Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of robotic liver surgery for the elderly: A propensity-score matched analysis of short-term outcomes with open liver surgery at a single center in Denmark.
Fukumori, Daisuke; Tschuor, Christoph; Hamada, Takashi; Penninga, Luit; Hillingsø, Jens; Svendsen, Lars Bo; Nørgaard Larsen, Peter.
Afiliación
  • Fukumori D; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Tschuor C; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hamada T; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Penninga L; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hillingsø J; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Svendsen LB; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Nørgaard Larsen P; CAMES, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866728
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The incidence of liver tumors requiring surgical treatment continues to increase in elderly patients. This study compared the short-term results of robotic liver surgery (RLS) versus open liver surgery (OLS) for liver tumors in elderly patients.

METHODS:

A prospective database including all patients undergoing liver surgery at Copenhagen University Hospital between July 2019 and July 2022 was managed retrospectively. Short-term surgical outcomes of the two main cohorts (OLS and RLS) and subgroups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) in elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with liver tumors.

RESULTS:

A total of 42 matched patients from each group were investigated the RLS group had significantly larger tumor diameters, less blood loss (821.2 vs. 155.2 mL, p < .001), and shorter hospital stays (6.6 vs. 3.4 days, p < .001). Overall morbidity was comparable, while operative times were longer in the RLS group. The advantages observed with the robotic approach were replicated in the subgroup of minor liver resections.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients ≥70 years, RLS for liver tumors results in significantly less blood loss and shorter hospital stays than OLS. RLS, especially minor liver resection, is safe and feasible in elderly patients with liver tumors.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca