of dysregulated AhR pathway genes resulting from engineered stone exposure was then correlated with cytokine responses. Finally, we inhibited AhR pathway in cells pretreated with AhR antagonist and observed how this impacted cell cytotoxicity and inflammation. Through transcriptome analysis, we identified the AhR pathway genes (CYP1A1, CYP1B1 and TIPARP) that showed differential expression that was unique to engineered stones and common between both cell types. The expression of these genes was positively correlated with interleukin-8 production in A549 and THP-1 cells. However, we only observed a mild effect of AhR pathway inhibition on engineered stone dust induced cytokine responses. Given the dual roles of AhR pathway in physiological and pathological processes, our data showed that expression of AhR target genes could be markers for assessing toxicity of engineered stones; however, AhR pathway might not play a significant pathologic role in engineered stone-associated silicosis.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Toxicol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Toxicol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia